What's new

Russia Promotes S-400 at DefExpo, Eying Indian Air & Missile Defense

Major Shaitan Singh

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Dec 7, 2010
Messages
3,550
Reaction score
43
Country
India
Location
India
Almaz Antey has recently received a multi-year order for the S-400 Triumf surface-air missiles (SAM), equipping the Russian defense forces with several regiments of the advanced SAMs. For the near term the company is likely to be focusing on domestic deliveries. However, despite the Russian Defense Ministry claim that there are no plans so far to export the S-400 Triumph, Russia is already pitching its top-of-the-line air defense system for export. At DefExpo 2012 in India this week, Almaz Antey officials were promoting the Triumph air and missile defense system.

Defense Update spoke with Sushin Yury, Chief of Department at Almaz Antey the corporation that designed and built the missile, about the possibility of Russia selling the S-400 Triumph to India. In the words of Mr. Sushin, “if India shows interest in the purchase of the S-400, Russia can definitely provide India with all the information it needs about the system.” While Russia has offered the system to several countries, to date the S-400 has not been exported by Russia to any other country.

Triumf is widely regarded as one of the most advanced SAM systems in the world and one considered an important element in the Russian air defense for the next generations. It was further revealed to Defense-Update that the S-500 is not an upgrade of the S-400 and both these systems will have pivotal albeit different roles in Air-Defense. The S-400 causes much concern among western air forces, as none of the existing 4++ generation fighter aircraft, nor the F-35 JSF, are designed to penetrate areas defended by the Triumf. The system can simultaneously engage 36 targets, controlling up to 72 ready to fire missiles of four different types, providing an integrated multi-layered air defense system.

Typical unstealthy, or partially stealthy combat aircraft will have more difficulty surviving within the coverage of the S-400 systems. Its high transmit power, large radar and missile seeker apertures, low side lobes, generous use of monopulse angle tracking and extensive ECCM features make these systems difficult to jam effectively. Self protection jammers commonly used against other surface-to-air missiles will need to produce relatively high X-band power output, and exploit monopulse angle tracking deception techniques, where Digital RF Memory (DRFM) techniques with high signal fidelity are nearly essential. Even so the challenges in defeating these systems with a self protection jammer are not trivial – raw power-aperture does matter in this game.
 
.
I thought the Russians were pushing more S300's to India, there is a tremendous backlog of supplies to Russian defense for the S400, Even if India's interested will take many years for the first system to land in India.
 
.
Good. india should be interested in joint development of S-500. S-400 is not something special.
 
.
I thought the Russians were pushing more S300's to India, there is a tremendous backlog of supplies to Russian defense for the S400, Even if India's interested will take many years for the first system to land in India.

Yup. The entire Russian military industry is going to be backlogged with domestic orders until 2020 at the very least.
 
.
India should invest in the S-500 program and work out a agreement with russia regarding joint production if we get the S-500 system any Pakistani missile will not even be able to enter Indian airspace in a case of a nuclear crisis.
 
.
3p1hhk.jpg
 
.
A couple of Questions for S- 400 context

What special waveforms does the system use to discriminate
between decoys and warheads/re-entry vehicles?
-- What is the maximum detection range and altitude?
-- What is the maximum detection range and altitude in cued
mode (i.e. when prompted by an outside detection system)?
-- What is the minimum time and distance in which a missile
threat can be engaged?
-- What is the total area one Patriot battery defends?
-- Has protection envelope data been verified by actual
missile firings?
-- What is the maximum range to hit a C-130 flying at an
altitude of 5000-6000 meters?
-- What is a PAC-2 GEM missile's time/range to
self-destruction?
-- How does Patriot handle multiple missiles launched at the
same target?
-- How does the missile complete its end game intercept, and
can it do so without radar updates?
-- What redundancies exist in case of radar failure?
-- Can control of missile launchers be transferred if one
battery goes down?
-- How much time is required to pack up a Patriot battery,
move it, and set it back up again?
-- What is the "dead zone," or minimum range for the PAC-2 to
detect/engage a threat?
-- What Aegis radar upgrades are taking place (in relation to
integration with Patriot)?
-- What is the weight of the PAC-2 GEM warhead?
-- How does Patriot compare to Israel's Arrow missile defense
system?
-- At this stage of the NSSP (Next Steps in Strategic
Partnership), what kinds of information are you authorized to
share?
-- Has transfer of technology occurred with other countries
buying Patriot?
-- Has there been collaboration with other countries on
PAC-3?
-- Does the US have overarching missile cooperation
arrangements with major partners, and does it involve
technology sharing?
-- Are other countries acquiring components of an overarching
missile defense system?
-- How effective is Patriot as a stand-alone system (i.e.
without space-based cueing)?
-- What is being developed beyond PAC-3?
-- What is the status of MEADS (Medium Extended Air Defense
System)?
-- Will MEADS have a sea-based component?
-- What is the time frame for MEADS to be deployed?


Those above were the same questions asked by us during PAC -2 briefing

INDIA SEEKS TECHNICAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT ON
MISSILE DEFENSE


I think India should go for S-400 greater chance for TOT.

India should invest in the S-500 program and work out a agreement with russia regarding joint production if we get the S-500 system any Pakistani missile will not even be able to enter Indian airspace in a case of a nuclear crisis.

No system is 100% full proof, besides deployment of SAMs or BMD system is expensively.
 
.
If at all we should but couple of systems of the shelf for deployment in the n-e airbases to counter any preemptive chinese tactical battlefield ballistic missiles strikes to disable our airbases.Other than that DRDO is doing fine.
 
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom