Russia to China: You Shouldn't Have Stolen Our Jet Fighter

[Yingluck]

India cant even copy a MBT Tank?

 

[Crystal-Clear]

You kidding me right? The west don't have to do shit. During vostok exercise the chinese only send a small contingent to the exercise while they send their submarine to spy on the russian navy.

still a desperate attemp by west to disturb the relationship but i think China and Russia are both mature enough to dodge such rubbish articles of cia backed media .

 

[Novice09]

India cant even copy a MBT Tank?

How did India comes in this discussion???

The level of your intellect is clearly visible from "MBT Tank"... MAIN BATTLE TANK Tank...

Quote me or not... I'm not going to embroiled in further trolling...

 

[HannibalBarca]

yawn . west desperately trying to disturb the relationship between China & Russia .

Maybe you forget who was the source of that article aka "Quotes" from... aka Sputnik news... aka Gov controlled media... aka Russia...

Russian media criticizing China military "copies" isn't new... neither strange...

 

[Crystal-Clear]

Maybe you forget who was the source of that article aka "Quotes" from... aka Sputnik news... aka Gov controlled media... aka Russia...

Russian media criticizing China military "copies" isn't new... neither strange...

still russia is selling them S-400 & Su-35

 

[HannibalBarca]

still russia is selling them S-400 & Su-35

Ofc you can criticise something and still be friend/Biz partners. Otherwise You and Me wouldn't exist today...
And as you know...CN don't have the right (mutual understanding) to sell those "copies"... That's also why RU keep selling, when he knows it will be copied one day or another...Since they don't have to think about " Competition" with their own techs...

 

[royalharris]

I respect Russian of this forum somewhat
They never waste their time to make some useless argument with no significance people

They are calm and rational

 

[Globenim]

[https://nationalinterest]


September 26, 2018 Topic: Security Blog Brand: The Buzz Tags: RussiaChinaMilitaryTechnologyWorldJ-15

And Beijing might be paying the price.

by Michael Peck

Michael Peck is a contributing writer for the National Interest. He can be found on Twitter and Facebook.

Accurate title should be:
U.S.A to ignorants and morons. More cheap propaganda.

1. This trash is not a news report but a worthless blog.

2. This trash 100% U.S.A. propaganda
Michael Peck → U.S.A propaganda
Chinese circles → South China Morning Post artcile → U.S.A. propaganda
Asia Times → U.S.A. + Hindu and Viet pet propaganda
Asia Times noted that Chinese media → South China Morning Post → U.S.A. propaganda
"said Kashin"→ said Vasily Kashin "according to the South China Morning Post" → U.S.A. propaganda
"says Russia" → Sputnik cites Vasily Kashin → South China Morning Post → U.S.A. propaganda
"says Russia" → Sputnik cites Task & Purpose → U.S.A. propaganda
"so many J-15s have crashed and burned" → news.com.au/Jamie Seidel → South China Morning Post → U.S.A. propaganda

This U.S.A propaganda article completely spins the remark that China allegedly spent more money and time than expected out of context into ridicolous nonsense preying on ignorance of readers and fabricates a message the article never contained. And the claims they spin were made by the South China Morning Post, one of the biggest producers of U.S.A propaganda in the world. The Sputnik article never said or even implied anything about "China should not have stolen" or that "China will have to pay for it" as headlines and title and first few lines suggest it.

This U.S.A propaganda article completely rips comments on the reliability for the "first planes" out of context. Kashin actually called the J-15 superior. The satement reduced itself on the "first planes" not "the J-15" which is long past its childhood troubles, and only according to what he heard. Guess who he heard that also from. Correct the South China Morning Post again.

 

[Beast]

Accurate title should be:
U.S.A to ignorants and morons. More cheap propaganda.

1. This trash is not a news report but a worthless blog.

2. This trash 100% U.S.A. propaganda
Michael Peck → U.S.A propaganda
Chinese circles → South China Morning Post artcile → U.S.A. propaganda
Asia Times → U.S.A. + Hindu and Viet pet propaganda
Asia Times noted that Chinese media → South China Morning Post → U.S.A. propaganda
"said Kashin"→ said Vasily Kashin "according to the South China Morning Post" → U.S.A. propaganda
"says Russia" → Sputnik cites Vasily Kashin → South China Morning Post → U.S.A. propaganda
"says Russia" → Sputnik cites Task & Purpose → U.S.A. propaganda
"so many J-15s have crashed and burned" → news.com.au/Jamie Seidel → South China Morning Post → U.S.A. propaganda

This U.S.A propaganda article completely spins the remark that China allegedly spent more money and time than expected out of context into ridicolous nonsense preying on ignorance of readers and fabricates a message the article never contained. And the claims they spin were made by the South China Morning Post, one of the biggest producers of U.S.A propaganda in the world. The Sputnik article never said or even implied anything about "China should not have stolen" or that "China will have to pay for it" as headlines and title and first few lines suggest it.

This U.S.A propaganda article completely rips comments on the reliability for the "first planes" out of context. Kashin actually called the J-15 superior. The satement reduced itself on the "first planes" not "the J-15" which is long past its childhood troubles, and only according to what he heard. Guess who he heard that also from. Correct the South China Morning Post again.

I will not be surprised. next time USA will put the blamed of earthquake, Typhoon or heavy flood around the globe ,cause by China. Chinese hater will not doubt trust this absurd 100% article cos they are eager to ease their jealously , racism of rising China.

 

[Daniel808]

You kidding me right? The west don't have to do shit. During vostok exercise the chinese only send a small contingent to the exercise while they send their submarine to spy on the russian navy.

a small contigent?

Yeah rite. 3,200 Fully Equipped troops and 900 tanks from China Rapid Reaction Forces Units is a small contigent

Do u want China to send 100,000 troops to Russian soil? what a little boy

The west always try to divide China and Russian Partnership, but it will fail.

the west can crying so much, to see China and Russia as one against them
@vostok @TaiShang @Cybernetics

 

[vostok]

a small contigent?
Yeah rite. 3,200 Fully Equipped troops and 900 tanks...

I am sure it is more tanks than any NATO country (besides USA) ever sent to joint militaty exercises.

 

[bolo]

I will not be surprised. next time USA will put the blamed of earthquake, Typhoon or heavy flood around the globe ,cause by China. Chinese hater will not doubt trust this absurd 100% article cos they are eager to ease their jealously , racism of rising China.

China just caused Indonesia tsunami

 

[zectech]

yawn . west desperately trying to disturb the relationship between China & Russia .

 

[Tauren Paladin]

American retarded propaganda

 

[ptldM3]

I remember it's the 2 Russia plane that crashed into the sea from carrier instead of Chinese one. So who version is lousy?

Which was the fault of the arrester cables and had nothing to do with the aircraft where as with the J-15 it was faulty fly-by wire systems. So who version is lousy?