Sania Mirza to marry Shoaib Malik?

[Goodperson]

YouTube - Shoaib Malik & Sania Mirza Press Conference


Confident couple.

Jab mian biwi raji to kya karega kazi?

 

[Skeptic]

Do read the entire report.............. invalid if fraud is alleged.

Not alleged but proven. I dont know why shoaib is not proving the fraud rather than claiming over and over. He seems pretty comfortable with a media trial otherwise.

Also, what is their ruling on her getting an abortion according to this
Law board?

For abortion law is same for all.
Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act 1971-When pregnancies may be terminated by registered medical practitioners
These are the rules.

 

[IMADreamer]

 

[Awesome]

Shoaib gets breather after top cleric says sharia doesn't recognise telephonic nikah - dnaindia.com

Karachi: A top Pakistani cleric, mufti Muhammad Naeem, has said that Islamic sharia (doctrine) does not recognise "any relationship which cannot be trusted".

He was referring to cricketer Shoaib Malik’s alleged telephonic marriage with a Hyderabad-based girl, Ayesha Siddiqui.

Naeem said that according to the sharia, the accounts of eyewitnesses are obligatory for verification of nikah (marriage).

“The acceptance of both bride and groom in front of eyewitnesses is necessary as per sharia. Telephonic testimony is not trustworthy according to the sharia and neither is there any standing about the acceptance of the groom,” The News quoted Naeem as saying.

The remarks come amidst allegations from the Siddiqui family that Shoaib Malik is already married to Ayesha, and that he has cheated her by announcing his marriage to tennis star Sania Mirza.

The controversy surrounding the star sports couple's marriage has seen several twists and turns.

Meanwhile, the Siddiqui family has served a legal notice on Malik alleging that he had married Ayesha in 2002 and must come clean on the first marriage before tying the knot with Mirza.

The family has sent a legal notice to the Maliks on grounds of defamation, harassment, character assassination, and fraud.

The legal notice comes after the cricketer's brother-in-law Imran Zafar Malik told a private television channel that they had hired counsel in New Delhi to take legal action against the Hyderabad-based Siddiqui family.

Imran Malik agreed that Shoaib Malik had got engaged to Ayesha but said the Siddiquis had shown a photograph of another girl at the time of engagement.

On Friday, the controversy took another ugly turn when the Siddiqui family came out with what it claimed was Shoaib and Ayesha’s marriage certificate.

Pakistani television channels flashed the ‘alleged’ nikahnama (marriage certificate), which apparently carried Shoaib's signature in the column for the groom and the name of Maha Siddiqui in the column for the bride.

“I have released this marriage certificate because Shoaib and his family have constantly been denying this marriage,” Ayesha told one Pakistani television channel on the telephone from Hyderabad.

 

[Skeptic]

Ayesha Nikahnama Doubtful | Document Invalid | Pak Islamic Experts | Telephonic Marriage - Oneindia News

Is the Mufti authorized to take the final call, or is there a framework of law to take care of these.

Like Muslim Personal Law Board in India.

We have so many of these muftis and scholars releasing fatwas, but whose decision will be the final word??

 

[Awesome]

Nikah or no Nikah, that should be the only question. Even if the Nikah is upheld, at max Shoaib would have to pay the agreed amount in the prenup and divorce her. He shouldn't be thrown into jail for it. Indians have brought in allegations of torture, cruelty, cheating on wife.

 

[Goodperson]

Shoaib gets breather after top cleric says sharia doesn't recognise telephonic nikah - dnaindia.com

Court go by evidence nobody is denying Nikah, Questions are only on validity Shoiab was a fool to sign Nikah in the first place.

Wait April 15th for marriage everything will be clarified.

 

[MZUBAIR]

In above video its cleard that Miss Maha/Ayesha is of 35 years age.
My goodness she is so older to Malik(28).

10 years back she was 25 and she was looking for a boy who was 18.

 

[Awesome]

Is the Mufti authorized to take the final call, or is there a framework of law to take care of these.

Like Muslim Personal Law Board in India.

We have so many of these muftis and scholars releasing fatwas, but whose decision will be the final word??

If the Nikah is considered invalid, what are the Siddiqui's pissed off about again? They said they don't want any money except for a divorce so that their daughter can remarry. Grand Mufti's have given their blessing that she is not in wedlock and can marry.

Again, what is the problem that the Siddiquis have now?

 

[Goodperson]

Nikah or no Nikah, that should be the only question. Even if the Nikah is upheld, at max Shoaib would have to pay the agreed amount in the prenup and divorce her. He shouldn't be thrown into jail for it. Indians have brought in allegations of torture, cruelty, cheating on wife.

Agreed Muslims cannot be put in Jail unlike persons of other religions, Shoaib can very well give Talaq. I thinks thats what Ayesha and her family want.
But I am more worried on other sections which are registered against him he can put in Jail for that. Best thing is Shoib should make settlement with the girl.

I saw copy of Nikah displayed in Media the Meher amount is mere Rs 500.

 

[Hammy007]

]Jab mian biwi raji to kya karega kaji?[/B]

hhahahahahahahahaha lol

 

[Skeptic]

Nikah or no Nikah, that should be the only question. Even if the Nikah is upheld, at max Shoaib would have to pay the agreed amount in the prenup and divorce her. He shouldn't be thrown into jail for it. Indians have brought in allegations of torture, cruelty, cheating on wife.

Not Indian, but Siddiqui Family. Why are you flaming the issue, i dont get it.

Say IF and a BIG IF the Nikaah is valid, is it not a mental torture for a husband to deny that he ever had a nikaah and is it not mental harassment that he's rediculing the family in public??

Id denying the marriage and denying the rights of a wife not a crime..

Else all the men will have it very easy.. **** and forget eh...

terrible.

 

[Awesome]

Nikah over phone not valid, says Darul Uloom

NEW DELHI, Apr 05, 2010 (Hindustan Times - McClatchy-Tribune Information Services via COMTEX) -- For tennis player Sania Mirza and her partner Shoaib Malik, the Pakistani cricketer accused of dumping an Indian girl he married over the phone, the following could be music to the ears.

A Muslim marriage, or nikah, over the phone is not valid and best avoided, according to the Darul Uloom, a Muslim theological school of the Sunni sect to which Sania and Shoaib belong.

According to the seminary, a nikah over the phone stands on "shaky religious ground".



The Deoband-based Darul Uloom's interpretation of Islamic law is widely followed in Pakistan and India.

Darul Uloom spokesperson Adil Siddiqui said the "authentic position" on nikah over the phone was covered by Darul's fatwa or edict number 310/N. The edict reads: "If Eijab and Qubool (proposal of marriage from girl to boy and his acceptance of the same) are made on phone or internet, then it is not right, since in nikah it is compulsory that the Eijab and Qubool are made (from boy and girl or from their representatives) in a meeting before two witnesses. It is also necessary for witnesses to hear this conversation." Moreover, the groom and bride have to ascertain each other's identities satisfactorily, former Darul vice-rector Qari Mohammed Usman said.

However, if nikah on the phone is unavoidable, the girl and boy could appoint vakil or representatives. In any case, the strict condition is that at least the Eijab and Qubool and the witnesses must all be present at one place, Darul scholars said.

Shoaib had shelved marriage plans with Hyderabad-based Ayesha Siddiqui. However, the girl's family has claimed that the duo entered wedlock through nikah over the phone in 2002. Shoaib has denied he ever met Ayesha and said she cheated him by sending someone else's photograph.

The Siddiqui family, which is pressing for divorce, must prove that witnesses on either side were present at one place when the telephone nikah took place.

If the bride is not the same person as the one with whom nikah is intended, as Shoaib has claimed, then the marriage is null and void, retired vice-rector of Darul Uloom Qari Mohammed Usman said.

 

[Skeptic]

Nikah over phone not valid, says Darul Uloom

NEW DELHI, Apr 05, 2010 (Hindustan Times - McClatchy-Tribune Information Services via COMTEX) -- For tennis player Sania Mirza and her partner Shoaib Malik, the Pakistani cricketer accused of dumping an Indian girl he married over the phone, the following could be music to the ears.

A Muslim marriage, or nikah, over the phone is not valid and best avoided, according to the Darul Uloom, a Muslim theological school of the Sunni sect to which Sania and Shoaib belong.

According to the seminary, a nikah over the phone stands on "shaky religious ground".



The Deoband-based Darul Uloom's interpretation of Islamic law is widely followed in Pakistan and India.

Darul Uloom spokesperson Adil Siddiqui said the "authentic position" on nikah over the phone was covered by Darul's fatwa or edict number 310/N. The edict reads: "If Eijab and Qubool (proposal of marriage from girl to boy and his acceptance of the same) are made on phone or internet, then it is not right, since in nikah it is compulsory that the Eijab and Qubool are made (from boy and girl or from their representatives) in a meeting before two witnesses. It is also necessary for witnesses to hear this conversation." Moreover, the groom and bride have to ascertain each other's identities satisfactorily, former Darul vice-rector Qari Mohammed Usman said.

However, if nikah on the phone is unavoidable, the girl and boy could appoint vakil or representatives. In any case, the strict condition is that at least the Eijab and Qubool and the witnesses must all be present at one place, Darul scholars said.

Shoaib had shelved marriage plans with Hyderabad-based Ayesha Siddiqui. However, the girl's family has claimed that the duo entered wedlock through nikah over the phone in 2002. Shoaib has denied he ever met Ayesha and said she cheated him by sending someone else's photograph.

The Siddiqui family, which is pressing for divorce, must prove that witnesses on either side were present at one place when the telephone nikah took place.

If the bride is not the same person as the one with whom nikah is intended, as Shoaib has claimed, then the marriage is null and void, retired vice-rector of Darul Uloom Qari Mohammed Usman said.

Exactly what I said. Many clerics and Muftis in India have repeated this, but final word is from Personal Law Board.

They have said - Nikaah is invalid only if fraud is proven, which is not YET.

 

[Awesome]

Not Indian, but Siddiqui Family. Why are you flaming the issue, i dont get it.

Say IF and a BIG IF the Nikaah is valid, is it not a mental torture for a husband to deny that he ever had a nikaah and is it not mental harassment that he's rediculing the family in public??

Id denying the marriage and denying the rights of a wife not a crime..

Else all the men will have it very easy.. **** and forget eh...

terrible.

All divorces are then straining mentally. She needs a shrink if you she thinks she can pin the same IPC on him that is used for honor killing husbands for mental stress.