Report will help reveal truth on Sino-Indian border clash: Military spokesman

[Ghost Hobbit]

I think officially China only made ONE announcement. So now Chinese posters are officials from China? Lol. Btw still doesn't change the fact that 20 yindoos died vs 4 Chinese. Lolololol

if PLA states 4 soldiers died then the right interpretation is: DEFINTELY more than 4 soldiers died
if 40 soldiers died then the right interpretation is: DEFINITELY PLA will accept only 4 soldiers dead

 

[ZeEa5KPul]

India is straight up ghetto trash

That's just unfair. Ghetto trash is the height of culture and class in comparison to India.

 

[Ghost Hobbit]

You are the one avoid the obviously. We prove Indian are not honest. Where is your video proof to show your version?

you proved you are not honest. Who asked you to put up a tent when you agreed not to liar?

Waited till India signed the peace agreement to create a buffer zone extending into India. Else you guys would have gone crazy if we announce the truth. Lolol

See the formula if one mig shot down 2 Pakistani F16 will be down. Lololol. Vedic math

sure...you deismantled every single structure in SUMMER and ran with your tail between your legs.

 

[Beast]

you proved you are not honest. Who asked you to put up a tent when you agreed not to liar?


sure...you deismantled every single structure in SUMMER and ran with your tail between your legs.

Liar and coward Indians.

India is just a small fry country.

Injured PLA Regimental Head in Galwan Recovered Well After his Regiment Inflicted Heavy Losses to the Indians

The head of the PLA regiment in Galwan, who was sent to negotiate with the Indians was initially badly injured by the Indians along with his four comrades, who later lost their lives. The reaction of PLA was swift ended up killing 20 Indian soldiers and injuring dozens. Fabao Qi later recovered...

defence.pk

China is the real superpower

 

[Ghost Hobbit]

Liar and coward Indians.

India is just a small fry country.

Injured PLA Regimental Head in Galwan Recovered Well After his Regiment Inflicted Heavy Losses to the Indians

The head of the PLA regiment in Galwan, who was sent to negotiate with the Indians was initially badly injured by the Indians along with his four comrades, who later lost their lives. The reaction of PLA was swift ended up killing 20 Indian soldiers and injuring dozens. Fabao Qi later recovered...

defence.pk

China is the real superpower

you are superpower because...he managed to get only a small beating instead of the big beating we were intending to give him?

 

[TheDarkKnight]

Indians do and say everything but refuse to present one shred of photographic or video evidence.

That has been a pattern with Pakistan as well. We showed a downed aircraft, a bloody captured pilot, bombing video of their Army HQ in IIOK, but in contrast we have seen nothing from Indian side: no video of their bombing, no shred of evidence of any deaths in Balakot, no solid proof of their F16 claim etc. Just a BS narrative using a word here and a rumor from there.

Chinese narrative is clear and consistent: China from day one claimed that India aggressed and both sides suffered casualties. Indian soldires initiated the conflict as seen in the released video, thats where China lost four soldires - but the PLA called reinforcements later and counter attacked and thats where India lost 20+ soldiers. Counter questions about “why now” and blah blah is nonsense- Its how China wants to use the evidence in its favor; looks like China got the deal it wanted and now Indian narrative of victimhood has been countered as well with proof.

 

[Ghost Hobbit]

That has been a pattern with Pakistan as well. We showed a downed aircraft, a bloody captured pilot, bombing video of their Army HQ in IIOK, but we have seen nothing from their side -no video of their bombing, no shred of evidence of any deaths on Balakot, etc. Just BS narrative using a word here and a rumor from their.

so you're saying India is a prefessional force and you're not?

 

[kuge]

Hahahahah so now they lost on the numbers of dead, the next face saver is how many injured. Lololol

next they will ask "how many got healed?" & "how many got nonoured?"

 

[siegecrossbow]

That has been a pattern with Pakistan as well. We showed a downed aircraft, a bloody captured pilot, bombing video of their Army HQ in IIOK, but we have seen nothing from their side -no video of their bombing, no shred of evidence of any deaths on Balakot, etc. Just BS narrative using a word here and a rumor from their.

Chinese narrative is clear and consistent. China from day one claimed that India aggressed and both sides suffered casualties. Indian soldires initiated the conflict as seen in the released video, thats where China lost four soldires - but the PLA called reinforced and counter attcked and thats where India lost 20 soldiers. Counter questions about “why now” and blah blah is nonsense- Its how China wants to use the evidence in its favor; looks like China got the deal it wanted and now Indian narrative of victimhood has been shattered as well.

You gotta admire their sense of optimism though. May they go from victory to victory with many many more victories to come!

 

[Beast]

you are superpower because...he managed to get only a small beating instead of the big beating we were intending to give him?

Lol... 20 Indian soldiers hammer to death. Do I need to say more? Just like 1962.

 

[Ghost Hobbit]

Lol... 20 Indian soldiers hammer to death. Do I need to say more? Just like 1962.

considering you lost 45 maybe you shoulnd't comment

 

[TheDarkKnight]

if PLA states 4 soldiers died then the right interpretation is: DEFINTELY more than 4 soldiers died
if 40 soldiers died then the right interpretation is: DEFINITELY PLA will accept only 4 soldiers dead

Why 40 why not 400? What ever your claims are you have to backup with evidence. If you don’t have it then stop deluding your self.

Anyway the video clearly shows that Indians initiated the voilence in which 4 soldires died, PLA retaliated in which India ended up losing 20 - I am pretty sure PLA has a video of that part of the conflict as well but wont release it for now.

 

[Beast]

considering you lost 45 maybe you shoulnd't comment

We have proven Indian lied. Can snake charmer words be trusted?

Why not provide record video from your side on that day event to prove your innocence?

 

[Ghost Hobbit]

Why 40 why not 400? What ever your claims are you have to backup with evidence. If you don’t have it then stop deluding your self.
Anyway the video clearly shows that Indians initiated the voilence in which 4 soldires died, Chiese retaliated in which India ended up losing 20.

4 soldiers died because PLA and Global Times said so...even you don't believe them. Come come, let's be honest here.

 

[SuperStar20]

That has been a pattern with Pakistan as well. We showed a downed aircraft, a bloody captured pilot, bombing video of their Army HQ in IIOK, but we have seen nothing from their side -no video of their bombing, no shred of evidence of any deaths on Balakot, etc. Just BS narrative using a word here and a rumor from their.

Chinese narrative is clear and consistent. China from day one claimed that India aggressed and both sides suffered casualties. Indian soldires initiated the conflict as seen in the released video, thats where China lost four soldires - but the PLA called reinforced and counter attacked and thats where India lost 20+ soldiers. Counter questions about “why now” and blah blah is nonsense- Its how China wants to use the evidence in its favor; looks like China got the deal it wanted and now Indian narrative of victimhood has been shattered as well.

So Indian Army did not call for reinforcements ?