Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Is it true that Togadia is a Jain and not a Hindu?
BTW I'm totally opposed to such speech. Violence against my own people is a not a matter to be spoken of lightly and in this threatening manner.
Pls think clearly - VIOLENCE AGAINST MY OWN PEOPLE!
I hope he's sent to jail.
He is a fundamentalist alright. But not a moron. A cunning fundamentalist.
No wonder he has been banished from Gujarat.
New Recruit
Allow me to play the devil's advocate here :
He did not
-Insult Islam/Mohammed/Allah
-He did not abuse any one by name
-He did directly not exhort 100cr Hindus to kill any one.
He did
-use past sad incidents to say what would happen if Police is taken away.
-give an indirect threat of riots
His speech was repulsive, but is this going to stand in a court of law on account of hate speech ? I dont think so.
He was a very cunning man. I think he legally vetted his speech before actually delivering that.
Anyway a case has been filed against him, let law take its own course.
()(), Bad boy, you only quoted a part of the Firstpost article.
But hear the speech carefully and you realise that Togadia has been clever while Owaisi was plain stupid. He uses unparliamentary language for Owaisi but without taking his name. As far as the references to the riots are concerned, Togadia will take recourse to the excuse that he was merely quoting facts while Owaisi was issuing a threat. In his speech, Togadia issues a veiled threat couching it in praise of the sword-wielding Goddess Durga. Owaisi in contrast spoke of Hindu Gods and Goddesses in an offensive manner.
If we must get into hair-splitting, the other crucial difference is that Togadia is relatively a nobody while Owaisi is the leader of the All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen (AIMIM) in the Andhra Pradesh Assembly. He is an elected representative and he is under oath to promote religious amity
This is what I said. His speech can be considered unwarranted, but legally its *not* going to stand scrutiny.
You forgot vsdoc - hindu-by-proxy bigot.
Togadia has a history of hate speech and insult to other religions. Please go Youtube and you will find a lot. Spare sometime from your daily routine laws and legal procedures.
IPC is not just about word
We all know what Togadia speaks . It's all over the youtube. Nothing to establish about it except the amount of sentence he deserve.
Question is why he isn't behind the bars not how many sentences of hate speech
New Recruit
And ()() in case you forgot, I dont like this Togadiya guy because he ran a sabotage campaign against Modi in Gujarat. His arrest or not is immaterial to me. I'm just telling you the plain facts on ground.
Just assuming he gave a hate speech (repulsive speech, yes) and then asking him to be arrested just because your youth icon Owaisi was also arrested reeks of ignorance. Cases are decided on individual culpability..not in a competitive manner. Just because an Owais, who was stupid enough to openly abuse people by names, abuse the Gods and Godesses of the majority religion in land, was arrested does not mean another guy who was more sly and cunning in his speech will also be arrested.
There are plenty of Muslims also who have evaded and continue to evade the long arm of law like Imam Bukhari.
I don't care about Owaisi or Bukhari. Youth icon lol. My icon is in Gujarat.
I'll post the video (Togadia ) and sections of IPC ( and case history) soon as I get time.
New Recruit
Dont bother he is booked under 295 and 153.
And why you dont care ? Werent you asking why is togadiya not arrested when owaisi is arrested ? The actual comparison is with imam bukhari as both togadiya and bukhari are not elected representatives of people and are just part time religious leaders or so they claim).
your icon in Gujarat ? who arjun modhwadia or shakti sinh gohil or shanker sinh vagehla or Keshu bappa ?