Philip the Arab
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2018
- Messages
- 7,430
- Reaction score
- 6
- Country
- Location
How so?Nice example of a inferiority complex . lol
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How so?Nice example of a inferiority complex . lol
Who rebuilt the Ka'aba? Ismael an Arabized Arab therefor it is an Arab place.
From an academic point of view, it is difficult to find answers to such questions. The history remained in history.I never knew about this to be honest. A Turkish-Iraqi confederation interesting to be honest I wonder if that happened in reality how different Turkey and Iraq would be.
There never was any "occupation" as Ottoman (no such thing to begin with as most "Ottomans" were Arabs and "Ottoman language" was another Arabic dialect, culture was mostly Arabic, alphabet, architecture, cuisine (modern-day Turkish cuisine owns most of its dishes to gaining access to Arab lands post-1517, whole bureaucracy was stolen/copied from previous much more bigger and influential Arab Caliphates (Rashidun, Umayyad, Abbasid, Fatimid) as were the titles and most of the territory) as the "Ottoman" presence (in Arabia) was limited to a few military garrisons where mostly local "Ottoman" soldiers were present and that too only in Hijaz and for less than 50 years in the Eastern Province. The ruler was the Sharif of Makkah and Madinah (Hijaz as a whole) as under previous caliphates. Rest of KSA was made up various kingdoms, sultanates, emirates, imamates, sheikdoms etc.
To make it short, "Ottoman" was as much an Arab entity (if not more) as it was "Turkish" (let us not forget that most Anatolians are actually just Turkified and Arabized people - the Ottoman ruling family were originally nomadic Turks living in Syria and since they took power, they constantly intermarried with foreigners so today they are less than 2% Turkic if that can do it - a Google search should confirm this).
In any case, if some kind of imaginary "Arab betrayal" is taught in schools in Turkey, every single of the 20+ Arab countries should be teaching about the "Ottoman" betrayal in 1517, where they stole the Caliphate after 1000 years of Arab rule (Rashidun, Umayyad, Abbasid, Fatimid) and during 90% + of all the Islamic conquests and during the Islamic Golden Age.
It is without question that 400 years of "Ottoman" presence in PARTS of the Arab world (far from the majority) was overall a dark age for Arabs and 100 years later we are still under this negative influence. In fact it began earlier than that. When the savage Mongols destroyed Islamic civilization as we knew it, 250 years prior. The Muslim world has not since recovered.
EDIT: Hijaz as well as all of Makkah and Madinah are 5000+ year old Hijazi cities inhabited by native Hijazi, so obviously this is 100% Arabian/Arab/Semitic lands and people and KSA is an Arabian/Arab/Semitic country and the House of Saud is an local Arabian dynasty that will have 1 billion times more legitimacy over Hijaz than any non-Arab dynasty.
Prophet Ibrahim (AS) was a Semite and all Semites originate from Arabia. He and his blessed prodigy moved back to Hijaz almost 5000 years ago and that is where monotheism was first practiced in the world.
And Allah (swt) himself thourgh Prophet Muhamad (saws) gave the honor of being keepers of the Kaaba to 1 Hijazi Arab family. Banu Shaiba.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bani_Shaiba
So we Arabs have ALWAYS been the custodians of Makkah and Madinah and will continue to be so until the end of times.
BTW Middle East Monitor is an anti-KSA propaganda " news channel" and although I doubt the authenticity of this news, I personally hope that it is correct, as decades of pan-Islamist propaganda has refused to talk of the numerous negative consequences of the "Ottoman" presence in the Arab world. Printing being banned, certain regions being forcefully neglected in order to keep them ignorant etc. Indeed, this was the dark age of the Arabs, as many Arab intellectuals have spoken about for ages from Morocco to Oman. Once Arabic was the language of science and the foremost universities in the entire world were located in the Arab world. What happened during the "Ottoman" presence for 400 years in comparison, everyone can answer for themselves if they know just 1 bit of history.
Ottoman Empire has been dead for like 90+ years and you arabs are still pathetic lol
>Ottomans are Arab
>The Ottomans made us Arabs go through a dark age
Pick one.
Lol the Ottomans political beaucracy was much more different than the Arab caliphates.
less kurds
What he told you is bogus. There was never any such attempt. It was mostly fantasy from some of the post-Ottoman beuracrats (most of them of Caucasian origins) who kept some of their influence after the Ottoman collapse. Not less Kurds, as there are 2-3 times as many Kurds in Turkey as in Iraq.
I didn't read it.
The only solution is to Arabize and export Islam, I believe Iraq's major population growth will Arabize the (north)-eastern frontier of the region in the long-term. The Arab world will grow, we will succeed.
Nah G MENA is our domain.Maybe keep your race to yourselves and just export the Islam.
I didn't read it.
The only solution is to Arabize and export Islam, I believe Iraq's major population growth will Arabize the (north)-eastern frontier of the region in the long-term. The Arab world will grow, we will succeed.
Nah G MENA is our domain.
Nah G MENA is our domain.
Excluding Christians and Jews(Not the invaders) much?It's domain to whatever Muslim ethnicity lives there. Kurds have as much as right to live there as you arabs.
Excluding Christians and Jews(Not the invaders) much?
Muslims can't have a "land". We are Arabs and mostly Semites who own the land.I accept they live there. But they don't rule, that's for Muslims in our lands.
Muslims can't have a "land". We are Arabs and mostly Semites who own the land.