07_SeppDietrich
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Jun 11, 2018
- Messages
- 146
- Reaction score
- -1
- Country
- Location
3rd Iran should leave the UN to avoid US sanctions even though you won't be received UN aid
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The way it is going I think US will leave UN first3rd Iran should leave the UN to avoid US sanctions even though you won't be received UN aid
It's obvious if your refinery designed for iran oil . you'll need to use an oil with the exact same specific.Saudi oil is Arabian light. irani oil is sour and heavy, it’s an obvious choice who we’ll choose.
you are naive child ...This is not Ahmadinejad era @raptor22, if they try to replace us, IRGC will cripple their oil production.
An old persian saying
دیگی که واسه ما نمیجوشه، سر سگ توش بجوشه
Persian gulf 2ill be their grave
They can , they do ....
you are naive child ...
That is the dictionary definition of bullying. "either restart trade with us or we'll nuke you till oblivion". Thank god Iran is nowhere near being able to bully anyone including the tiny uae.1. Develop nukes and start a non nuclear war against saudi and UAE, while threatening anyone interfering with nukes. And threatening US with nukes if they dont remove sanctions.
haha well said. Long live islam and ummah.Well I doubt we do any thing to them .
KSA agreed to produce 2 million additional barrel of oil on daily bases .
And guess what we did . gave 3900 toman Dollar to pilgrims who went to KSA while industry get 4200 toman Dollar and funny part is the first condition of haj is being financially able.
And what exactly would you call threatening to sanction anyone who dares to trade with iran then,as chump has done?.Actually its not bullying its blackmail,and nuclear blackmail has the potential to be very,very effective,well it certainly appears to have worked rather well for the dprk so far,altho some of that you could no doubt chalk up to chumps monstrous vanity and ego and the no doubt rightly justified fears of the rok that they might wind up as the dead meat[barbecued?] in a dprk/us nuke sandwich.Ultimately the europeans would have to decide whos interests they were now going to put first,theirs or us+israel.Its one thing to cut ones throat economically for usrael but would you be prepared to risk seeing western europe laid waste for the third time in a century or even just the threat of a return to MAD as it was during the dark days of the early 80s cold war?,I suspect many europeans would not,however when one has lived as a vassal state for decades it is not such an easy task to suddenly start to act and think as an independent state and to put ones own interests first.That is the dictionary definition of bullying. "either restart trade with us or we'll nuke you till oblivion". Thank god Iran is nowhere near being able to bully anyone including the tiny uae.
Okay you write way too long something that could be summed up in a couple of sentences but I will respond to a couple of points I picked up in your speech:And what exactly would you call threatening to sanction anyone who trades with iran then,as chump has done?.Actually its not bullying its blackmail,and nuclear blackmail has the potential to be very,very effective,well it certainly appears to have worked rather well for the dprk so far,altho some of that you could no doubt chalk up to chumps monstrous vanity and ego and the no doubt rightly justified fears of the rok that they might wind up as the dead meat[barbecued?] in a dprk/us nuke sandwich.Ultimately the europeans would have to decidewhos interests they were going to put first,theirs or us+israel.Its one thing to cut ones throat economically for usrael but would you be prepared to risk seeing western europe laid wasted for the third time in a century or even just the threat of a return to MAD as it was during the dark days of the early 80s cold war?,I suspect many europeans would not,however when one has lived as a vassal statefor decades it is not such an easy task to suddenly start to act and think as an independent state and put ones own interests first.
Personally I would refer to this strategy as Plata O Plutonio,which means silver or plutonium,its a play on the expression plata o plomo,which is used by killers working for the mexican drug cartels who make this offer to potential victims,it means silver or lead,as in choose one ie take the money[bribe] or take the lead[bullets],from what I`ve heard most take the money.
Unfortunately for iran rouhani&co have just had to relearn an old,old lesson of history,and that is:APPEASEMENT DOESNT WORK,just ask neville chamberlain he`ll tell you that.
1-When you`re threatening other countries over their choice of trading partner then that is bullying pure and simple.Its quite alright for the us to say to iran we arent going to trade with you,however its not alright for the us to then threaten anyone else who trades with iran with sanctions,indeed some would probably consider that to be economic warfare.Okay you write way too long something that could be summed up in a couple of sentences but I will respond to a couple of points I picked up in your speech:
1- threatening to sanction does not make the US a bully. They are simply saying "if you wanna do business with them, we won't do business with you". It is actually one of the most civil ways of dealing with a country you dont like. It is completely opposite of threatening to nuke them.
2- you think it has worked for dprk? ABSOLUTELY NOTHING ever has worked for dprk. They are fucking starving.
3- everything in this forum is a testameny to why Iran will never be allowed to have a nuke. Because as you said irans first objective after getting the nukes will be to threaten everyone they disagree with, with nuking them.