What's new

‘Return or be neutralised’ Bipin Rawat’s stern warning to terror ‘recruits’ in Jammu and Kashmir

a country who's soldier beg on youtube for food pays bribes to us.
a country in which your women poop in the open and you stare at them with lustful eyes has money to pay bribes?
a country that still get aid and claims to be a super power gives bribes?
stick to what you are best at....talking bullsh1t, drinking cow piss and raping your women

Gets foriegn aid for poor but build statues on that and pretend to be chupaaah power - having wet dreams of flying tejas over Pakistan locking radar system and shooting it down
 
You first learn what Bhagat Singh was fighting for. He was not fighting for Sikh land or Chrisitan land. Neither one particular state. If Bhagat Singh had seen how religion was brought into a fight, he would've killed all those rag tag scumbags by himself. Why go to Bhagat singh, think how Ashfaqulla Khan you lot even know who he is?

Terrorism is how nephews and niece of Pakistani born people cross over to India kill security personnel, citizens, kidnap tourists in return for favors or money. Bhagat Singh had honor, he never fought against the people it disgusts me how you even name Bhagat Singh along with a bunch of terrorists.

Got the balls ? Lets do it " referendum" . Lets see who will kashmiri actually prefer.Dont talk shit Hindu Rat.
 
Got the balls ? Lets do it " referendum" . Lets see who will kashmiri actually prefer.Dont talk shit Hindu Rat.
Buzz off. Not in interested in clowns who have Hitler images. Go blow up somewhere.
 
I doubt bhagat singh was fighting for nizam e mustafa

Bhagat Singh's fight was against oppression and foreign occupation of his land. He was a terrorist for the British oppressors, and a freedom fighter for the people of India.

Kashmiris' fight is against oppression and foreign occupation of their land too ... for the Indian opressors, they are terrorists, for Kashmiris, they are freedom fighters.
 
Bhagat Singh's fight was against oppression and foreign occupation of his land. He was a terrorist for the British oppressors, and a freedom fighter for the people of India.

Kashmiris' fight is against oppression and foreign occupation of their land too ... for the Indian opressors, they are terrorists, for Kashmiris, they are freedom fighters.

That is the case for every group fighting a state.

They will be terrorists for the state. Heroes and freedom fighters for their own people.

No one in the real world gives a toss about nitpicky differentiations of UN designated or not. Be it for the groups fighting or the status of the land being fought for.

These things only matter on PDF.

For the rest of the world, might is right. If you can fight, you will. If you can fund, you will. If you can arm, you will.

No one waits for UN resolutions or decisions.

Eventually its very simple. Its one side versus the other.

Neither side will stop killing because of definitional niceties or classifications.

In the real world the only permanent ban comes out of the barrel of a gun.

Cheers, Doc
 
Freedom Movement :omghaha:
og-gang-logo-blk-red_grande.png



70 years have passed, not even 7 inches of land has changed hands during this time. Nothing will change for the next 70 years as well.

Simply, accept the LoC as the international boundary. Will be good for both countries.
Warna aate raho aur marte raho. We don't have any dearth of bullets.

No oppression lasts forever, regardless of what the oppressors say or believe in.
 
Bhagat Singh's fight was against oppression and foreign occupation of his land. He was a terrorist for the British oppressors, and a freedom fighter for the people of India.

Kashmiris' fight is against oppression and foreign occupation of their land too ... for the Indian opressors, they are terrorists, for Kashmiris, they are freedom fighters.
And Kashmiris started their fight against oppression and foreign occupation by kicking out their fellow kashmiri brothers and sisters. I wonder how bhagat singh would have felt about this though.
 
And Kashmiris started their fight against oppression and foreign occupation by kicking out their fellow kashmiri brothers and sisters. I wonder how bhagat singh would have felt about this though.

The mass Exodus of Kashmiri Pandits was engineered by the then Indian governor of Occupied J&K, Shri Jagmohan.

The Kashmiri Hindus have as much right on the land of Kashmir as any Kashmiri Muslim has.
 
Aoa

Such statements are for internal consumption, as the people it's meant to warn hardly thought the hundreds of thousands of Indian army soldiers in Kashmir were there to shower them with roses instead of trying to 'neutralise' them.

...
 
And Kashmiris started their fight against oppression and foreign occupation by kicking out their fellow kashmiri brothers and sisters. I wonder how bhagat singh would have felt about this though.
Just adding to your point. The so called Kashmir uprising is a religious one. Shaheed Bhagat Singh's fight was for the entire country & he himself was an atheist. No religious under or over tones.
 
The mass Exodus of Kashmiri Pandits was engineered by the then Indian governor of Occupied J&K, Shri Jagmohan.

The Kashmiri Hindus have as much right on the land of Kashmir as any Kashmiri Muslim has.

Heres your answer

No oppression lasts forever, regardless of what the oppressors say or believe in.
No matter how much you try to spin it, it won’t change the facts. Slogans raised by kashmiris are self evident what they wanted and how they wanted it.
 
Desperate Pipin, they will keep fighting this way.. you clearly don't understand the mindset of people..
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom