Tshering22
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2010
- Messages
- 18,431
- Reaction score
- 4
- Country
- Location
i prefer u go through this video its the best i have seen in a long time & one of my favorite
Man really.
This is what I said; foreign indologists have written history that we study today. Not our own people know know Sanskrit, sutras (for us), slokas (for hindus), granths (sardars) etc.
This is what is anti-India nonsense paraded as 'liberal, modern, scientific' stuff. Every science's fundamental is obtained from either Indian or Chinese or ancient Iranic (way before Islam or monotheist Zoroastrianism), Assyrian and Mesopotamian civilization.
Buddy, this is what I said in my above post. So called PHDs sponsored by church organizations to throw garbage and propagate lies.
Why do you think I am saying so much pro-Hindu despite not being one? Because these so-called PHDs have a reputation of trying to psychologically invade whom they cannot conquer physically. You have no idea how much nonsense we Buddhist people had to deal with from these useless intellectuals who cannot even understand their own history (having to adopt a middle eastern theme). They have made us look like some sort of p*ssies for centuries, twisted our teachings and made us look like a bulls-eye for rest of the world. Ruined our meanings to general intellectual classes who actually wanted to study our philosophy, which technically stems from an abstract branch of Hindu philosophy and further moved on.
You think these people who know nothing about their Germanic/Celtic/Norse/Hellenic/Roman ancestry, are qualified to teach us our own?
But if you don't want to believe me, no problem.
I can refer to you some sensible white intellectuals who are not Hindu but will tell you something totally different fro what morons like these say. Francois Gautier, Koenraad Elst are two starters. If you want to move to Indian researchers, Rajiv Malhotra and Mr. Sitaram Goel are others.
If you are curious about Buddhist scholars, I will give you some more names later.
Mhhh not sure what happens if he brings RSS ideology into historical research....
they should have appointed a more neutral person.
RSS are a nationalistic organization. They are vilified by news traders and their sponsors, buddy.
There is nothing called neutral.
Such was the colonial brainwash that today sadly, many Indians trust these cultural marxists more than their own nationalists.
Lord Macaulay must be smiling from his grave. He did what not even the barbaric central asian invaders failed.
Last edited: