What's new

Russia-Ukraine War - News and Developments

Status
Not open for further replies.

RUSSIAN OFFENSIVE CAMPAIGN ASSESSMENT, MAY 20​

May 20, 2022 - Press ISW
ISW%20LOGO%20FINAL%20ACRONYM%20%20%20NAME_ISW%20LOGO%20FINAL%20ACRONYM%20NAME%20CMYK_422.png

Download the PDF

Karolina Hird, Frederick W. Kagan, and George Barros
May 20, 5:30 ET
Russian forces are focusing on digging in and reinforcing defensive positions in Kharkiv and along the Southern Axis in preparation for Ukrainian counteroffensives, while the majority of active offensive operations remain confined to Izyum-Donetsk City arc and especially the Popasna-Severodonetsk area.
The Ukrainian General Staff reported that Russian forces are creating secondary defensive lines on the Southern Axis, indicating that the Russian grouping in this area may be preparing for a major Ukrainian counter-offensive and a protracted conflict. Russian forces reportedly are holding defensive positions north of Kharkiv City following the success of the Ukrainian counteroffensive since May 5 and have conducted limited spoiling attacks either to give Russian forces time to complete their redeployment back to Russia in good order or to allow reinforcements to arrive to defend territory in Kharkiv Oblast. Significant Russian offensive operations are confined to the area of Severodonetsk. Russian troops have made marginal gains to the north, west, and south of the city, especially around Popasna, in order to attempt to take control of Severodonetsk.
Key Takeaways

  • Russian forces may have made marginal gains to the north, west, and south of Popasna in order to continue their offensive on Severodonetsk from the south.
  • Russian sources may be overstating the number of Ukrainian defenders who have been evacuated from Azovstal to either maximize the number of Russian prisoners of war who may be exchanged for Ukrainian soldiers or to avoid the embarrassment of admitting they have been locked into a months-long siege against only “hundreds” of Ukrainian soldiers.
  • Russian troops reportedly regained certain positions taken by the Ukrainian counteroffensive north of Kharkiv City.
  • Russian forces are likely preparing for a major Ukrainian counteroffensive and protracted conflict on the Southern Axis.
Assessed Control of Terrain in Ukraine

We do not report in detail on Russian war crimes because those activities are well-covered in Western media and do not directly affect the military operations we are assessing and forecasting. We will continue to evaluate and report on the effects of these criminal activities on the Ukrainian military and population and specifically on combat in Ukrainian urban areas. We utterly condemn these Russian violations of the laws of armed conflict, Geneva Conventions, and humanity even though we do not describe them in these reports.
ISW has updated its assessment of the four primary efforts Russian forces are engaged in at this time. We have stopped coverage of supporting effort 4, ”Sumy and northeastern Ukraine,” because it is no longer an active effort.:


    • Main effort—Eastern Ukraine (comprised of one subordinate and three supporting efforts);
    • Subordinate main effort- Encirclement of Ukrainian troops in the cauldron between Izyum and Donetsk and Luhansk Oblasts
    • Supporting effort 1—Mariupol;
    • Supporting effort 2—Kharkiv City;
    • Supporting effort 3—Southern axis.
Main Effort—Eastern Ukraine
Subordinate Main Effort—Southern Kharkiv, Donetsk, Luhansk Oblasts (Russian objective: Encircle Ukrainian forces in Eastern Ukraine and capture the entirety of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts, the claimed territory of Russia’s proxies in Donbas)

Russian forces conducted unspecified offensive operations in the direction of Slovyansk but did not make any confirmed advances on May 20.[ii] The Ukrainian General Staff reported that Russian troops are attempting to erect a pontoon bridge over the Severskyi Donets River in the vicinity of Yaremivka, about 25 kilometers southeast of Izyum in the direction of Slovyansk.[iii] Russian forces additionally conducted artillery strikes on Dovhenke and Dolyna, both southeast of Izyum heading towards Slovyansk.[iv]
Russian forces reportedly intensified efforts to break through Ukrainian defenses around Popasna in order to push towards Severodonetsk from the south on May 20. Pro-Russian news sources reported that Russian forces made advances through Ukrainian lines of defense in three directions. Russian Airborne (VDV) forces reportedly took control of Volodymirivka and Lypove, and broke through Ukrainian defenses in Komyshuvakha, all north of Popasna.[v] Troops of the Russian ”Wagner” Private Military Company reportedly took control of Trypillya and Vyskrivka to the west of Popasna.[vi] Ukrainian sources noted that offensive operations are on-going in Vyskrivka.[vii] Russian forces additionally reportedly took control of Troitske, south of Popasna.[viii] Such reports are consistent with Ukrainian General Staff statements that the Russian grouping around Popasna is trying to take new frontiers in the area.[ix] NASA’s Fire Information for Resource Management (FIRMS) data, however, does not show a concentration of fires in this area, which may suggest that the Russian sources are exaggerating the scale or significance of the attacks, although the absence of evidence is not evidence of absence in this case.[x] The purported encirclement of the Popasna area may be an effort to break through Ukrainian defenses in order to provide support for the on-going battle for Severodonetsk, where Russian troops are making marginal gains and reportedly took control of Shchedryshcheve and Syrotne, just north of Severodonetsk.[xi]
Russian forces reportedly made marginal gains during ground attacks in Donetsk Oblast on May 20. Pro-Russian Telegram channels stated that Russian forces are trying to encircle a Ukrainian grouping around Svyatohirsk and are storming Yarova, both west of Lyman and within 10 kilometers of the border with Kharkiv Oblast.[xii] The Ukrainian General Staff reported that Russian forces are continuing offensive operations around Lyman and will likely continue to push west to meet Russian forces in Southern Kharkiv Oblast.[xiii] Russian forces are additionally conducting unsuccessful assault operations around Donetsk City in the vicinity of Avdiivka and Novobakhmutivka.[xiv]

Control of Terrain Around Luhansk

Supporting Effort #1—Mariupol (Russian objective: Capture Mariupol and reduce the Ukrainian defenders)
Russian sources may be overstating the number of Ukrainian defenders who have been evacuated from the Azovstal Steel Plant as of May 20. Russian Defense Minister Sergey Shoigu stated that nearly 2,000 Ukrainian fighters have left Azovstal since evacuations began, whereas the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) reported that it has registered only “hundreds” of Ukrainian prisoners of war.[xv] The discrepancy could result merely from delays in ICRC registrations or reporting. Official Russian sources may also be obfuscating the true number of evacuees for various reasons, however. The Russians might claim that they have captured more Ukrainian soldiers than they actually did in order to maximize the number of Russian prisoners that can be exchanged should they agree on a prisoner swap with Ukraine. The Russian leadership may also seek to avoid the embarrassment of admitting that their forces have been locked in a months-long siege by ”hundreds” rather than ”thousands” of Ukrainian defenders. Commander of the Azov Regiment Denis Prokopenko additionally stated that he has given the command to stop the defense of Mariupol to save the lives of the defenders of Azovstal, so evacuation numbers will likely rise in the coming days.[xvi]
The Ukrainian General Staff reports that Russian forces are continuing filtration measures in Mariupol.[xvii] Advisor to the Mayor of Mariupol Petro Andryushchenko additionally made a number of claims that ISW cannot independently verify. He asserted that Russian troops are planning to use filtration camps in Mariupol to forcibly mobilize men into the militia of the Donetsk People’s Republic (DNR).[xviii] He claimed that the Russian occupation administration in Mariupol is planning a census for men aged 18 to 50 to further force mobilization into the DNR.[xix] He also asserted that four schools in Mariupol are set to open by the end of May under ”Russian standards and Russian programs,” with a full implementation of Russian curricula reportedly slated for fall of 2022.[xx] Andryushchenko’s claims are consistent with overall trends of filtration and occupation processes in Mariupol that ISW has been able to verify through other sources, although these particular claims are unverified at this time.
Mariupol

Supporting Effort #2—Kharkiv City (Russian objective: Withdraw forces to the north and defend ground lines of communication (GLOCs) to Izyum)
Russian forces focused on regaining positions taken by Ukrainian forces during the counteroffensive north of Kharkiv City on May 20.[xxi] Russian forces are reportedly fighting in Vesele, Tsyrkuny, Zolochiv, and Ternova and may have recaptured Ternova and Rubizhne, although ISW cannot independently confirm these claims at this time.[xxii] Such efforts are likely spoiling attacks meant to disrupt the Ukrainian counteroffensive in northern Kharkiv Oblast with the intention of either buying Russian forces time to withdraw and redeploy to other axes of advance or to reinforce defensive positions to the north of Kharkiv City. Russian forces additionally continued to shell Kharkiv City and its environs, likely to further distract Ukrainian forces from cohering offensive actions towards the Russian border.[xxiii]
Mariupol

Supporting Effort #3—Southern Axis (Objective: Defend Kherson against Ukrainian counterattacks)

Russian forces focused on strengthening existing defensive lines and creating secondary defensive lines on the Southern Axis but did not make any confirmed advances on May 20.[xxiv] The Ukrainian General Staff reported that Russian troops are bringing engineering equipment to frontlines on the Southern Axis to construct a second line of defense, which likely indicates that Russian forces are preparing to defend against possible Ukrainian counter-offensives and settling in for protracted operations in Southern Ukraine.[xxv] Russian forces conducted rocket, missile, and artillery attacks against Kherson, Zaporizhia, Dnipropetrovsk, and Odesa Oblasts.[xxvi]
The Ukrainian General Staff reported that Russian special services are continuing to destabilize the situation in Transnistria through disseminating disinformation about the mining of social infrastructure and state institutions in Tiraspol, Bender, Dubossary, and Rybnytsia.[xxvii]
Kherson

Immediate items to watch


    • Russian forces will likely complete their withdrawal from the vicinity of Kharkiv City but attempt to hold a line west of Vovchansk to defend their GLOCs from Belgorod to Izyum. It is unclear if they will succeed.
    • The Russians will continue efforts to encircle Severodonetsk and Lysychansk at least from the south, possibly by focusing on cutting off the last highway connecting Severodonetsk-Lysychansk with the rest of Ukraine.
    • Russian forces are likely preparing for Ukrainian counteroffensives and settling in for protracted operations in Southern Ukraine.

This is nothing but a spamming on the site with that gibberish from ISW. But if you want to understand more about the people who is behind that site, here they are:

1653096925212.png



Judea had declared a war on Germany in 1933
Judea has declared a war on Russia in 2014


We're indeed seeing what Judea is cooking for Europe, West, and the rest of the world.

The entire West is a Judea plantation!
 
.
The US is expanding NATO “geographically” to reach the borders of Russia because it is simply planning to deprive the Russians of their ballistic capabilities from the fixed bases on the Russian land..

When the US missile shield is installed in Ukraine, Poland, Sweden and Finland, it can can easily hit any Russian missile in the 1st stage, which is the ascent stage of the ballistic missile, or at most at the beginning of the 2nd stage. The ballistic transition stage.. In these stages, the interception success rate exceeds 95% Estimated due to the weakness of the missile in terms of acceleration or ability to move away from the lower orbit of the Earth, as does a missile such as Satan I or the new Sarmat (Satan II), where it departs from the lower orbit of the Earth and heads to the poles of the Earth, from which it is inferred on the target and revolves around the pole of the Earth until it reaches directly above it...

This is a simplified explanation of the importance of the geographical expansion of NATO to the proximity to Russia..

On the other hand.. It is very clear that the Russian ballistic missiles constitute a great source of concern for the US and the EU, because of which all the past years were invested in forming and expanding the NATO alliance in order to neutralize this danger or at least reduce it.

It mean that despite its large bases in Europe and its proximity to the borders of Russia, the US still does not feel completely safe.. and for a good reason beyond its capabilities; The area of Russia is more than 17 million km. The Russians can simply rely on the bases in the city of Yekaterinburg, which is tens of thousands of kilometers from the European borders, or even the Ural region in central Russia.

Russia is not the size of France or Britain, because its area is very large, and it can launch the Topol or Sarmat missile at distances that are impossible for the American missile shield to intercept..

Then this question arises: why do some countries justify all of America's actions and its provocation to the Russians near their borders?..and when Russia intervenes to protect its national security, it is demonized..

The matter is similar to all the wars that the US carried out in Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Libya and many other lands, but it is different now because the Russians are not weak like those countries..

So as a neutral and rational person, I prefer that there will be a multipolar world on this planet as nature made the north and south pole to balance things out and insure polarity and thus equilibrium..
 
Last edited:
.
Russian Foreign Ministry: We will start a new phase of our military operations in Ukraine..



The ruble jumped as much as 9% against the euro, hitting its strongest level since June 2015. The ruble is by far the best performing currency in 2022..

1653101455632.png
 
Last edited:
.
Let me explain to you about realpolitik: China WILL screw Russia over just like Venezuela.
So how are we screwing them? Do they get killed or invaded? We are facilitating trade for them to get dollars, if they start using rmb, it would be smoother, its just business Jose, we don't owe anybody anything, we are risking our ties with the West for Russia because of geopolitical considerations. Without China, Russia would have collapsed overnight. They are even getting chips from us now.

The US is expanding NATO “geographically” to reach the borders of Russia because it is simply planning to deprive the Russians of their ballistic capabilities from the fixed bases on the Russian land..

When the US missile shield is installed in Ukraine, Poland, Sweden and Finland, it can can easily hit any Russian missile in the 1st stage, which is the ascent stage of the ballistic missile, or at most at the beginning of the 2nd stage. The ballistic transition stage.. In these stages, the interception success rate exceeds 95% Estimated due to the weakness of the missile in terms of acceleration or ability to move away from the lower orbit of the Earth, as does a missile such as Satan I or the new Sarmat (Satan II), where it departs from the lower orbit of the Earth and heads to the poles of the Earth, from which it is inferred on the target and revolves around the pole of the Earth until it reaches directly above it...

This is a simplified explanation of the importance of the geographical expansion of NATO to the proximity to Russia..

On the other hand.. It is very clear that the Russian ballistic missiles constitute a great source of concern for the US and the EU, because of which all the past years were invested in forming and expanding the NATO alliance in order to neutralize this danger or at least reduce it.

It mean that despite its large bases in Europe and its proximity to the borders of Russia, the US still does not feel completely safe.. and for a good reason beyond its capabilities; The area of Russia is more than 17 million km. The Russians can simply rely on the bases in the city of Yekaterinburg, which is tens of thousands of kilometers from the European borders, or even the Ural region in central Russia.

Russia is not the size of France or Britain, because its area is very large, and it can launch the Topol or Sarmat missile at distances that are impossible for the American missile shield to intercept..

Then this question arises: why do some countries justify all of America's actions and its provocation to the Russians near their borders?..and when Russia intervenes to protect its national security, it is demonized..

The matter is similar to all the wars that the US carried out in Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Libya and many other lands, but it is different now because the Russians are not weak like those countries..

So as a neutral and rational person, I prefer that there will be a multipolar world on this planet as nature made the north and south pole to balance things out and insure polarity and thus equilibrium..
Well said, how come all the hoohah when it's Ukraine but not Iraq, Afghanistan or Libya?
 
.
The article explicitly mentions white phosphorous, and explains how under given circumstances white phosphorous is an incendiary weapon, not a "smoke shell".

icrc-jpg.845699



Anyone can understand the above excerpt and its underscored segments.

I suggest you reread the sentence about generating smoke.
You seem to believe that smoke shells do not generate smoke. Otherwise this ”explanation” has a conflict with itself.

An explanation of a treaty that conflicts with the treaty has lesser stance than the treaty.
 
.
Most chinese people don't hate the west, CCP doesn't hate the west...Stop spreading hatred, which is truly disgusting.

That is true. China was perfectly happy to share prosperity with the rest of the world because it wants rich customers everywhere for its products.

This China v/s West propaganda is spread by the US administration and media because they are threatened by China's rise. They did the same to Japan last century when it seemed like Japan was getting too big for its boots.
 
. . . .
I suggest you reread the sentence about generating smoke.
You seem to believe that smoke shells do not generate smoke. Otherwise this ”explanation” has a conflict with itself.

An explanation of a treaty that conflicts with the treaty has lesser stance than the treaty.

The International Committee of the Red Cross rejects that contention. It is explicit about white phosphorous having to be considered a potential weapon according to the treaty.

Why, is explained in minute detail under the below link by the ICRC's competent official, using pristine rational argumentation:


When it comes to the exegesis of a treaty, to what the formulation of its provisions implies in practice, the words of a legal expert carry superior weight.

And this basically confirms the point about legal experts insisting that white phosphorous does fall under the restrictions applying to incendiary weapons the moment it is actually used as one, rather then as a mere smoke generating tool.
 
Last edited:
.
why would Russia need to "compensate" the loss of Europpean markets when European markets will never stop buying from Russia? This is a fake hypothetical you just slipped in here will never exist in reality.

Europe does stop. Oil embargo comes soon, gas is phased out
 
.
Putin seeks to increase the number of soldiers by raising the ages.
Previously the age was set between 18-40 years for Russians, 18-30 years for foreigners.
Now that limits are lifted as per Reuters and Duma parliament.
More elder soldiers will be sent to the front.


binh-si-nga-1189.jpg
Binh lính Nga diễu hành qua Quảng trường Đỏ ở Moscow tại lễ duyệt binh kỷ niệm 77 năm ngày chiến thắng phát xít Đức trong Thế chiến hai. Ảnh: Reuters
"Đối với việc sử dụng vũ khí chính xác cao, việc vận hành vũ khí và thiết bị quân sự bởi các chuyên gia có chuyên môn cao rất cần thiết. Kinh nghiệm cho thấy, các binh sĩ trở nên như vậy ở độ tuổi 40 – 45", trích giải thích trên trang web của Duma quốc gia.

Theo Reuters, Nga hiện chỉ cho phép các công dân từ 18 - 40 tuổi và người nước ngoài từ 18 - 30 tuổi đăng ký nhập ngũ lần đầu để phục vụ quân đội nước này.
 
. .
First they said the Ukrainians are giving stiff resistance because Russia is actually fighting NATO and not the Ukrainians. Now they claim the Ukrainians as former Russians are the one of the strongest and the best in the world because of Russian mentality.:woot:

C-658VsXoAo3ovC.jpg


@jhungary @F-22Raptor @Wood
Then I will say the wrong "Russian" is on the Russian side.

I don't know how this would somehow make things better for Russia...... Becuase it said Russian is more incompetent than the "Pretend" Russian. Think about it , if China copy say "F-22" and perform better than the original F-22, then US said this is because they copy their original F-22, how or where does it mean it is better for the US, it just mean the original F-22 is crap, and they messed up the original idea??
 
.
then why has this same US lost every war since you and i were born? just fact checkingbro.


It depends.

If by “wars” you mean protracted, asymmetrical counter-insurgency operations like Afghanistan, I don’t think the US (or any other conventional force) has a good enough track record of winning to say they don’t win anymore is a bit of long stretch

Salam qamar
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom