‘Return or be neutralised’ Bipin Rawat’s stern warning to terror ‘recruits’ in Jammu and Kashmir

[Tshering22]

Excellent.

Terrorism needs to be tackled by a mix of warm and cool approaches. Simply giving dole outs and recuperative sessions won't help.

I like how PM Modi is giving General Rawat a free hand in eliminating terrorists.

 

[Hephaestus]

not happening, as for giving up land, I wont expect Indians to give up land without a good spanking ..

You've tried quite a few times. Spanked every time. Haath mein aya kuch nahin. Aur ek baar Koshish karlo.

 

[ranjeet]

big words from those who recently bend in front of Taliban .

Action speaks louder then words . or pimp rawat ki cheekhain bata rahi hain kiya situation ha waha .

Bending over is what IK and his government did infront of Khizvi. You cant handle rag tag mullahs on the street, why dont you learn a thing or two from India and use pellets on them?

 

[GodToons]

Freedom fighters should reply this monkey with a sniper shot in head

Good to know that you are accepting that Pak army is nothing more than terrorists. Population control policy of Pak govt.

 

[newb3e]

Freedom Movement

70 years have passed, not even 7 inches of land has changed hands during this time. Nothing will change for the next 70 years as well.

Simply, accept the LoC as the international boundary. Will be good for both countries.
Warna aate raho aur marte raho. We don't have any dearth of bullets.

yabba dabba doooo!!

 

[thunderr]

Haven't heard like this from Pakistan Army Chief, he barely communicate with media but Indian one acts like media guy .. don't you think he is spoiling his image.NO code of conduct , simply wear this shit cap in which he resembles a monkey and utter cowcrap .. feelin he will join bjp after retirement

 

[TheDarkKnight]

Those who are picking up arms must learn lessons from the past, none of their heroes survived neither will they. And considering number of freedom fighters killed in recent years prove that locals are readily sharing whereabouts of these freedom fighters with the security forces.

Bhagat Singh would be ashamed to read this ...

 

[LASER1]

Bhagat Singh would be ashamed to read this ...

Bhagat Singh fought for a united India. Bhagat Singh wouldn't have wanted a house divided. Because someone is a revolutionary, doesn't mean he will support terrorism. There's a lot of difference between terrorists and revolutionaries.

 

[TheDarkKnight]

Bhagat Singh fought for a united India. Bhagat Singh wouldn't have wanted a house divided. Because someone is a revolutionary, doesn't mean he will support terrorism. There's a lot of difference between terrorists and revolutionaries.

Bhagat singh was fighting for his right of self determination, for him it was getting rid of British rule. Here the Kashmiris want freedom from Indian rule. Terrorisim is what has happened with Kashmiris for the last 70 years at hands of Indians. These threats by the Indian general is also a form of terrorisim. And as you may know, freedom moments can be successful or unsuccessful- or may take 100+years. The way Kashmiris are going looks like they wont give in for another 200+ years. Its just sad the so called largest secular democracy has choosen some of the most oppressive methods in the 21st century.

 

[LASER1]

Bhagat singh was fighting for his right of self determination, for him it was getting rid of British rule. Here the Kashmiris want freedom from Indian rule. Terrorisim is what has happened with Kashmiris for the last 70 years at hands of Indians. These threats by the Indian general is also a form of terrorisim. And as you may know, freedom moments can be successful or unsuccessful- or may take 100+years. The way Kashmiris are going they wont give in for another 200+ years looks like. While this was they way the monarchs used to deal with rebels and uprising, but its just sad the so called largest secular democracy has choosen some of the most oppressive methods in yhe 21st century.

You first learn what Bhagat Singh was fighting for. He was not fighting for Sikh land or Chrisitan land. Neither one particular state. If Bhagat Singh had seen how religion was brought into a fight, he would've killed all those rag tag scumbags by himself. Why go to Bhagat singh, think how Ashfaqulla Khan you lot even know who he is?

Terrorism is how nephews and niece of Pakistani born people cross over to India kill security personnel, citizens, kidnap tourists in return for favors or money. Bhagat Singh had honor, he never fought against the people it disgusts me how you even name Bhagat Singh along with a bunch of terrorists.

 

[Crystal-Clear]

Bending over is what IK and his government did infront of Khizvi. You cant handle rag tag mullahs on the street, why dont you learn a thing or two from India and use pellets on them?

lol .
.
.
" We wont accept Taliban as a party in Afghanistan " (india before November 2018)

 

[TheDarkKnight]

You first learn what Bhagat Singh was fighting for. He was not fighting for Sikh land or Chrisitan land. Neither one particular state. If Bhagat Singh had seen how religion was brought into a fight, he would've killed all those rag tag scumbags by himself. Why go to Bhagat singh, think how Ashfaqulla Khan you lot even know who he is?

Terrorism is how nephews and niece of Pakistani born people cross over to India kill security personnel, citizens, kidnap tourists in return for favors or money. Bhagat Singh had honor, he never fought against the people it disgusts me how you even name Bhagat Singh along with a bunch of terrorists.

Bhagat singh was called and accused of all these things at that time ... maybe even worse. Didn't Bhagat Singh not take arms agaisnt the British Personnel too?

Your argument about Christian or Sikh land is non sense - your objective can be nationalistic, unionistic or secessionist, it doesnt matter. Why is fighting for the Indian union the only noble cause? The nations right to choose its destiny and struggling for it is a legitimate freedom struggle.

If Bhagat singh had seen the rape of Kashmiri women at the hands of Indian Army, and the way the Kashmiri youth were tied toarmy jeeps ( which you claim as your citizens!) as a human shield, and how thousands of beautiful Kashmiri faces haven been mauled and eyes blinded by pellet guns - he would be with the Kashmiris.

What you are seeing is an indigenous movement now, your generals threats wont change the Kashmiri minds - they are set on the path of martyrdom or freedom from Indian occupation now whether you agree or disagree.

These are not just Pakistani nephews accross the border ... this is the indigenous Kashmiri population:
https://www.voanews.com/a/anti-india-clases-protest-rage-kashmir/4381627.html

Whether Pakistan has interfered or not doesnt matter. Just because Pakistan has done something wrong allegedly, it doesn't automatically give India the license to deny Kashmiris their right to self determination. Why should Kashmiris be punished? Even if Pakistan is involved in Terrorisim why should Kashmiris rights be delayed? India is only using Pakistans mistakes cunningly as a guise to paint the entire indigenous movement as terrorism - something the British also did against Bhagat Singh.

Bending over is what IK and his government did infront of Khizvi. You cant handle rag tag mullahs on the street, why dont you learn a thing or two from India and use pellets on them?

Atleast we are not electing him as a PM, unlike the Hindu version of Khadim Rizvi currently ruling India.

 

[babbarsingh]

Bhagat Singh would be ashamed to read this ...

Bhagat singh was not fighting for religion .terrorists are fighting to make Kashmir khilafat e musalman, no space for hindus .

 

[TheDarkKnight]

Bhagat singh was not fighting for religion .terrorists are fighting to make Kashmir khilafat.

So the ones trying to build a mandir at a specific place after demolishing a mosque are also terrorist then right? And the one who facilitated this is also a terrorist?
PS. Kashmiri struggle is just not religious; what form of govt they want is their business not yours.

 

[LASER1]

Bhagat singh was called and accused of all these things at that time ... maybe even worse. Didn't Bhagat Singh not take arms agaisnt the British Personnel too?

Bhagat Singh was accused of being a revolutionary and was given sedition charge. Hizbul Mujahiddheen, didn't just take arms against the Indian Army, they took arms against its own population who are not Muslims.

Your argument about Christian or Sikh land is non sense - your objective can be nationalistic, unionistic or secessionist, it doesnt matter. Why is fighting for the Indian union the only noble cause? The nations right to choose its destiny and struggling for it is a legitimate freedom struggle.

When you quote Bhagat Singh for your nonsense you better should know what he stands for. There's been a lot of revolutionaries in the world. Each had a specific ideology. Let's start to equate them to ''freedom fighters'' like Mufti Fazalullah, or Allah Nazar Baloch etc... Great personalities they are (pun)

If Bhagat singh had seen the rape of Kashmiri women at the hands of Indian Army, and the way the Kashmiri youth were tied toarmy jeeps ( which you claim as your citizens!) as a human shield, and how thousands of beautiful Kashmiri faces haven been mauled and eyes blinded by pellet guns - he would be with the Kashmiris.

What you are seeing is an indigenous movement now, your generals threats won't change the Kashmiri minds - they are set on the path of martyrdom or freedom from Indian occupation now whether you agree or disagree.

Some allegations. These are not state-controlled actions, it was a crime committed by army men.

State takes a lot of actions to prevent the spread of such movements, we can't let civilians carrying guns threat the life of our people. Indigenous or not, actions against the state will be dealt seriously. The pellet victims are people who are there at the wrong place at the wrong time.

These are not just Pakistani nephews accross the border ... this is the indigenous Kashmiri population:
https://www.voanews.com/a/anti-india-clases-protest-rage-kashmir/4381627.html

Yes, Hizbul Mujahideen have some indigenous members, what about LeT. The thing is, there is countless such organization, and when you see shit goes south in Pakistan, you really deserve them. You're reaping what you have sowed.

Then you can't complain about India sponsoring the same in Pakistan. Also, how many Kashmiris want self-determination? How many are leaving Kashmir to peaceful Pakistan? Zilch, almost all are staying in India where it's difficult to live. Some oppression.

Whether Pakistan has interfered or not doesnt matter. Just because Pakistan has done something wrong allegedly, it doesn't automatically give India the license to deny Kashmiris their right to self determination. Why should Kashmiris be punished? Even if Pakistan is involved in Terrorisim why should Kashmiris rights be delayed? India is only using Pakistans mistakes cunningly as a guise to paint the entire indigenous movement as terrorism - something the British also did against Bhagat Singh.