What's new

S arabia vs. iran military expenditure

timmy_area51

BANNED
Joined
Feb 2, 2018
Messages
1,217
Reaction score
-3
Country
Iran, Islamic Republic Of
Location
Kazakhstan
c449eb7e340442a9ad3cfe048e8f0769_6.jpg
 
.
96eda3aa5a6b43dcb121f50b32e073d1_6.jpg


looks like if s arabia decides to go to war with iran it will be islam 2.0
 
. . .
And the winner is Israel...
Totally agreed, the enemy wants Muslims to fight with each other and the stupid Muslims fight....

israel only wants a share of the saudi pie , iran is only an excuse
Both Iran and KSA will be become too weak. However KSA has an advantage that it holds the key holy sites so the Islamic world will support it against any aggression from Israel or any other non-Muslim country but Iran does not have any such position so it is better for both the countries to behave and solve their issues through dialogue and overcome their hate. Both are playing in the hands of satan.
 
.
Iran is called land of Aryans. They are a very proud people. I think if Saudi Arabians invade Iran and try to annex Iran then Iranians would fight to the death and it would be very bloody for both sides but I don't think Saudi Arabia can annex Iran when Iraq was not able to in the 1980s.
 
. .
Iran 1000+ years state tradition, Saudi Arabia less then 100 years, Iran is here to stay, Saudi will be done for after oil and will return to bearding camels.

Iran, Turkey, Egypt are historic and natural competitors for the region, power bases. Saudis are temporary, like the crusaders they came and were gone, so will the Saudis.
 
. .
.
Iran 1000+ years state tradition, Saudi Arabia less then 100 years, Iran is here to stay, Saudi will be done for after oil and will return to bearding camels.

Iran, Turkey, Egypt are historic and natural competitors for the region, power bases. Saudis are temporary, like the crusaders they came and were gone, so will the Saudis.
Hatred makes people loose the sense of reality!

maxresdefault.jpg


Saudi Arabia discovers 9,000 year-old civilization

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-saudi-archaeology-idUSTRE77N5TL20110824https://www.reuters.com/article/us-saudi-archaeology-idUSTRE77N5TL20110824
 
Last edited:
.
Last edited:
.
So? Arabic language didn't even exist back then. Egypt back in the day wasn't Arab either. Neither was Tunisia. Neither was Iraq. Neither was Syria. Back then Arabs were only in a small part of what is now Yemen.
I have seen that most of your posts aim for a tree but miss the whole forest my friend.. Arabic was called Aramaic then.. And according to your theory where the Arabs came from? or who was there 9000 years ago, please don't tell us your ancestors were..

Anyway, back on topic"
There is no comparison in the two military budgets of Saudi Arabia and Iran..
 
Last edited:
.
Arabic was called Aramaic then

Nope. Totally different. Arabic is not even Canaanite which originated in western part of middle east. Aramaic and Hebrew and Phoenician and Akkadian are all Canaanite. Arabic originated in eastern part of middle east, not closely related to these languages. Aramaic is still spoken by some Christians in Syria.


 
.
Nope. Totally different. Arabic is not even Canaanite which originated in western part of middle east. Aramaic and Hebrew and Phoenician and Akkadian are all Canaanite. Arabic originated in eastern part of middle east, not closely related to these languages. Aramaic is still spoken by some Christians in Syria.


Arabic is a branch of Aramaic.. you better google it to know a bit more, before posting..
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom