Russia charges Chinese man with smuggling military equipment

[rcrmj]

Their I fixed it for you, no need to Thank me.

and the prove of russia re-gaining high tech ground?

 

[HROBOS]

russian ≠ Soviet Union
all these things were come from Soviet Union's creation and not russian's
russian only inherited the major part of Soviet Union's legacy .
we gain all these Soviet Union's technique from your russian or CIS country(ex;Ukrainian,Kazakhstan,Belorussia)through normal channels using money,

It does not even want to commenting.
But out of respect for the Chinese comrades.
1. The concept of intellectual property rights (company developer) is not available to you?
Information for the general development of knowledge (to avoid further incidents from your side).
Succession of Russia (as successor to the USSR), no relation to this matter has not.
2. Thank you for finally recognized. The Chinese scientific - technological "breakthrough" is the Russian / Soviet origin.

 

[Project 627]

and the prove of russia re-gaining high tech ground?

No problem, now where should i start Ohh i know subs

Time for ICBM's

Russia to deploy new ICBM by 2018 - People's Daily Online

Anti-ballistic missiles-S-500

S-500 (missile) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Bombers-PAK DA

PAK DA - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[azfar]

and who supplied these kits too Chinese man?

 

[qwerrty]

stupid article trying to link to chinese military. i can't believe we have thee pages arguing over this nonsense..

china has production license to make su-27 parts for many years now. there is no need to smuggle, and china doesn't have any mig-29 that need spare parts. stupid.

 

[Akasa]

Worldwide, this is called theft of intellectual property. In China it is called (using the empty airframe). You have a very "advanced views".
This "backward and underdeveloped" countries by air as the U.S., Russia, France and England is not given to understand that. This is purely a Chinese invention. You can not copy someone else's aircraft design and make your flight. The aircraft design is developed each time individually. Not persist. I understand you are trying to support China's image. This is commendable. However, it is quite pointless (to try to achieve it in this way). Your theory for domestic Chinese use. All other participants may only cause a smile.

And thus you fail to understand.

An orange covered by an apple peel is still an orange. That's what the J-11B is. The J-11B is a domestically developed fighter that uses 100% domestic technologies (including engines). It simply uses a Russian airframe. Besides that, every single other component and design are developed by China and by China only. The J-11B is comparable to the Su-35BM while the Su-27SK is not.

That makes it a indigenous fighter because virtually all of the J-11B are Chinese developed and designed. It's the same with the J-15.

There is no "theft" of intellectual property because the technologies used within the J-11B are of Chinese origin.

 

[Akasa]

No problem, now where should i start Ohh i know subs

Time for ICBM's

Russia to deploy new ICBM by 2018 - People's Daily Online

Anti-ballistic missiles-S-500

S-500 (missile) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Bombers-PAK DA

PAK DA - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The range, penetration aids, and warheads of Russian ICBMs are not more advanced than that of China's. Read up on DF-41 and JL-2. You'll get quite a surprise.

China is also building a stealth strategic bomber. It will be a flying wing similar to that of the B-2A.

In terms of submarines, I really wonder how the report got the specifications on the Type 095, BEFORE it is even built? That makes the report partially BS. It was speculated that the Type 095 would feature vertically launched cruise missiles and possibly pump jet propulsion, which could put it as quiet as the French Barracuda SSN. China is also reported to be building the Type 096 SSBN, with 24 SLBMs.

The S-500 does not have the ability to intercept ballistic missiles from midcourse stage, whereas China's KT series missiles can. Currently only the US and China have proved to be able to intercept ballistic missiles during its midcourse stage.

 

[ChineseTiger1986]

The range, penetration aids, and warheads of Russian ICBMs are not more advanced than that of China's. Read up on DF-41 and JL-2. You'll get quite a surprise.

China is also building a stealth strategic bomber. It will be a flying wing similar to that of the B-2A.

In terms of submarines, I really wonder how the report got the specifications on the Type 095, BEFORE it is even built? That makes the report partially BS. It was speculated that the Type 095 would feature vertically launched cruise missiles and possibly pump jet propulsion, which could put it as quiet as the French Barracuda SSN. China is also reported to be building the Type 096 SSBN, with 24 SLBMs.

The S-500 does not have the ability to intercept ballistic missiles from midcourse stage, whereas China's KT series missiles can. Currently only the US and China have proved to be able to intercept ballistic missiles during its midcourse stage.

The Type 095 and the Type 096 will have fully electrical generating power, just like a smaller version of the A1B reactor used by the Ford class carrier.

Every time US starts a bashing article about China's SSBN and SSN, this means China must have pissed them off by having the new groundbreaking improvement in regard of this domain.

And JL-3 is also in the development right now.

 

[Stargate]

ChineseTiger1986@ Do u guys have any black projects going on somewhere?

 

[ChineseTiger1986]

ChineseTiger1986@ Do u guys have any black projects going on somewhere?

Of course, i don't have any detailed information about it, but i know some insiders in the Chinese military forum.

And nearly all their prophecies were later proved to be real, they did even mention the existence of J-20 back in year 2005.

 

[Stargate]

Cool! That's mean we may seen something somehow comparable to the previous pictures i showed in this thread, right!

 

[ChineseTiger1986]

Cool! That's mean we may seen something somehow comparable to the previous pictures i showed in this thread, right!

Last year's UFO in China's airport was our flying object during its test, but it is not that big comparing the one in your pic.

 

[Stargate]

Are u talking about the plasmoid fluid object in the air?

 

[ChineseTiger1986]

Are u talking about the plasmoid fluid object in the air?

Yeah, it was this one according to one of the insiders.

 

[Stargate]

So, if what you showed is true that mean yours might be way more advance than the one I showed in the pictures.