Russia’s Surging Electronic Warfare Capabilities

[jhungary]

are you trying to say the U.S is more mobile with it's EW?? like for instance you say FULL GLOBAL COVERAGE, you are saying the U.S can get it's assests where it's needed?

but these systems Russia is developing are very mobile.


let's look at the system I am just saying are better than what the U.S has or doesn't have

Khibiny http://www.deagel.com/Aircraft-Protection-Systems/Khibiny_a002981001.aspx the U.S analog would be the ALQ-99 right?? what I am saying is this system is light years better than what we are using.

next

Moskva-1 http://kret.com/en/news/3876/


do we even have anything like that in the West?

next

Krasukha-4 http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/russia-using-electronic-warfare-cloak-its-actions-syria-isis-nato-1523328



only system I think of that remotely comes close to this is KORAL

http://www.janes.com/article/58326/turkey-receives-first-koral-land-based-ew-system

next

Rtut-M



does anyone else have a system that explodes proximity fused artillery and rockets??

and lastly

President-S



we don't have any system like this protecting our helicopters

here is the result of President-S

It's not mobile, the US system are more comprehensive. Mobile means they lack of a full spectrum solution to focus on a general direction (Dealt with all 4 EW Discipline), that is why Russia need a mobile platform to perform these stuff. As they are lacking of a General Attack capability.

You are talking about a "Blow-by-Blow" comparison between US and Russian technology, I am talking about the application and strategic value of such a system.

Let's use what you said as an example.

Khibiny http://www.deagel.com/Aircraft-Protection-Systems/Khibiny_a002981001.aspx the U.S analog would be the ALQ-99 right?? what I am saying is this system is light years better than what we are using.

Source: https://defence.pk/threads/russia%E2%80%99s-surging-electronic-warfare-capabilities.427507/#ixzz46MeT4E4K

Khibiny and ALQ-99 is two different system, Khibiny is a ECM device with electronic jamming capability. ALQ-99 (and ALQ-218) were a direct attack device.

The difference? Khibiny work more like stealth, but instead of avoiding enemy radar detection, they confused the radar of their target, much like a jammer. However, Khibiny lacking of Communication Jamming, as well as datalink, they cannot use to actively jam an enemy radar. For which ALQ-99 and ALQ-218 can. Khibiny on SU-34 is more like a ALQ-99/ALQ-218 on EA-6B, while they did jam, they don't have enough power to actively block all the frequency and can operate around their own jamming.

Moskva-1 http://kret.com/en/news/3876/
https://defence.pk/threads/russia%E2%80%99s-surging-electronic-warfare-capabilities.427507/#ixzz46MflcJBo

This is fault actually, passive radar does not mean they will not emit anything, Passive Radar means they are using a third party receiver to broadcast and receive incoming target information.

And yes, US do have PCL tech Lockheed have been developing PCL since 1998. And many other (Such as BAe or Thales) have their own version of PCL

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Passive_radar#Commercial_.26_Academic_Systems

Krasukha-4 http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/russia-using-electronic-warfare-cloak-its-actions-syria-isis-nato-1523328

EA-18G/EC-130H perform the same task. Just not land base (And again, Airborne means they are more comprehensive)

Rtut-M
https://defence.pk/threads/russia%E2%80%99s-surging-electronic-warfare-capabilities.427507/#ixzz46Mij08G3

This sounded like what an IED jammer can do

http://www.militaryaerospace.com/articles/2015/03/ied-jammers-sierra.html

President-S
https://defence.pk/threads/russia%E2%80%99s-surging-electronic-warfare-capabilities.427507/#ixzz46Miz1z00

you mean this??

http://www.baesystems.com/en-us/product/anale55-fiberoptic-towed-decoy

and this?

http://www.baesystems.com/en-us/product/anaar57-common-missile-warning-system-cmws[/quote]