What's new

Samsung helps AT&T fraud: placing fake 5G logo on mobile phones running on non-5G networks

Wow, your source of information should give you a gold medal.

Again, if you have problem with the source, go talk to them and blast them with "China is Great" or whatever you want and have them bump you to 98% you claim, that's your business.

I did not make up that data, you have a problem with that, call them, not me.
 
.
The thread is about China 4G or AT&T misuse 5G Logo?

And YOU are the one that brought China 4G on this, not me.
No I said the truth which Australia has a backward 4G network coverage but you insist your source is right whatever China gov or agency say or whatever China efforts made to improve it!

Again, if you have problem with the source, go talk to them and blast them with "China is Great" or whatever you want and have them bump you to 98% you claim, that's your business.

I did not make up that data, you have a problem with that, call them, not me.
I have problem with you coz you refered them,which is not correct any more but you insist on it!
 
.
No I said the truth which Australia has a backward 4G network coverage but you insist your source is right whatever China gov or agency say or whatever China efforts made to improve it!

My source is right, because that is a REPUTED organisation, you think they are wrong, you go talk to them about "China is Great" or whatever, don't talk to me about it.

And what truth about Australia backward 4G coverage? Because you said so, it automatically become "Truth" what are you? My mom or God?
 
. .
I have problem with you coz you refered them,which is not correct any more but you insist on it!

Again, if you think they are incorrect, call them and have them change, why you talk to me about that? Can I change their detail?

Dude, you are funny.

You said it again: if you have problem with the source, go talk to them and blast them!
So you start to not beleive them youself in 2018.

Again, I. DON'T. CARE.

I BELIEVE in what I write, you believe in they are wrong, that's not my business, I did not own the site nor would I have any capability to change it. So if you think they are wrong, that's your business. I never said they are wrong or not considering Chinese "Construction Might" you said that, then you need to contact them.

for me, I. DON'T. CARE.
 
.
My source is right, because that is a REPUTED organisation, you think they are wrong, you go talk to them about "China is Great" or whatever, don't talk to me about it.

And what truth about Australia backward 4G coverage? Because you said so, it automatically become "Truth" what are you? My mom or God?
No,I am just a Chinese with a PHD in French(La langue francaise).And your source is denitely wrong!

Again, if you think they are incorrect, call them and have them change, why you talk to me about that? Can I change their detail?

Dude, you are funny.



Again, I. DON'T. CARE.

I BELIEVE in what I write, you believe in they are wrong, that's not my business, I did not own the site nor would I have any capability to change it. So if you think they are wrong, that's your business. I never said they are wrong or not considering Chinese "Construction Might" you said that, then you need to contact them.

for me, I. DON'T. CARE.
I. DON'T. CARE. what if you care or not!

Again, if you think they are incorrect, call them and have them change, why you talk to me about that? Can I change their detail?

Dude, you are funny.



Again, I. DON'T. CARE.

I BELIEVE in what I write, you believe in they are wrong, that's not my business, I did not own the site nor would I have any capability to change it. So if you think they are wrong, that's your business. I never said they are wrong or not considering Chinese "Construction Might" you said that, then you need to contact them.

for me, I. DON'T. CARE.
Still you are wrong with the data you refered to!
 
. .
Then go write a letter or send a bomb to their office, why are you talking to me for.

lol PhD in French? What does that have to do with anything here?
We Chinese are peace-loving people and never mail bombs unless you send them first.

For the 9th time, GO TALK TO THEM IF YOU THINK THEY ARE WRONG and see if they change. Otherwise I have no interest in continue this endless debate that wasn't even on topic to begin with.

You can go ahead and claim anything you want, but at the end of the day, I don't really care
Still you are wrong with the data you refered to!
 
.
what can I say, you post a stupid thread, you expect stupid response.
Long ago when I was young I tried to make distant calls with two empty coke cans connected by a thin plastic wire. My first ever 5g coke phone :-)

Luckily pdf did not exist back then. Otherwise China will sue me because of patent violation.
 
.
. .
This insult is uncalled for

@waz @Slav Defence @Oscar @The Eagle
This is not an insult. In international politics and diplomacy, Australia does not have sovereignty.The guidance and advice of Americans is Australia's foreign policy.

When somebody can't debate in a civilized matter and resorts to insults... well, you know..
You think the Viva Viet guy is a civilized guy while continuing post we kill many chineses in 2013 intenal chaos and we shot PLA to death?
Do not make americain double standard too obvious please!

This insult is uncalled for

@waz @Slav Defence @Oscar @The Eagle
Well my mistake,I should not use running dog,this is not the correct word,Minion is the best word to use.
You are under the so called Military protection of US ,no?
 
.
When somebody can't debate in a civilized matter and resorts to insults... well, you know..

lol, look at him trying to defend his "action", just wondering, he done what his emperor Xi told, so I wonder if, by his own "Interpretation" it should not be an insult to call him a running dog too. I doubt he have sovereignty right.

There are no better way to shoot himself in the foot than that I reckon.
 
.
lol, look at him trying to defend his "action", just wondering, he done what his emperor Xi told, so I wonder if, by his own "Interpretation" it should not be an insult to call him a running dog too. I doubt he have sovereignty right.

There are no better way to shoot himself in the foot than that I reckon.
1) The double standards of your Americans and Australia and the ability to turn black into white are very powerful. Chinese people think that they are inferior and need to learn from you.
For example, the United States said in 2003 that Iraq has weapons of mass destruction. Britain said, yes, Iraq has. Australia also said: Yes, Iraq has. New Zealand also said: Yes, Iraq has. Canada also said: Yes. Iraq has.
Unfortunately, the fact is: Until now, where are the weapons of mass destruction of Saddam? The fact is: The United States smashed a country without United Nations permission and executed the leader of the country.

2) Back to the topic, Samsung and AT&T are displaying their network signals with the so-called inexplicable 5G E, and AT&T is actually unable to provide 5G network services at least for the moment. Samsung and AT&T are suspected of misleading consumers with illegal false propaganda (LTE- A is not a 5G network).


When somebody can't debate in a civilized matter and resorts to insults... well, you know..
1) The double standards of your Americans and Australia and the ability to turn black into white are very powerful. Chinese people think that they are inferior and need to learn from you. Americains has nothing to do with civilized.
For example, the United States said in 2003 that Iraq has weapons of mass destruction. Britain said, yes, Iraq has. Australia also said: Yes, Iraq has. New Zealand also said: Yes, Iraq has. Canada also said: Yes. Iraq has.
Unfortunately, the fact is: Until now, where are the weapons of mass destruction of Saddam? The fact is: The United States smashed a country without United Nations permission and executed the leader of the country.

2) Back to the topic, Samsung and AT&T are displaying their network signals with the so-called inexplicable 5G E, and AT&T is actually unable to provide 5G network services at least for the moment. Samsung and AT&T are suspected of misleading consumers with illegal false propaganda (LTE- A is not a 5G network).
 
.
1) The double standards of your Americans and Australia and the ability to turn black into white are very powerful. We Chinese people think that they are inferior and need to learn from you.
For example, the United States said in 2003 that Iraq has weapons of mass destruction. Britain said, yes, Iraq has. Australia also said: Yes, Iraq has. New Zealand also said: Yes, Iraq has. Canada also said: Yes. Iraq has.
Unfortunately, the fact is: Until now, where are the weapons of mass destruction of Saddam? The fact is: The United States smashed a country without United Nations permission and executed the leader of the country.

2) Back to the topic, Samsung and AT&T are displaying their network signals with the so-called inexplicable 5G E, and AT&T is actually unable to provide 5G network services at least for the moment. Samsung and AT&T are suspected of misleading consumers with illegal false propaganda (LTE- A is not a 5G network).

1.) You do know they have found Sarin and other Chemical weapon in Iraq, right? They may be "expired" as Iraq claim, but I dare you to walk into these "Expired" stockpile without MOPP gear and Gasmask. And please stop justifying your insult.

2.) 5GE is not 5G, nobody on AT&T claim it was 5G, and most importantly, THEY DID NOT USE THE 5G REGISTERED TRADEMARK. So there are no "misrepresentation" here. as I said, Telstra have something called 4GX and is written with ANYPHONE that's on it, including ZTE and Huawei, so did Huawei and Telstra should also be suspected for misleading? Because there are no such things as 4G plus or 4GX network.
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom