RescueRanger
PDF THINK TANK: CONSULTANT
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2008
- Messages
- 16,370
- Reaction score
- 244
- Country
- Location
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Because the whole West was arming Ukraine explicitly.. It might have ringed a bell with Russia to invade Ukraine..Lol why share a tweet from 19th Feb on the 25th of Feb?
They were arming Ukraine because intelligence was telling them the Russia was planning to invade since the 6th of February.Because the whole West was arming Ukraine explicitly.. It might have ringed a bell with Russia to invade Ukraine..
That is true ..but Russia didn't accept it.. hence the invasion.. and Ukraine is on its own ..They were arming Ukraine because intelligence was telling them the Russia was planning to invade since the 6th of February.
Russia has enough troops ready to take Kyiv, says former Ukraine defence chief
White House believes Moscow has amassed at least 70% of firepower needed for mid-February invasionwww.theguardian.com
No, that is not the premise for the invasion, the invasion is more to do with how cozy Ukraine was becoming with NATO, not the weapons supply.That is true ..but Russia didn't accept it.. hence the invasion.. and Ukraine is on its own ..
What NATO has to do is give Ukraine back the 1,700 nuclear warheads that it voluntarily gave up for them to guarantee her sovereignty.What Nato has to do is provide the Ukrainians with lethal weapons and equipment this has to be priority number 1 in the grand scheme of things.
The more the merrier.
Because the whole West was arming Ukraine explicitly.. It might have ringed a bell with Russia to invade Ukraine..
Nit happy muslThe Only Good NAZIS is a Dead one.
Those NAZIS wanabee would face Chechen Battle Hardened troops.
On the way to Mariupol at this moment to fight Azov Batallion stationed there
Russians are not stupid. The name Ukraine will remain. They will allow the infrastructure and industry to continue. They will monitor it ofcourse. Money is moneyYou've totally gone out of perspective wrt what i meant with stake and for whom... It was meant for turkey and potentially Pakistan's stake... Russia's invasion of Ukraine will leave both without a potential strategic partner... Do you think the Russians would withdraw without severely crippling Ukrainian defense infrastructure...
Here are some of the problems that would arise for Turkey.
> Loss of potential TFX engine partner
> Loss of T-929 engine partner
> Loss of IFV engine provider
All these deals were of billions and most importantly countries with the infrastructure and willingness to help in the defense sector of Pakistan and Turkey...
Pakistan suffers in the following way
> Lack of spare parts of 6td2
> Lack of newer engines for New Al-Khalids
> Loss of partner for Al-Khalid 2 engine
> Loss of 1400hp potential engine upgrade for Al-Khalid
> Failure to upgrade T-80UDs of Pak Army by Ukraine...
_________________________________________
So you tell me, What are those cheesy comments for ? And If he is pointing out the hypocrisy of the west .... Why are you snubbing him ? Remember, our relationship with Russia has just begun while that with Ukraine is older and time tested... The JF-17 engines we got from them is partly due to China's diplomacy and not just our own.. Thinking so would be overconfidence...
Clarification... This is not an Erdogan simp post (which it may seem to you).. this is totally looking at the long term goals and interests of Pakistan vis a vis Turkey... Hope you understand.