Russia’s Growing Ties with Vietnam

[yue10]

I may surprise you, but under Stalin was a private business. Clothing, alcohol drinks, shoes, food - mostly was produced by private organizations.
Hitler was a bloodthirsty maniac, because he thought that the Germans should rule other nations.
Stalin at the end of 1952 introduced the gold standard. And three months later he suddenly died. The gold standard is operational. Just the economy will ceases to be speculative and work for the enrichment of oligarchs.

like I said Hitler was a hero that just wanted to achieve Großdeutschland not to rule other nations, it was unfortunate for your Slavs that he wanted to conquer the lands to the East, it was the same with the Soviet Union and CIS

is that why many say the USSR was never really a communist state but under state capitalism, the problem for gold standard is that it is limited so when the economy expands the supply restricts this expansion unless you dig up more or go steal from somewhere else, there is also problems with monetary policy and price volatity

 

[vostok]

like I said Hitler was a hero that just wanted to achieve Großdeutschland not to rule other nations, it was unfortunate for your Slavs that he wanted to conquer the lands to the East, it was the same with the Soviet Union and CIS

is that why many say the USSR was never really a communist state but under state capitalism, the problem for gold standard is that it is limited so when the economy expands the supply restricts this expansion unless you dig up more or go steal from somewhere else, there is also problems with monetary policy and price volatity

No state in the world never was a real communism. In USSR was socialism.
That's right. The amount of gold is limited - so the consumer goods become cheaper with the growth of production. So it was in the Soviet Union after the war - every year goods became cheaper by 3-10%. It was Under Stalin, but a fool Khrushchev had broken system.

 

[yue10]

No state in the world never was a real communism. In USSR was socialism.
That's right. The amount of gold is limited - so the consumer goods become cheaper with the growth of production. So it was in the Soviet Union after the war - every year goods became cheaper by 3-10%. It was Under Stalin, but a fool Khrushchev had broken system.

yes, your knowledge seems good was not brainwash like the many people who complain about communism but isn't socialism supposed to be the bridge to move from capitalism to communism

I don't know maybe for your USSR with the oil economy bringing in surplus gold but for country with massive trade volume the prices move with the flow of gold

 

[vostok]

yes, your knowledge seems good was not brainwash like the many people who complain about communism but isn't socialism supposed to be the bridge to move from capitalism to communism

I don't know maybe for your USSR with the oil economy bringing in surplus gold but for country with massive trade volume the prices move with the flow of gold

When Stalin introduced the gold standard in 1952, the Soviet economy was the fastest growing in the world. Up to 30% per year. And we did nit sail oil that time.
The meaning of the gold standard - in the absence of inflation. Under socialism, it means that the next generation will work less, earn more, and the prices will be lower. But under capitalism, it is beneficial for ordinary people too - not speculative bubbles, banks will not be able to print as many money as they do the U.S. now.

 

[yue10]

When Stalin introduced the gold standard in 1952, the Soviet economy was the fastest growing in the world. Up to 30% per year. And we did nit sail oil that time.
The meaning of the gold standard - in the absence of inflation. Under socialism, it means that the next generation will work less, earn more, and the prices will be lower. But under capitalism, it is beneficial for ordinary people too - not speculative bubbles, banks will not be able to print as many money as they do the U.S. now.

the gold standard is the realm of capitalist and free markets and under socialism there is central planning so I am not sure and in capitalism you are right it does prevent loose printing of money but instead of wild inflation there is deflationary pressures

 

[vostok]

the gold standard is the realm of capitalist and free markets and under socialism there is central planning so I am not sure and in capitalism you are right it does prevent loose printing of money but instead of wild inflation there is deflationary pressures

"If a socialist country ties its currency to the currency of the capitalist, then you can forget about a self-stable financial and economic system and social services." I.V. Stalin
The advantage of the gold standard is that it belongs to no one. America can print $ 100 trillion, and nobody will say anything to them. America for the paper may in any country in the world buy whatever it wants. But other countries must produce and sell something to earn this dollars. This is completely absurd system.
And if we back the gold standard, then such absurd will be impossible.

 

[yue10]

"If a socialist country ties its currency to the currency of the capitalist, then you can forget about a self-stable financial and economic system and social services." I.V. Stalin
The advantage of the gold standard is that it belongs to no one. America can print $ 100 trillion, and nobody will say anything to them. America for the paper may in any country in the world buy whatever it wants. But other countries must produce and sell something to earn this dollars. This is completely absurd system.
And if we back the gold standard, then such absurd will be impossible.

for sure it is unfair but this is the spoils of war when you hold almost all of the post war industrial capacity and establish the dollar as reserve currency, it seems like the China and your Russians are at the front in trying to destabilise the USD and hoarding gold but like I said the US empire will defend the dollar just like it supposedly did in Iraq, Libya, Iran etc, the US is fit for the term evil but returning to gold is also unfair if your country does not possess an indigenous supply, anyways I wish nothing more than for destruction of US so if returning to gold can achieve this then YES!

 

[vostok]

for sure it is unfair but this is the spoils of war when you hold almost all of the post war industrial capacity and establish the dollar as reserve currency, it seems like the China and your Russians are at the front in trying to destabilise the USD and hoarding gold but like I said the US empire will defend the dollar just like it supposedly did in Iraq, Libya, Iran etc, the US is fit for the term evil but returning to gold is also unfair if your country does not possess an indigenous supply, anyways I wish nothing more than for destruction of US so if returning to gold can achieve this then YES!

Personally, I believe in the ideals of my grandfathers. I believe that the good will prevail and in the end we will have a united socialist humanity that will step into deep space, and in which each person will have an absolutely equal opportunity for self-realization - in absolutely any sphere, which he shall choose.
But on the way to that dream is the American Empire and His Majesty The Dollar. Of course, America will protect His Majesty. But America - weakens and it is not all-powerful. I am confident that the alliance of Russia and Asian countries is able to win the United States even without a major war.

 

[Viet]

WHAT? vassal hegemony is not the same as what the Japanese did which is to colonize Asia and control your government resources for themselves. Vassal is the equivalent of a US's satellite states. You have your own sovereignty but foreign policy defers to China.

ok, you are right. The Japanese were worse. They wanted the Asians to become slaves, while Chinese just wanted vassals paying tributes.

 

[Viet]

I do not want to sound racist but I did not rep you because you are Indian, having said this I must agree with your sentiments, these Viets are in fantasy land thinking they are a middle power, power is a function of economics and economically these Viets are a joke, everyone knows they are desperately chasing oil in the East Sea because without it their economy would collapse overnight

ha ha ha...now I understand you want the title for your lovely country N. Korea. Many greetings to Uncle Kim and his wife

lies! Nguyen is the Chinese name Ruan, the uncivilised Vietnamese did not have their own culture so just copied everything from the Chinese

Nguyen = Ruan? Vietnam cultures = Chinese ones? you troll too much, dude.

 

[Snomannen]

Nguyen = Ruan? Vietnam cultures = Chinese ones? you troll too much, dude.

But both are 阮.

 

[EastSea]

Russia began to build 2 new Gepard ships to Vietnam.


RIA Novosti news agency said the Russian shipbuilding company has started to build 2 new Gepard class warships for Navy Vietnam on 24/9.

Pair most modern warship Dinh Tien Hoang (front) and Ly Thai To (after) is to patrol and protect maritime rights of Vietnam.


Nga

 

[Rechoice]

But both are 阮.

"Nguyen" translated in to Mandarin is "阮".

 

[Snomannen]

"Nguyen" translated in to Mandarin is "阮".

But even in Chu Nom it is still 阮.

 

[Chinese-Dragon]

"Nguyen" translated in to Mandarin is "阮".

It is not translated into Mandarin.

These are originally Chinese characters. The Mandarin pronunciation of this character is "Ruan".