Hulk
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2009
- Messages
- 7,582
- Reaction score
- -18
- Country
- Location
No country is safe from instability in the new global realities of international insurgency. I would like to call attention to the most powerful state on earth (USA) which has had many outbreaks of such incidents and growth of outfits: Waco Siege, Militia movement, A.R.M, KKK, black panthers, civil rights movements, C.IC.M, W.CA.P.M, N.N.C.M, C.D.F.M, and 9\11, Oklahoma bombing, trade center bombing, Columbine, Virgina tech, etc...
Much publicized Uyghur riots in china; did it impede investment or production of exports?
And of course youre probably familiar with Tibet.
One perfect model is Turkey: with ever going increase of insurgency on its eastern border. Turkey is broiled in war in Kurdistan, which occupies oil-fields and strategic -pipeline. PKK rebels are supported by several foreign entities such as Iraqi Kurds, Greece and Armenia, as well as compounded by al-Qaida networks operating within its boundaries, so you may ask, has the oil supply been severed to the Mediterranean, Planning and construction of new mega projects suspended? Fortunately NOT! And for some Indian Trolls unfortunately.
Every country has unique surrounding domains. Pakistan isnt the only one which has spats with its neighbours, in fact there isnt a single nation on earth which doesnt have some type of dispute within its vicinity, does it mean it terminate its plans of future developments and growth.
The new global of phenomenon of terrorism is quite prevalent internationally. Difference is Pakistan should adapt to effectively eliminating such fierce menace and proxies.
Again I would remind you of the extremely hostile situation (domestically and externally) these countries are facing. Iraq and Iran went to war with each other, there are still on-going disputes regarding lands and oil-field and internal ethnic strife and Kurdistan etc.... Nigeria has numerous territorial and water disputes with, Libya, Cameroon, Chad, Niger (plus internal conflicts) Do you even know whats going on in Sudan?
As for your argument about investment which has nothing to do with what I am discussing, but I shall indulge you, maybe you should educated yourself with the current reports of world affairs.
Northern Iraq is thriving; American companies are contributing to the local economy
You might be correct about Africa but again you are confirming my line of reasoning that such infrastructure can be built-in and operate in volatile regions.
I hold my country in the highest regard, though he does have a great number of flaws but as leader of our nation we must always show a unified front in support of stability on public domains so our enemies cant benefit from exploiting such weaknesses.
Dont insinuate as if these were the only three countries I was referring to due to the fact I stated list goes on and in which case, a thorough comparative analysis of every single county mentioned below and how their instability factor higher or lower is any different from Pakistan? would be of proper order from you.
Following countries are economically expanding due to oil and have identical in stabilizations factors higher or lower to Pakistan
Saudi Arabia: 10.25 million bbl/day
Iran: 4.3 million bb/day
Mexico: 3.5 million bbb/day (same type war as pakistan)
Venzuela 2.67 million bbl/day
Nigeria: 2.35 million bbl/day
Iraq 2.9 million bbl/day
Alergeria 2.17 million bbl/day
Angola 1.9 million barrel/day
Libya 1.845 million bbl/day
Azerbaijan million bbl/day
Kazakhstan 1.45 million bbl/day
Indonesia 1.05 million bb/day
India 0.8 million bbl/day
Colombia 5.5 hundred thousand bb/day
Ecuador 5.12 hundred thousand bb/day
Equatorial Guinea: 3.68 hundred thousand bbl/day
Congo, Republic of the: 2.67 hundred thousand bbl/day
Gabon: 2.44 hundred thousand bbl/day
Brunei 1.8 hudred thousand bbl/day
Turkmenistan: 1.80 hundred thousand bbl/day
Trinidad and Tobago: 1.63 hundred thosand bbl/day
Chad: 1.56 hundred thousand bbl/day
Turkey 45 thousand bbl/day
Cameroon: Tunisia: East Timor: Bolivia: Côte d'Ivoire: Papua New Guinea: Croatia: Congo, Democratic Republic of the: Burma: Suriname: Serbia and Montenegro:Mauritania: Ghana: Bangladesh: Israel: Belize: Barbados: Georgia: Kyrgyzstan: Tajikistan: Zambia: Morocco: Dominican Republic:Slovenia Sierra Leone:Morocco:
90 percent of the worlds oil is recovered and transmits from instable regions
This type of pessimism would be employed by our enemies, to defeat publics confidence in Pakistan and its future
Dude all that you have listed is not comparable to what is happening in Pakistan. Wake up, the number of attacks happened in Pakistan in 2008/09 was way too much. Plus other countries have show willingness to tackle problems, but on the contrary western media believes that Pakistan is actually not serious. What media says matters because investment comes from west.