What's new

Robots Hunted A Mock Chinese Ship—Then a U.S. Navy Destroyer Lobbed A $5-Million Missile At It

F-22Raptor

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Jun 19, 2014
Messages
16,980
Reaction score
3
Country
United States
Location
United States
The U.S. Navy just showed us how it could fight the Chinese fleet. With stealthy robots, sophisticated communications systems and powerful warships firing high-tech missiles over long distances.


The Navy last week sortied, from San Diego, a flotilla of manned and unmanned surface vessels and submarines. Crews positioned unmanned aerial vehicles to support the ships.

The stealth cruiser USS Michael Monsoor, sporting what appeared to be an experimental communication system on its flight deck, led the other ships from Destroyer Squadron 21 into the Pacific Ocean.

What followed was a series of experiments and mock battles combining manned and unmanned systems. Robot boats sailing alongside near-shore Littoral Combat Ships. An attack submarine launching an underwater drone. UAVs flying overhead the whole time.


The so-called “fleet problem” was a preview of the Navy’s possible future as it reconfigures for high-tech warfare against Chinese forces. The People’s Liberation Army is deploying “anti-access” systems including submarines, bombers and missiles that could make the western Pacific a very dangerous place for American ships.

The Navy is betting on drones to help solve the anti-access problem. The service has proposed to addhundreds of unmanned ships and submarines to its existing fleet of around 300 manned vessels.


The idea is for robots to scout for Chinese ships, extending the U.S. fleet’s sensor range and helping manned “shooters”—destroyers and submarines—stay outside the PLA’s own engagement zone.

Great plan. Would it work in the real world? The April fleet problem is a strong indication it just might. After several days of experimentation, the Navy on Sunday staged an impressive test of arguably its most promising manned-unmanned concept.

The amphibious ship USS Anchorage disgorged a barge simulating an enemy warship. The barge apparently carried emitters duplicating radios, radars and other electronics. The destroyer USS John Finn stood off over the horizon—exactly how far away is a secret—and initiated a hunt for the pretend enemy ship.

UAVs and robot boats crisscrossed the ocean. To avoid detection, they kept their active sensors off. Instead, they used their passive electronic receivers to “listen” for the enemy’s own electronic emissions.

The drones pinpointed the barge and passed the data to a satellite, which relayed it to John Finn. The destroyer fired an SM-6 missile. The $5-million missile—which can hit targets on the sea or in the air—struck the barge “well beyond the line of sight,” according to the Navy.


It’s unclear just how far the missile traveled. In theory, the supersonic SM-6 can strike targets as far away as 300 miles.

The distance involved is one reason to celebrate. The other reason is that none of the vehicles involved in the shoot ever turned on their radars. They remained as stealthy as possible throughout the engagement.

Experts agree—range and stealth are prerequisites to fighting Chinese forces. The April fleet problem indicates the U.S. Navy is taking these qualities seriously.

If there’s a weakness in the Navy’s emerging manned-unmanned team, it’s communication. If robots, satellites and manned ships can’t talk together, they can’t fight together. The fleet problem “highlights the importance of links between sensors,” said Eric Wertheim, author of Combat Fleets of the World.

It’s one thing to connect robots and manned ships and sink a barge in a test. It’s another thing to pull off the same trick thousands of miles from U.S. shores in the chaos of battle with an enemy who has their own tricks.

But you can’t deploy new technology and tactics if you don’t test them first. The fleet problem is one part of a process that could end with the U.S. fleet sailing into battle behind a deadly armada of stealthy drones. “This is a really positive first sign,” Wertheim said.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/davida...y-destroyer-lobbed-a-5-million-missile-at-it/
 
. .
The idea is for robots to scout for Chinese ships, extending the U.S. fleet’s sensor range and helping manned “shooters”—destroyers and submarines—stay outside the PLA’s own engagement zone.
This is a great way to explain why US Navy needs to retreat further and further away from China's kill zones.
 
.
U.S. Navy Destroys Target With Drone Swarm — And Sends A Message To China
David Hambling
David Hambling

Contributor

Aerospace & Defense
I'm a South London-based technology journalist, consultant and author


The U.S. Navy has destroyed a surface vessel with a swarm of drones for the first time. The strike, disclosed in a briefing on April 26, was carried out during the Unmanned Systems Integrated Battle Problem (UxS IBP) 21 exercise conducted off the coast of California.

The swarm attack, which was directed against a target identified by an unmanned surface vessel, was one of several unmanned systems teaming operations during the exercise. These included a combination of unmanned aircraft and boats identifying an enemy vessel that was engaged with an SM-6 anti-ship missile from the guided-missile destroyer USS John Finn.



“Our goal for this exercise is to evaluate these unmanned systems and how they can actually team with manned systems,” Rear Adm. Jim Aiken, technical manager for the exercise told a press briefing.

While many of the other unmanned systems have been described in some detail, officials remain vague about the swarm involved. It had previously been disclosed that the exercise would include an element from the Navy’s Super Swarm project. This explores how massive swarms – which may include drones, unmanned submarines, and unmanned surface vessels – can co-ordinate their attacks against ships for greatest effect. And also how the Navy can defend against them. Navy researchers have declined to discuss this work.


Multiple drone launchers


The U.S. Navy LOCUST program is developing swarm tactics using tube-launched Coyote drones
U.S. Navy
We do not know the size, type or numbers of drones involved in the swarm. However, much of the Navy’s previous work has involved Raytheon’s Coyote, a 13-pound tube-launched drone with five-foot pop-out wings which now comes with swarming capability as standard. Coyote can carry various payloads including electronic warfare devices or an explosive warhead. The Navy’s LOCUST program – a contrived acronym for Low-Cost UAV Swarming Technology – has previously demonstrated swarms of up to 50 coyotes coordinating their attack.

The idea with this type of swarm is to overwhelm defenses by hitting them with more attackers than they can deal with. Low cost is a key feature; the idea of LOCUST is that the entire swarm will cost less than a conventional missile. The small warheads can knock out radar and other vital systems, leaving the target open to attack by larger weapons. (A swarm may also be able to do more serious damage with multiple precise strikes on vulnerable points).

The swarm has another advantage over conventional missiles: a swarm of 50 drones can attack 50 small targets, such as fast attack craft or unmanned surface vessels.

The report fails to disclose how the swarm was launched. LOCUST was originally designed to be launched from surface vessels, but the Navy is also developing submarine-launched swarms.

The swarm may have come from aircraft. In 2020, the Navy revealed that Super Swarm testing included the launch of a record-breaking 1,000 CICADA drones from a C-130. CICADA – another contrived acronym, standing for Close-in Covert Autonomous Disposable Aircraft – is a miniature glider with a six-inch wingspan carrying an electronic warfare payload or delivering a ground sensor to a particular spot. CICADA has participated in various Navy experimental programs over the last 15 years and is a useful surrogate for more expensive craft.

The target of this type of exercise is clear. China is developing so-called anti-access/area denial defenses – layered missiles and radar to keep American aircraft and warships out of the South China sea. The latest exercise, and the swarm attack in particular, suggest that America is preparing to respond. Unmanned systems allow military actions to be taken without risking sailors’ lives, or with the danger of escalation that comes with human casualties. And unlike a missile, a swarm attack is scalable and can escalate to any level of conflict.

A swarm can simply harass a target by flying around it, irritate more seriously by jamming radio systems and navigation, step it up a gear by knocking out a radio masts or other infrastructure – or deliver a knock-out blow of sinking a vessel, as just demonstrated. Whatever form a conflict takes, swarming weapons will be able to play a role when other weapons are useless. Remember though, that the Chinese have drone swarms too.


David Hambling
David Hambling


Author of 'Swarm Troopers: How small drones will conquer the world,' following cutting-edge military technology in general and unmanned systems in particular.

 
.
Without its GPS guidance will these drones ended up attacking USN warship instead?
just like US MAR mission.

First the helicopter failed in its 4th attempt and now it failed to drill a proper hole on MARS.

:coffee: :sarcastic: :sarcastic: :sarcastic:
 
.
Without its GPS guidance will these drones ended up attacking USN warship instead?
just like US MAR mission.

First the helicopter failed in its 4th attempt and now it failed to drill a proper hole on MARS.

:coffee: :sarcastic: :sarcastic: :sarcastic:

You do realize Nasa attempted a 4th flight again and was successful right?

Talk about egg on your face...
 
.
You do realize Nasa attempted a 4th flight again and was successful right?

Talk about egg on your face...
Egg on my face????

It simply proved that US initial announcement of success is most likely to be accompanied by strings of failures.
One would expects such a simple experiment conducted by US which claimed to be superior space nation to be absolute flawless.
Didn't American boast how technological advanced and superior their systems are over their competitors?
Alas it can be just another flute with luck as its factor.
So they are lucky this time, right?

Now it also failed to dig a hole on to Mar surface as well?

Imagine US landing its Mars lander using parachutes. That sounds absolutely advanced.

:sarcastic: :sarcastic: :sarcastic:
 
Last edited:
. .
This is a great way to explain why US Navy needs to retreat further and further away from China's kill zones.

USS Mustin just sailed into China back yard and USN pivot to Asia is bringing 2 millions tons of warship to Asia

how is that a retreat ?
 
.
USS Mustin just sailed into China back yard and USN pivot to Asia is bringing 2 millions tons of warship to Asia

how is that a retreat ?

Even the UK bringing in their STG to patrol the SCS joined with ships from multiple countries like the dutch, german & the US.

This not even including the french.

China is pretty much boned if it escalate into a shooting war.
 
.
Even the UK bringing in their STG to patrol the SCS joined with ships from multiple countries like the dutch, german & the US.

This not even including the french.

China is pretty much boned if it escalate into a shooting war.

Well, it's progress.

It takes every major power from the white man to bone China today. A far cry from the day when an isle like Britain simply took over India and boned it for several hundred years.
 
.
China is working on killer robot ships of its own

By: David B. Larter   February 18, 2019

AddThis Sharing Buttons

3HEA753DLFGM5EUNBY5K5XEW7I.jpg
Company representatives say China has a working prototype of the JARI USV, which is equipped like a mini DDG, but details beyond that are scant. (Photo by David B. Larter)



ABU DHABI –The Chinese shipbuilder China Shipbuilding and Offshore International Company is developing a small unmanned surface vessel that China wants to function essentially like the uninhabited baby brother of a U.S. Arleigh Burke destroyer.

The JARI USV is a 20-ton, 15-meter boat that is orders of magnitude smaller than the People’s Liberation Army Navy’s manned Type -55 destroyer but has all the same mission areas: anti-submarine, anti-surface and anti-air warfare.

A model of the drone was on display at the International Defense Exhibition and Conference in Abu Dhabi.

'The JARI comes equipped with electro-optical sensor atop a superstructure, a phased array radar, a dipping sonar, eight small vertical launch system cells, a torpedo launcher and a forward mounted machine gun and rocket launcher for counter-surface engagements, according to a model displayed at the International Defense Exhibition and Conference.

US Navy moves toward unleashing killer robot ships on the world’s oceans
The Navy is planning to take the first few steps into a radical future, which, if it comes to pass, will upend how the fleet has fought since the Cold War.

By: David Larter

The U.S. Navy has been increasingly discussing its desire to pursue unmanned technologies to fight on the surface and subsurface, employing a network of sensor and shooter drones to penetrate anti-access environments such as the South China Sea. The JARI seems to be at least part of China’s response to that kind of warfare.

According to the product video, the drone appears to be modular and reconfigurable for the different mission areas, but it’s unclear what missions are permanently integrated into the system. In the video, JARI is shown alternately shooting down an aerial drone, sinking a submarine, machine-gunning a RHIB full of adversaries trying to steal it (after firing warning shots) and sinking a surface ship that looked a little like a littoral combat ship.

The boat tops out at 42 knots and has a range of about 500 nautical miles.

Last year, when China unveiled the design at a show in Africa, a representative told Navy Recognition that the drone was for use by the PLAN and for foreign sales and that a working prototype was being tested in China.

The drone can be controlled by either a shore station or from a mother ship, Navy Recognition reported.

There is no word on what kind of communication link the boat would have and where exactly humans would be in the loop. In the video it appeared that at least the forward-mounted machine gun would fire automatically at rapidly closing surface targets after firing a round of warning shots.

In an interview with Defense News, the U.S. Navy’s Surface Warfare director said the service was looking to field a family of drones that can network back to larger manned combatants, which could remain passive and not give away their position with larger sensors such as ballistic missile defense phased array radars lit off.

 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom