LOL are you the same guy who is always the wise one and giving us advice on how tell sell our nations to the USA? Why the sudden change in tone? You simply don't have a strategy in Afghanistan to deal with the quad, do you? If you think you got a quad going on we got a quad of our own. Remember the names. China, Russia, Pakistan and Iran. We are gonna deal with uncle USA in Afghanistan. Absolutely no doubt about it.
May be they will say "please". But may be they will make an offer that Pakistan cannot refuse.
WHAT IF one the main reason behind the invasion of afghanistan by USA (Universal Satanic Authority) to deliberately create the instability through all means of state terrorism, proxies, (India, TTP, BLA even our own politician, army elite, the list goes on & on ) and after soften-up pakistan's security apparatus making the excuse of their own orchestrated instability in pakistan and then attack directly to capture Pak nukes ???
But it is just another conspiracy theory. right ?
Ignoring your cute acronym interpretation (which, BTW, if true, must mean God's support, think about that for a minute), nobody gains by creating instability in a nuclear armed country. USA intentionally looked the other way while Pakistan was developing those weapons, because it has helped stability in the region. Taking them away from Pakistan would increase instability in the whole region, which no one, including the Iron Brother, would want. Would it surprise you to know that China and USA have a joint program to ensure security of the nuclear stockpile in Pakistan?
(Of course, you do say it yourself - what you have posited is just another conspiracy theory.
)
I'm sorry but that's pretty delusional.
This crackpot colonel alludes to truths mixed in with illusions of grandeur that reads like a script out of a Hollywood movie.
If the US was even remotely confident in their capabilities to do something like this they'd have prevented Pakistan from acquiring nuclear technology or secured our nuclear arsenal long ago when it was much smaller and the most opportune time was '01 just after the nuclear tests took place.
If you're going to try to make up an excuse as to the US didn't invade Pakistan simply simply look at their disastrous war of terror on Iraq on forged evidence of WMD's concocted after they'd starved the nation of food, medicines and arms for 10 years before invading.
The fact they haven't even been able to stop nations like Iran and N. Korea from acquiring nuclear weapons now pointed at American ships and shores is telling.
Nobody gains by creating instability in a nuclear armed country. USA intentionally looked the other way while Pakistan was developing those weapons, because it has helped stability in the region. Taking them away from Pakistan would increase instability in the whole region, which no one, including the Iron Brother, would want. Would it surprise you to know that China and USA have a joint program to ensure security of the nuclear stockpile in Pakistan?
For Iran and North Korea, let the sanctions work for a little more time.
Stable right! Were we stable enough when india was sponsoring terrorism right under US nose through Afghanistan?
Who exactly gave US the right to determine what stable is when infact Your host county does the exact opposite?
For starters how many countries have fell to so called US stability over the years Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan?
Pakistan is next on the stability list of the US.
Please keep in mind that it is not just USA keeping an eye on Pakistan's stability. All major powers are, including Iron Brother. It is in no one's interest to encourage instability, or increase the risks of nuclear weapons falling into the wrong hands. Keeping Pakistan stable helps keep the world at peace.
