What's new

Russia warns Japan over travel to disputed islands

Hafizzz

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
5,041
Reaction score
0
Russia warns Japan over travel to disputed islands | Reuters

(Reuters) - Russia threatened on Thursday to ban visa-free travel for Japanese officials to four disputed Pacific islands if they make statements demanding the territories be returned to Japan.

The renewed tension could set back a fresh drive by the countries' leaders to end a decades-old territorial dispute over the small islands north of Hokkaido which were seized by Soviet troops at the end of World War Two.

The spat over the islands, known as the Southern Kuriles in Russia and as the Northern Territories in Japan, has prevented Moscow and Tokyo signing a treaty formally ending hostilities and still hinders efforts to improve relations.

"If for some reason Japanese politicians cannot refrain from making public statements on the subject of the islands after a visit to Russian territory, we reserve the right to limit their participation in such trips," the Russian Foreign Ministry said.

It underlined in a written statement that visa-free travel was permitted for Japanese officials as a "humanitarian act", mainly to enable them to visit the graves of their ancestors.

The ministry made clear it was referring to comments by Ichita Yamamoto, Japan's Minister of State for Okinawa and Northern Territories Affairs, during a visit to the islands and quoted him as saying that his view of "the need to return territories" was reinforced by his trip.

PUTIN AND TALKS

Tokyo did not immediately respond. Asked about the Russian Foreign Ministry's warning at a news conference, Japanese Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshihide Suga said he was not aware of it and declined further comment.

A report by the Nikkei business daily on a news conference given by the minister on September 23 following his visit appeared to contain no inflammatory comments.

"We intend to calmly accept the current condition surrounding the Northern Territories and solve the territorial issue through tenacious negotiations, without fluctuating between hope and despair," Nikkei quoted him as saying.

Russian President Vladimir Putin and Japan's then prime minister, Shinzo Abe, agreed to revive talks on the islands during a summit in Moscow in April. Any new tensions over the islands would be likely to set back those efforts.

An end to the dispute is not in sight, but reviving long-stalled talks is a first step to improving economic cooperation, which both sides say has failed to live up to its potential.

The islands were seized by the Soviet Union, of which Russia was then the biggest part, after it declared war on Japan in August 1945 and days before Japan surrendered, forcing about 17,000 Japanese to flee. They are near rich fishing grounds.

Japan and Russia are still nominally at war, although hostilities ended shortly after Japan surrendered. The conclusion of a peace treaty depends on the resolution of the territorial dispute.
 
Japan is not great power anymore,it was until 1945,Japan have money(alot) but dont have a permission to spend money on building real power(military,political...)except some civil society things(fast tracks,sports,technology....)

So Japan dont have power to challenge other Asian countries.
 
Why do they need these islands? They even have Hokkaido problem - for the Japanese it's North and cold and no one wants to live there.
 
Russian warmongering again.I foresee that in the next 15-20 years many russians will again take a dive at the bottom of the sea to join their forefathers.Russians love to sleep with the fishes.

Battle of Tsushima - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

If a naval fight were to happen, then a soviet defeat could be on the cards. Russia has been a power on the seas since the Soviet days. However unlike America, the Russians don't have the money to upgrade and buy new ships on the scale of the Americans.

I have seen the Russian inventory, very soviet like. Their ships are really old. Their carrier is no better than the Chinese carrier. The destroyer that was sent to Syrian coast is a joke. I can't believe it still exist.
 
Russian warmongering again.I foresee that in the next 15-20 years many russians will again take a dive at the bottom of the sea to join their forefathers.Russians love to sleep with the fishes.

Battle of Tsushima - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You got to be kidding me. A few cruise missile strikes by russian nuclear subs on japanese ports,industrial facilities and bases and Japan will be done for. Have you seen what fukushima did to japan .Now imagine a conventional iskander missile attack or cruise missile attack on japanese nuclear facilities or a Tu-22m3 attacks on Japanese naval assets.

If a naval fight were to happen, then a soviet defeat could be on the cards. Russia has been a power on the seas since the Soviet days. However unlike America, the Russians don't have the money to upgrade and buy new ships on the scale of the Americans.

I have seen the Russian inventory, very soviet like. Their ships are really old. Their carrier is no better than the Chinese carrier. The destroyer that was sent to Syrian coast is a joke. I can't believe it still exist.

Yeah sure. Call me when China can field nuclear submarines like the ones russians have .Till then STFU.
 
If a naval fight were to happen, then a soviet defeat could be on the cards. Russia has been a power on the seas since the Soviet days. However unlike America, the Russians don't have the money to upgrade and buy new ships on the scale of the Americans.

I have seen the Russian inventory, very soviet like. Their ships are really old. Their carrier is no better than the Chinese carrier. The destroyer that was sent to Syrian coast is a joke. I can't believe it still exist.

On soviet navy:

US aircraft carriers would last 2-3 days against Soviet navy at sea. - YouTube


Get your facts right.
 
Back
Top Bottom