What's new

Satanic Temple to distribute materials to school children in Florida

Thats Physics, which is an entirely different paradigm.

On topic | What is the title of a scientific mechanism which can be taken as an evidence in regards to the increase of genetic information in a given genetic mutation or evolutionary process?

Empirical evidence?
 
Your "guess" is patently false and intentionally malicious, as is usual and expected for you, Sir.

All religions are treated equally by law without fear or favor.
So it will be a shiny cool religion, right?
Actually we know what it looks like: the FEMEN. They will blasphemate everybody except judaism

It will be a trojan for new pedophile laws like the news laws in France

This is called freedom, which we should be fighting for in our countries.
So i'am free to rob you? To call to kill you?:cheesy:
 
So it will be a shiny cool religion, right?
Actually we know what it looks like: the FEMEN. They will blasphemate everybody except judaism
It will be a trojan for new pedophile laws like the news laws in France

I think they will eat babies too. :D
 
Both creationism and evolution are 'theories', those who take both of them 'literally' are part of the moron pool.
That clearly shows that you don't know what "theory" means in science. In everyday useage, "theory" might mean something one is not sure of. But in Science, a theory is an explanation for observed facts. In fact theory is the highest formulation of an idea. In science, something becomes a theory only when sufficient understanding about the subject is obtained. To be a theory, there has to be an explanation of facts, and a demonstrable mechanism.

Creationism is by no means a theory. It needs a lot of work to make that a theory. Data should be collected, viable mechanisms should be proposed, each mechanism should be investigated, and once a complete understanding of the phenomenon is arrived at, THEN it will be a theory in the scientific sense. Just saying "god did it, end of story" does not make a theory, it just makes a (very short) story.

In short, in Science, if something is a theory, that means we know almost everything about it. You share a common misunderstanding, and so scientists have taken great pains to explain this point.

Evolution, like gravitation, is both theory and fact. There are facts of evolution, and then there is a theory to explain the facts. The facts of evolution are the clearly evidenced change of organisms. The theory is very complex. One theory was proposed by Darwin, and he also gave a mechanism (natural selection), but today the theory has been refined a lot, and the mechanism is understood more in terms of genetics. But the facts are the same. Go through this link to understand why something has to be BOTH a theory and a fact, not one or the other.

Evolution as fact and theory - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The best explanation for laypersons was provided by Stephen Jay Gould:

"Evolution is a theory. It is also a fact. And facts and theories are different things, not rungs in a hierarchy of increasing certainty. Facts are the world's data. Theories are structures of ideas that explain and interpret facts. Facts do not go away when scientists debate rival theories to explain them. Einstein's theory of gravitation replaced Newton's, but apples did not suspend themselves in mid-air, pending the outcome. And humans evolved from ape-like ancestors whether they did so by Darwin's proposed mechanism or by some other yet to be discovered."[
 
Last edited:
That clearly shows that you don't know what "theory" means in science. In everyday useage, "theory" might mean something one is not sure of. But in Science, a theory is an explanation for observed facts. In fact theory is the highest formulation of an idea. In science, something becomes a theory only when sufficient understanding about the subject is obtained. To be a theory, there has to be an explanation of facts, and a demonstrable mechanism.

Creationism is by no means a theory. It needs a lot of work to make that a theory. Data should be collected, viable mechanisms should be proposed, each mechanism should be investigated, and once a complete understanding of the phenomenon is arrived at, THEN it will be a theory in the scientific sense. Just saying "god did it, end of story" does not make a theory, it just makes a (very short) story.

In short, in Science, if something is a theory, that means we know almost everything about it. You share a common misunderstanding, and so scientists have taken great pains to explain this point.

Evolution, like gravitation, is both theory and fact. There are facts of evolution, and then there is a theory to explain the facts. The facts of evolution are the clearly evidenced change of organisms. The theory is very complex. One theory was proposed by Darwin, and he also gave a mechanism (natural selection), but today the theory has been refined a lot, and the mechanism is understood more in terms of genetics. But the facts are the same. Go through this link to understand why something has to be BOTH a theory and a fact, not one or the other.

Evolution as fact and theory - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The best explanation for laypersons was provided by Stephen Jay Gould:
actually you can not prove a theory to be true, you can only falsify it, just provide one single evidence against it and theory is disproved. Theory of gravitation is considered as fact because all known observed phenomenas follows it, if you identify find one single phenomenon which doesn't follow theory of gravitation, it will be disproved.
 
actually you can not prove a theory to be true, you can only falsify it, just provide one single evidence against it and theory is disproved. Theory of gravitation is considered as fact because all known observed phenomenas follows it, if you identify find one single phenomenon which doesn't follow theory of gravitation, it will be disproved.

A theory is the most perfect explanation possible for all known facts.
 
Last edited:
actually you can not prove a theory to be true, you can only falsify it, just provide one single evidence against it and theory is disproved. Theory of gravitation is considered as fact because all known observed phenomenas follows it, if you identify find one single phenomenon which doesn't follow theory of gravitation, it will be disproved.

I know. I did not say anything about proving a theory. I was explaining what a theory is, in the first place.

And by the way, EVERY scientific theory has to be falsifiable - that is one of the most important characterestics of a theory, to be considered scientific. In other words, anybody who makes a theory has to say clearly what observation can potentially dissprove it. Einstein's special theory of relativity was finally accepted as a theory when that famous light bending observation was made in 1919.

In science, there is no such thing as "proof" - that only exists in logic and mathematics. In science, evidence is what matters, not proof.

Creationism is not a scientific theory, simply by the criterion of falsifiability (that's just one reason). A creationist cannot say "If so and so is observed, then creationism is wrong". On the other hand, evolution is very much falsifiable. I don't remember which scientist it was, when asked how evolution is falsifiable, he said "Rabbits in the precambrian!"

What is a Scientific Theory? | Definition of Theory
Scientific theory - RationalWiki
Scientific theory - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Falsifiability - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Falsifiability - Karl Popper's Basic Scientific Principle
Falsifiability
 
We treat all religions equal. Satanism equal to Islam or Christianity if not superior to them.

No religion is superior to others in eye of the law.

Those who want it to be otherwise, can move back to the hole they came from and live there believing their religious superiority all they like.

Hey, if you do not like Satansim, there is always Pastafarianism: The only problem is you have to wear a colander on your head. :D

Pastafarian woman wears colander on her head in driving license photo - Weird News - News - The Independent

Pastafarian woman wears colander on her head in driving license photo

Shawna Hammond said the colander represents her religious freedom

Thursday 11 September 2014


A woman’s driving license has caught national attention after she was reportedly allowed to wear a colander on her head because of her Pastafarian beliefs.

Shawna Hammond, a Pastafarian from Oklahoma, said that despite being given a "funny look" when she turned up for her license photo, she was still allowed to wear it for the picture.

Oklahoma law requires people to remove anything that may obscure their face for pictures.

She told KFOR: “It doesn’t cover my face. I mean you can still see my face. We have to take off our glasses, so I took off my glasses.

"For me the colander represents freedom, our freedom of religion, and to whatever religion we prefer or lack of religion.

"It’s hard living as a non-religious person in Oklahoma. It felt good to be recognized that we can all coexist and have those equal rights,” she said.

It comes after Pastafarian Minister Christopher Schaeffer was sworn into the Pomfret New York Town Council with a colander on his head in January.

Mr Schaeffer, a minister for the Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster (FSM) took his oath of office before the board's recreational meeting on Thursday afternoon.

According the FSM's website, the church existed in secrecy until 2005 when the publication of a letter, complete with a drawing of the spaghetti monster that had been sent to a school board in Kansas.

The website insists Pastafarianism is a real religion, whose followers believe that pirates were the original Pastafarians and "were peaceful explorers and it was due to Christian misinformation that they have an image of outcast criminals today".

The church's website explains: “By design, the only dogma allowed in the Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster is the rejection of dogma."

===========

If you don't like wearing a colander on your head, there is always the Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster. :lol:
 
Hey, if you do not like Satansim, there is always Pastafarianism: The only problem is you have to wear a colander on your head

If you don't like wearing a colander on your head, there is always the Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster.

You ignorant infidel, the Church of the Flying Sphaghetti Monster is the temple of the Pastafarians. FSM and Pastafarianism are not two, but one. He who worships FSM is a pastafarian. The rest will burn in hell.

Ramen!
 
You ignorant infidel, the Church of the Flying Sphaghetti Monster is the temple of the Pastafarians. FSM and Pastafarianism are not two, but one. He who worships FSM is a pastafarian. The rest will burn in hell.

Ramen!

But spaghetti is not pasta, is it? I am confused now. :D
 
We treat all religions equal. Satanism equal to Islam or Christianity if not superior to them.

No religion is superior to others in eye of the law.

Those who want it to be otherwise, can move back to the hole they came from and live there believing their religious superiority all they like.
Satanism is not a religion. In all religions, there is the notion of Devil, and it has never been worshipped. It was until the zionist sect took total control of the West and impose this cult

We have the impression that this must happen, because all the worst laws have been imposed with no problems. An impression that the Devil is slowly taking control of the society

All of this because in the JEWISH eschatology, they must make all the evil possible so the Messy comes
let them be and do it.. its not my country they can do whatever they want to.. even if they really belive in satan..
:cheesy:
 
Curse on you Unbelievers- Spaghetti and Pasta are both manifestations of one supreme being.

Now wash your sins away with a trip to Olive Garden, and commit the ritual of Pastapology.

And Absolutely no Noodles, its and impostor of Pasta, and so shall be called Impasta. :D

With or without marinara sauce? Please guide me on how to repent best.
 
Back
Top Bottom