What's new

Saeed ajmal not included in ICC awards nominations

Super Falcon

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Jul 3, 2008
Messages
15,816
Reaction score
-8
Country
Pakistan
Location
United Arab Emirates
man is ICC blind or what or they just see only 11 indian players zaheer khan etc man no one picks ajmal not even sachin with 4 wickets in today match big question mark on ICC Nominations listen to aussie players ICC that they dont know what is coming out of ajmal hands they dont have any idea and still not been nominated ICC sucks
 
.
yea ajmal should have been nominated..he has taken 122 wickets in just 23 tests which is the most by any international player and he is currently at no 3 spot in both one day and test rankings of the players
 
. .
Pakistan likely to boycott ICC awards

KARACHI: The Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) said on Thursday it was considering boycotting the International Cricket Council (ICC) annual awards over the omission of spinner Saeed Ajmal from the shortlist for Test player of the year and a final decision is expected within the next few days.


An independent jury comprising former players, officials and mediamen provoked anger in Pakistan after omitting the wily off-spinner from the shortlist of four candidates, which includes Sri Lanka’s Kumar Sangakkara, Australian Michael Clarke and South Africans Vernon Philander and Hashim Amla.

Ajmal, 34, took 72 wickets in 12 Tests from August 2011 to July this year, including 24 wickets in a 3-0 rout of then world number one team England in January-February.

The Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) earlier this week lodged a protest with the ICC demanding a review of the shortlist for the September 15 ceremony to be held in Colombo, Sri Lanka. But the ICC said an independent jury had decided the list.

“The way the ICC has ignored Ajmal is unjust and the PCB must convey its reservations by boycotting the awards ceremony in Sri Lanka,” former Pakistan captain Rashid Latif told AFP.

“Ajmal deserved to be in the shortlist and his omission is unjust.”

Former batsman Basit Ali urged the PCB not to accept the decision.

“The decision to leave out Ajmal is inexplicable and Pakistan must not attend the ceremony,” he said.

Mohsin Khan, the former opener who coached the team that beat England this year, said the selection process should not come down to personal preferences.

“This ICC process to shortlist players is clearly flawed because cricket is all about performance, not personal likes and dislikes. Better if the PCB boycotts the awards function,” Khan said.

“It will at least send out a strong message to the ICC. South Africa also did it in 2009 when their deserving players were ignored for the awards.”


http://dawn.com/2012/09/06/pakistan-likely-to-boycott-icc-awards/
 
.
well i dont think so they are independent one player takes wickets most than any bowler in all forms of games and yet he is not nominated it is itself biggest slap to independent jury all of them and to ICC award means that who ever played better than any one than ajmal figures speaks itself and other players like philander were included with lesser wickets in the year than ajmal but he took more 5 hauls but it doeas not make him better than ajmal took 72 and philander 56 so who rules
 
.
Imran Khan stunned by Ajmal's omission from ICC awards

Cricketing legend Imran Khan led a protest of former Pakistan captains over off-spinner Saeed Ajmal’s omission from a list of annual awards, terming it a great injustice.
The spinner was not included in a shortlist of four players for the best test player of the year category in the International Cricket Council (ICC) annual awards to be held in Colombo on September 15.

Imran Khan stunned by Ajmal’s omission from ICC awards – The Express Tribune
 
.
Not surprising since ICC (international clown council) is run by indians now. Naturally other than saffron colored lunny toones, no one else will get nominated.


oh so plz tell me how many indians got nominated this year??

dont know about ICC but religious bigots like u definitely are clowns!
 
.
PCB should not attend the ICC awards ceremony.
This is not question of our liking or dislike, Performance speaks well.
Just look the past two year of the performance, Performance chart contradicts ICC decision about ajmal for even not considering list of best player.
 
.
Dhoni got nominated with ZERO centuries in this year

Dhoni's avg this year is also bloated, he came during the end of 50% of the matches he played and just happened to not get out. Avgs are counted after outs.

In the other 50% he could get a highest of 87.

Kohli's nomination looks okay with 8 centuries and 6 50s and an Avg of 66.

Malinga's nomination as the leading ODI wicket taker seems okay too - but in Tests it was Ajmal who was the leading wicket taker!

So yeah when there's one way of choosing for all other categories why was Ajmal skipped over in the test category?
 
.
Dhoni got nominated with ZERO centuries in this year

Dhoni's avg this year is also bloated, he came during the end of 50% of the matches he played and just happened to not get out. Avgs are counted after outs.

In the other 50% he could get a highest of 87.

Kohli's nomination looks okay with 8 centuries and 6 50s and an Avg of 66.

Malinga's nomination as the leading ODI wicket taker seems okay too - but in Tests it was Ajmal who was the leading wicket taker!

So yeah when there's one way of choosing for all other categories why was Ajmal skipped over in the test category?


Kohli has the record for scoring most runs in a run of 12 ODIs ever. Dhoni as you mentioned has a high average and is the best fnisher in world cricket, he simply comes and finishes opponents off, a quality that only perhaps Bevan had in entire cricket history. Malinga is one of the most destructive ODI bowlers (except incidentally against India where he has gotten his fair share of whipping by Dhoni and Kohli).

I don't follow Pak cricket so can't comment on Ajmal, but the other nominations are exceptional players.
 
.
as usual biasedness came into play which is something ICC is best at
 
.
Dhoni got nominated with ZERO centuries in this year

Dhoni's avg this year is also bloated, he came during the end of 50% of the matches he played and just happened to not get out. Avgs are counted after outs.

In the other 50% he could get a highest of 87.

Kohli's nomination looks okay with 8 centuries and 6 50s and an Avg of 66.

Malinga's nomination as the leading ODI wicket taker seems okay too - but in Tests it was Ajmal who was the leading wicket taker!

So yeah when there's one way of choosing for all other categories why was Ajmal skipped over in the test category?


To u every Indian cricketer does not deserve... Does not matter if Dhoni comes last or first.. he is probably the best finisher in cricket rite now...he does not make 10's and 20's.. but 50+ most of the times...and that too very fast..

u must be kidding me when u say Kohli's nomination looks okay...ur statement shows nothing but sheer jealousy..remember how Kohli whooped Pakistanis in asia cup..he has one of the best years of his career..something any upcoming cricketer will only dream about..

There are better ways of proving ajmal's worth rather than saying nonsense stuff about other cricketers..
 
.
Ajmal is good bowler But he not a idiol cricketer.... Specially the way he talks. Sorry about this but He talks similar like a street mafia.... The way he insulted sachin tendulkar says it all.... i mean ajmal himself is an 'Uncle'.... He old guy but same time insulted an icon of Cricket.... A legend sachin tendulkar (specially when he got beaten just a day before by india and was useless against indian batting attack in that match).... Ajmal is an insult to pakistans cricket image (due to the way he behaves). He seriously need to Learn how to talk and behave. The reason He wasnt got included in ICC award was that ICC gave him permission to throw the ball and he said openly he got permission by ICC.... The reason ICC gave him permission to throw was most pakistani cricketers were banned from cricket due to fixing and ICC wanted to keep pakistan cricket alive.... Ajmal taking advantage of it and saying it openly. Ajmal needs to learn how to talk. He lacks manners and this is spoiling pakistans image world wide.... Ajmal not a youngster. He himself old.... If he dont learn now than when will he?.... Shreeshanth of india had similar problem. BCCI thrown him out.... Same with Harbhajan and BCCI thrown him out too.... When will PCB do same? PCB gave ajmal full freedom to talk nonsence.... He can be great bowler but he spoiling his and countries image by his nonstop nonsence talks....
 
.
Ajmal is good bowler But he not a idiol cricketer.... Specially the way he talks. Sorry about this but He talks similar like a street mafia.... The way he insulted sachin tendulkar says it all.... i mean ajmal himself is an 'Uncle'.... He old guy but same time insulted an icon of Cricket.... A legend sachin tendulkar (specially when he got beaten just a day before by india and was useless against indian batting attack in that match).... Ajmal is an insult to pakistans cricket image (due to the way he behaves). He seriously need to Learn how to talk and behave. The reason He wasnt got included in ICC award was that ICC gave him permission to throw the ball and he said openly he got permission by ICC.... The reason ICC gave him permission to throw was most pakistani cricketers were banned from cricket due to fixing and ICC wanted to keep pakistan cricket alive.... Ajmal taking advantage of it and saying it openly. Ajmal needs to learn how to talk. He lacks manners and this is spoiling pakistans image world wide.... Ajmal not a youngster. He himself old.... If he dont learn now than when will he?.... Shreeshanth of india had similar problem. BCCI thrown him out.... Same with Harbhajan and BCCI thrown him out too.... When will PCB do same? PCB gave ajmal full freedom to talk nonsence.... He can be great bowler but he spoiling his and countries image by his nonstop nonsence talks....

They need to know that cricket is gentlemans game..
 
.
149604.2.jpg

lol
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom