What's new

Sam Manekshaw: Remembering the Greatest Soldier India Ever Knew

Stephen Cohen

BANNED
Joined
Nov 21, 2014
Messages
8,456
Reaction score
-37
Country
India
Location
India
Sam Manekshaw: Remembering the Greatest Soldier India Ever Knew

Sam Manekshaw was arguably the greatest soldier the Indian Army has ever produced.

As the Chief of the Army Staff, Sam’s service to the nation is immense as he united the army, navy and air force into a team, helping India win against Pakistan in 1965 and even more significantly the 1971 Indo-Pakistani war that led to the liberation of Bangladesh.

On the day of his 8th death anniversary, The Quint takes a look at the most remarkable stories from Sam Bahadur’s life.


The Story Behind the Name

Born to Parsi parents, Hormusji Manekshaw and Heerabai, on 3 April 1914 in Amritsar, India’s First Field Marshall, Sam Hormusji Framji Jamshedji Manekshaw, also fondly known as Sam Bahadur was initially given the name Cyrus.

But one of his aunts changed it to Sam, because she had heard that a Parsi called Cyrus had been sent to jail, and she considered the name would prove unlucky for her nephew.


When Sam Wanted to Become a Doctor

Sam, who completed his education from Punjab and Sherwood College in Nainital, with distinction in the School Certificate examination of the Cambridge Board, had requested his father to send him to London so that he can study medicine.

However, his father didn’t grant his wish saying that he was too young to stay abroad on his own.

In an act of rebellion, Manekshaw sat for the Indian Military Academy’s (IMA) entrance examination and as a result, became part of the first intake of 40 cadets on 1 October 1932 in Dehradun.


Sam the Army Man

Sam Manekshaw was an Indian military leader who was the first Indian Army officer to be promoted to the rank of Field Marshal. His distinguished military career spanned four decades and five wars, beginning with the British Indian Army during World War II.

Manekshaw rose to be the 8th Chief of Staff of the Indian Army in 1969 and under his leadership, Indian forces liberated Bangladesh in December 1971 in just 13 days.


The Day That Sam Got Shot Nine Times

Manekshaw’s first major military campaign was in World War II when he served as a captain with the 4/12 Frontier Force Regiment in Burma in 1942. In the battle for the Sittang bridge, Sam Bahadur inspired his troops to victory against the Japanese.

During the offensive, in which he led from the front, Sam fell to the ground after being shot at nine times but he kept on encouraging his soldiers to fight, ultimately clinching the crucial Sittang bridge.

When the Divisional Commander, Sir Cowans, heard of Sam’s bravery, the General rushed to the battle site, took off his own Military Cross and pinned it on Sam’s chest anointing him with the gallantry medal which is awarded to the living.


When Sam Bahadur Died

Sam’s outspoken behaviour and his tiffs with the bureaucracy meant that India’s greatest general never received the respect he truly deserved. For much of his life, he was not accorded the benefits and status due to a Field Marshal.

Sadly, Sam Manekshaw was not afforded respect in death too. When Field Marshal Sam Manekshaw died, none of the three Service Chiefs attended the funeral to pay their last respects. The then Defence Minister AK Antony was also absent.

Sam and Indira Gandhi

Contrary to popular belief, Sam had a great working relationship with Indira Gandhi. On the eve of the war with Pakistan in December 1971 that led to the creation of Bangladesh, India’s Prime Minister, Indira Gandhi, asked Manekshaw if he was ready for the fight.

Sam, in his trademark style, replied saying, “I am always ready, sweetie.”

At another time when Sam was questioned by a tense Indira if rumours of a planned coup by the Army Chief were indeed true, Sam shot off a brilliant reply.

You mind your own business, I’ll mind mine. You kiss your own sweetheart, I’ll kiss mine. I don’t interfere politically, as long as nobody interferes with me in the Army.

Sam’s Red James Motorcycle

At the time of the partition, Manekshaw and Agha Muhammad Yahya Khan were together on the staff of Field Marshal Sir Claude Auchinleck, helping with the extra administrative duties that the partition brought along with it.

Sam owned a red James motorcycle which Yahya always fancied. When the two parted ways after the partition, Yahya offered to buy the motorcycle for a princely sum of Rs 1,000 which he promised to send over from Pakistan.

As it turns out, Yahya never really got around to sending the money. After the 1971 victory, Sam who led India to victory against President Yahya Khan’s Pakistan said:

" Yahya never paid me the Rs 1,000 for my motorbike, but now he has paid with half his country."


http://www.thequint.com/india/2016/...membering-the-greatest-soldier-india-ever-had

 
helping India win against Pakistan in 1965

Who asked for the ceasefire? India.
Who's Prime Minister got a heart attack afterwards? India.
Who's Air Force was on the brink of collapse? India.
Who was 4 times their adversaries size militarily? India.

India lost, and in 17 days too.

Oh and if anyone brings up 1971:

1. Bangladesh is minuscule in size compared to Pakistan.
2. It was almost a continent away, so it was impossible for us to support our guys there.
3. It was an underdeveloped wasteland, we mostly just lost prestige.
4. India joined near the end of the war, when the Pakistani military started struggling.
5. India suffered higher casualties.
6. We still have numerous Indian POW's from 71 (although most of them are likely dead by now).
 
Who asked for the ceasefire? India.
Who's Prime Minister got a heart attack afterwards? India.
Who's Air Force was on the brink of collapse? India.
Who was 4 times their adversaries size militarily? India.

India lost, and in 17 days too.

Oh and if anyone brings up 1971:

1. Bangladesh is minuscule in size compared to Pakistan.
2. It was almost a continent away, so it was impossible for us to support our guys there.
3. It was an underdeveloped wasteland, we mostly just lost prestige.
4. India joined near the end of the war, when the Pakistani military started struggling.
5. India suffered higher casualties.
6. We still have numerous Indian POW's from 71 (although most of them are likely dead by now).
yeah ! if you would win 1965 war Indian kashmir would have been part of Pakistan !
 
yeah ! if you would win 1965 war Indian kashmir would have been part of Pakistan !

Who crossed the border on September the 6th? India.
Who's objective was to conquer Lahore? India.
Did India succeed? No.

Our objective was never to conquer Indian Kashmir, it was always to defend ourselves. We did so with relative ease.
 
Oh and if anyone brings up 1971:

1. Bangladesh is minuscule in size compared to Pakistan.
2. It was almost a continent away, so it was impossible for us to support our guys there.
3. It was an underdeveloped wasteland, we mostly just lost prestige.
4. India joined near the end of the war, when the Pakistani military started struggling.
5. India suffered higher casualties.
6. We still have numerous Indian POW's from 71 (although most of them are likely dead by now).

Interesting.. this is possible a first among admissions of still holding on to Indian POWs .

Could you be so kind as to share details of these POWs ?

EP Pakistan was underdeveloped ?

close to 60 % of national exports came from there.
 
Interesting.. this is possible a first among admissions of still holding on to Indian POWs .

Could you be so kind as to share details of these POWs ?

EP Pakistan was underdeveloped ?

close to 60 % of national exports came from there.

Here are just a few, your country abandoned these lot:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_missing_54

As for EP being underdeveloped, that was the major reason why they wanted independence.
 
Here are just a few, your country abandoned these lot:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_missing_54

As for EP being underdeveloped, that was the major reason why they wanted independence.


You are quoting an Indian source that says these men are still in Pak.
(This list was tabled in the Lok Sabha in 1979 by Samarendra Kundu, Minister of State of External Affairs, in reply to unstarred question 6803 raised by Amarsingh Pathawa.) Note - Initial list consisted of 40 names which later on expanded to 54)


In your post you admitted they were there. I want to know where they are since you say this with such certanity, something your govt denies.
 
Who crossed the border on September the 6th? India.
Who's objective was to conquer Lahore? India.
Did India succeed? No.

Our objective was never to conquer Indian Kashmir, it was always to defend ourselves. We did so with relative ease.

If you do not know the history, then the best thing to do is to keep quiet....... If you want to learn, There are enough materials available in this forum which could be used to enlighten yourself........

Edit : Reply to your post #2..... Congratulations on winning both 65 and 71 wars.......
 
India's only great movement came by way of supporting terrorists , what a great achievement
 
India's only great movement came by way of supporting terrorists , what a great achievement

And your moment of pride was by sending Army men in disguise of terrorists and later denying their bodies as an atmost disrespect any nation could do to its soldiers.We gave your martyrs their well deserved farewell which you as a country failed to do.Great Achievement.
 
If you do not know the history, then the best thing to do is to keep quiet....... If you want to learn, There are enough materials available in this forum which could be used to enlighten yourself........

Edit : Reply to your post #2..... Congratulations on winning both 65 and 71 wars.......

I never said we won in 1971, I just said your lot loves to exagerate how much you won.

As for 1965, our main objective was never to take all of Kashmir for ourselves. If your going to refer to the covert ops we did before the war where we supported militants there, those don't count because they were before the war started and a legitimate response to India starting skirmishes.

If we wanted to take Kashmir by force, we would have done it in 1962 when China was giving you a good whipping.

And your moment of pride was by sending Army men in disguise of terrorists and later denying their bodies as an atmost disrespect any nation could do to its soldiers.We gave your martyrs their well deserved farewell which you as a country failed to do.Great Achievement.

We didn't deny their bodies, that is Indian propaganda. India has never given an adequate source to prove these claims, but we on the other hand have evidence India did so in 71:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_missing_54

You are quoting an Indian source that says these men are still in Pak.
(This list was tabled in the Lok Sabha in 1979 by Samarendra Kundu, Minister of State of External Affairs, in reply to unstarred question 6803 raised by Amarsingh Pathawa.) Note - Initial list consisted of 40 names which later on expanded to 54)


In your post you admitted they were there. I want to know where they are since you say this with such certanity, something your govt denies.

No sh*t Sherlock the government will deny. If we didn't, your crazy government would invade us again and try to destroy us again.
 
I never said we won in 1971, I just said your lot loves to exagerate how much you won.

As for 1965, our main objective was never to take all of Kashmir for ourselves. If your going to refer to the covert ops we did before the war where we supported militants there, those don't count because they were before the war started and a legitimate response to India starting skirmishes.

If we wanted to take Kashmir by force, we would have done it in 1962 when China was giving you a good whipping.



We didn't deny their bodies, that is Indian propaganda. India has never given an adequate source to prove these claims, but we on the other hand have evidence India did so in 71:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_missing_54



No sh*t Sherlock the government will deny. If we didn't, your crazy government would invade us again and try to destroy us again.

If u wanted to take by force , WHY didn't u?

Also like @nair said u need to read up on ur own HISTORY!! Like OPERATION GIBRALTAR!!!
 
If u wanted to take by force , WHY didn't u?

Also like @nair said u need to read up on ur own HISTORY!! Like OPERATION GIBRALTAR!!!

We didn't want to take it by force, and I am familiar with operation Gibraltar, but that was a covert op where we sent troops to support local insurgents, and this was in response to India starting several skirmishes with us. The war officially started on September 6th, when India crossed the border. This op was prior to the war.
 
We didn't want to take it by force, and I am familiar with operation Gibraltar, but that was a covert op where we sent troops to support local insurgents, and this was in response to India starting several skirmishes with us. The war officially started on September 6th, when India crossed the border. This op was prior to the war.

By this logic, the 1971 war was started by Pakistan when PAF initiated the Operation Chengiz Khan, because before that, India was only “sending troops to support the local insurgents". So, my dear friend, do you see the blatant fallacy of your statement? An undeclared attack is still an attack. Operation Gibraltar and then Operation Grandslam were clear acts of aggression. Just because Pakistan govt didn't announce the war, doesn't mean they didn't start it.
 
Who asked for the ceasefire? India.
Who's Prime Minister got a heart attack afterwards? India.
Who's Air Force was on the brink of collapse? India.
Who was 4 times their adversaries size militarily? India.


Lmao, you covertly tried to take Kashmir, this was tipped off by locals(oh the irony). India commence to destroy militia, you bring in your military into Kashmir, but ended up defended Punjab. Utter failure and a total waste of time on your part. Let's not even kid.

India is 4 times bigger, but an almost isolated country, with good relations to losers(USSR), with weak socialist economy. You had the support of everyone, with a better economy, yet you still couldnt do anything.
 
Last edited:

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom