indoPunjabi
FULL MEMBER
![](/styles/default/xenforo/ranks/Lieutenant.jpg)
- Joined
- Jun 16, 2013
- Messages
- 799
- Reaction score
- -3
- Country
- Location
Typical. Only a Yindoo will find this a time to be joking.
There are no casualties! I can laugh at Russians for trusting made in China rocket :p
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Typical. Only a Yindoo will find this a time to be joking.
^^^^
And a Mullah will keep licking Chinese a**......no matter what......
Neither do we and I will concede to that. Assume the generosity for now, we do not know that if the components the Russians claimed are sub-standard, according to Russian standards, if they are designed and manufactured specifically for space flight or just supposed to be hardened for harsh environments, such as arctic or dessert or high humidity and so on. We do not know that the Russians may be incompetent in integrating foreign manufactured components into their rockets, although a possibility, I call this a remote probability.At least, China-made rockets have a much better success rate.
As for its claim that some parts are made in China, I do not know. However, the reality is that we have more russian rockets exploded. Our China-made rockets seem to perform quite well.
Reminds me of what the Chinese students used to say in response to complaints about the quality of certain Chinese products, like mis-marked under-strength fasteners: "Ha-ha, you should have spent more money to buy better quality from elsewhere."It is not beyond belief that IF China know that certain components are narrowly designed and manufactured for highly specific applications destined for Russia, quality assurance can be different (lower) from components destined for Chinese applications.
Neither do we and I will concede to that. Assume the generosity for now, we do not know that if the components the Russians claimed are sub-standard, according to Russian standards, if they are designed and manufactured specifically for space flight or just supposed to be hardened for harsh environments, such as arctic or dessert or high humidity and so on. We do not know that the Russians may be incompetent in integrating foreign manufactured components into their rockets, although a possibility, I call this a remote probability.
However, coming from an R/D and manufacturing background, I do know for a fact that products destined for different clients, different client quality levels, or different countries of destination, can have different batch/lot IDs, part IDs, or even individual serial IDs. It is not beyond belief that IF China know that certain components are narrowly designed and manufactured for highly specific applications destined for Russia, quality assurance can be different (lower) from components destined for Chinese applications. If the Russians because of many factors have no choice but to rely on China for these components, there is nothing they can do other than to suffer the consequences of the vagaries of fortune.
I used to work for Micron Technology, one of the world's few remaining memory manufacturers, on back end Burn-In testing.Reminds me of what the Chinese students used to say in response to complaints about the quality of certain Chinese products, like mis-marked under-strength fasteners: "Ha-ha, you should have spent more money to buy better quality from elsewhere."
We baked everything and under heat stress, we perform random read/write operations into the cells, then does full ops on every module afterwards. The best modules are reserved for what we call 'Tier 1' customers, and that includes sub-contractors for the military, which includes NASA and other assorted alphabetical agencies, although we would not know who paid for what. Lesser modules are reserved for lower tier-ed customers and who knows what they do with what they purchased. My job back then was to make sure the part lines do not mix.This item was taken from the IEEE Periodical ' Real impact of dynamic operation stress during burn-in on DRAM retention time ' The burn-in (BI) mechanism in connection with the dynamic operation stress (DOS) has been investigated to examine the real impact on dynamic random access memory (DRAM) reliablity.
You might want to reconsider that comment...
Russia's 'made-in-China' Proton-M explodes during launch - English pravda.ru
![]()
There are no casualties! I can laugh at Russians for trusting made in China rocket :p
Quality of Russian-made rocket with Chinese equipments is really questionable.![]()
Probably because China uses US-made electronics.yeah,maybe,but we have a 100 successful launch record continuously,how about ur great Indian?Before u laught at us , got a record of 50 successfully continuously launch at first.
The problem is, there is not much alternative, if the Russians can't do it then it is bad news....'cause apart from Russia there is only America, who is very fussy about sharing its technology...
One can do that with electronics; it's not feasible to to that with every nut and bolt.I used to work for Micron Technology...We baked everything and under heat stress, we perform random read/write operations into the cells, then does full ops on every module afterwards...