Both clips reconfirmed what most, if not all, Chinese PDFers view. The following is more or less what they mainly said ( I may have missed some, other Chinese guys can chip in here any time):
J-10B info are still not known thus can not do a comparsion with Rafale. With mono-engine, J-10A's electronics are about half a gen less than those of Rafale. Both areas, engine and avionics, are less powerful than the latter.
However, as omnirole, Rafale's A2A capability is at the similar level as J-10A. When 2016-2018 ( or even after 2020, the earliest when 126 Rafale could form an effective combate force) comes, J-10 would have already developed further block/s to match the cpabilities of Rafale, J-20 aside...
More importantly, what matters is not an individual weapon, but a whole system, where India obviously can't match...
Moreover, Rafale was designed and implemented according to France's strategic/tactical environment and its overall capabilities, which are very different from India's. To what extent India could capitalise that remains to be seen...
Look back at the history, India's major weapon imports have been marred with corruption and operational inefficiencies stemming from what it seemed to be fantastic exterior appearance to what they actually could do with it. The experts also foresaw the kick-back scandles coming out of it very soon...
The clips then took a look at India's recent history of major weapon-import, called "The Fool's Classics"
:
Arjunk tank (one of the classics, nicknamed "an exhibition tank".)... the price hikes of Russian modified carrier...of the subs, C-130 from the US, Su-30 MKI( VS. Su-30 that China imported, showed Indian's inferior understanding and the much less degree of maturity, etc.)... all these according to the panelists are "India fool's classic"...
Furthermore, they generalised that one could build itself into a "large country" ( they even didn't consider India close a great power, let alone super one), but one can't buy itself into a "large country" like India does, because it doesn't work that way. They said that India always hope to be able to buy the core techs such as 80% of India's import depend on Russia across all fields, the rest on France, etc....yet even Indian could manage launch missiles and satelites, the core tech of which are still in the hands of the Western Powers (including Russia), not India's.
They opinioned that India's key problem is its unrealisticly over-blown ambition which is unable to be matched with its R&D capabilities. This enables int'l vendors to have almost always managed to exploit India in prices and acutal qualities even in so called TOTs... hence the remaining deal and significance of Rafale is still wide open, if not already diluted according to the past expericences...
In the end for one is to buy weapons yet for the other is to R&D its own, all of them therefore agreed that China's defence R&D is way ahead of that of India's. Buying weapons like India does ensures that it would always be 0.5 to 1 gen behind the big boys like China. China's comparison is of course not India who is drastically overestimating itself, they reckoned, and whatever india buys is almost irrelevent to China and China's pace of R&D.