Religions in China should serve Communist Party, says govt white paper

[sinait]

Lol! Every person looks like Homo Sapiens. Buddha may or may not look like me, I'm not the one claiming Buddha looks like me.... A mongoloid guy.

Taking on the religious discussion is not the right thing to do, although you are a shameless bigoted atheist.

Islam is a Great religion, don't understand why you need to aid this COW COLA drunks over ownership of another religion.
You thinking of converting?

I don't need to brag about how I look. Jealous much..

I've burned you off in more than one thread about your story of Mongoloid Buddha. Now, it's boring. I have no answer to Shiva and Mt.Kailash, I can't verify such claims.

@YogaMudra May have the answer to your claims.

I am sure Your bum got burned many times.
I am sure you cannot verify anything as all you lot depended on are ORALLY passed down BullShit.
Maybe you should help those gau mata promote the Greatness of Hinduism instead.
.

 

[Chhatrapati]

Islam is a Great religion, don't understand why you need to aid this COW COLA drunks over ownership of another religion.
You thinking of converting?
.

Lol! you are a true kafir. It's sometimes considered as derogatory when used to describe a religious person. But it describes well an atheist bigot. And at any day, I would prefer a mushrikun (polytheist) over a kafir.

 

[YogaMudra]

I don't need to brag about how I look. Jealous much..

I've burned you off in more than one thread about your story of Mongoloid Buddha. Now, it's boring. I have no answer to Shiva and Mt.Kailash, I can't verify such claims.

@YogaMudra May have the answer to your claims.

Don't drag me into this mad house.

Rudra is not even human so what is the point of claiming he is "mongoloid" ?

 

[sinait]

Aha the old Chinese logic, if you get humiliated online block it . Keep crying .

Lol all my facts are backed by links , now show me your source claiming entire north India was mongoloid and were genocided lol

I see you are crying.
I see your facts are backed by links to ORALLY passed down BullShit.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shakya

The Shakya (Sakya and Sakiya[1][2][3]) were a clan of the late Vedic period (1000-500 BCE).
The best-known Shakya was Siddhartha Gautama Shakya, who was the founder of Buddhism (c. 6th to 4th centuries BCE) and came to be known as Gautama Buddha

Annexation by Kosala
Virudhaka, as an act of vengeance, he invaded the Shakya territory, massacred them and annexed it.

It is uncertain whether, by the time of Siddhartha's birth, Vedic Brahmanism had been adopted to any significant extent by the Shakyans.
However, the bearers of this tradition, the Brahmins, did not occupy a dominant position in the area in which the Buddha preached his message.
(No Brahmins in the area that the Buddha preached.)

Claimed Descents
According to Hmannan Yazawin, first published in 1823, the legendary king Abhiyaza, who founded the Tagaung Kingdom and the Burmese monarchy belonged to the same Shakya clan of the Buddha.[38] He migrated to the present-day Burma after the annexation of the Shakya kingdom by Kosala.
.
Show us proof that OPENSHITDESH have credit over Buddhism or SHUT YOUR TRAP.
.

 

[YogaMudra]

I see you are crying.
I see your facts are backed by links to ORALLY passed down BullShit.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shakya

The Shakya (Sakya and Sakiya[1][2][3]) were a clan of the late Vedic period (1000-500 BCE).
The best-known Shakya was Siddhartha Gautama Shakya, who was the founder of Buddhism (c. 6th to 4th centuries BCE) and came to be known as Gautama Buddha

Annexation by Kosala
Virudhaka, as an act of vengeance, he invaded the Shakya territory, massacred them and annexed it.

It is uncertain whether, by the time of Siddhartha's birth, Vedic Brahmanism had been adopted to any significant extent by the Shakyans.
However, the bearers of this tradition, the Brahmins, did not occupy a dominant position in the area in which the Buddha preached his message.
(No Brahmins in the area that the Buddha preached.)

Claimed Descents
According to Hmannan Yazawin, first published in 1823, the legendary king Abhiyaza, who founded the Tagaung Kingdom and the Burmese monarchy belonged to the same Shakya clan of the Buddha.[38] He migrated to the present-day Burma after the annexation of the Shakya kingdom by Kosala.
.
Show us proof that OPENSHITDESH have credit over Buddhism or SHUT YOUR TRAP.
.

Funny how there is no evidence of this "sakya" clan in the modern world

While pretty much every caste and tribes can be found in modern India.

 

[Zen0]

I see you are crying.
I see your facts are backed by links to ORALLY passed down BullShit.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shakya

The Shakya (Sakya and Sakiya[1][2][3]) were a clan of the late Vedic period (1000-500 BCE).
The best-known Shakya was Siddhartha Gautama Shakya, who was the founder of Buddhism (c. 6th to 4th centuries BCE) and came to be known as Gautama Buddha

Annexation by Kosala
Virudhaka, as an act of vengeance, he invaded the Shakya territory, massacred them and annexed it.

It is uncertain whether, by the time of Siddhartha's birth, Vedic Brahmanism had been adopted to any significant extent by the Shakyans.
However, the bearers of this tradition, the Brahmins, did not occupy a dominant position in the area in which the Buddha preached his message.
(No Brahmins in the area that the Buddha preached.)

Claimed Descents
According to Hmannan Yazawin, first published in 1823, the legendary king Abhiyaza, who founded the Tagaung Kingdom and the Burmese monarchy belonged to the same Shakya clan of the Buddha.[38] He migrated to the present-day Burma after the annexation of the Shakya kingdom by Kosala.
.
Show us proof that OPENSHITDESH have credit over Buddhism or SHUT YOUR TRAP.
.

Tldr

the first line of that link slaps your entire debate

• Religion Historical Vedic religion,
• Caste Kshatriya
• Vansh Suryavansha

Vedic ppl are indo aryan , vedic cast system.

The slaps you again with literally what I said , they ruled the Ganges planes

Your entire theory is in the gutter

 

[Chhatrapati]

Claimed Descents
According to Hmannan Yazawin, first published in 1823, the legendary king Abhiyaza, who founded the Tagaung Kingdom and the Burmese monarchy belonged to the same Shakya clan of the Buddha.[38] He migrated to the present-day Burma after the annexation of the Shakya kingdom by Kosala.
.

I know you will come with new stuffs
Hmannan Yazawin
It was compiled by the Royal Historical Commission between 1829 and 1832.

Basically, a Buddhist king wrote his own history based on local poetry and stories. Claims himself the descendant of Buddha and Shakya.

 

[sinait]

Tldr

the first line of that link slaps your entire debate

• Religion Historical Vedic religion,
• Caste Kshatriya
• Vansh Suryavansha

Vedic ppl are indo aryan , vedic cast system.

The slaps you again with literally what I said , they ruled the Ganges planes
Your entire theory is in the gutter

Sorry, did that Ganga infested Wiki about the Buddha says the Shakyan are Vedic?
I don't see it anywhere in that article, it only says Brahmins are not around the area that the Buddha preached and the genocide of the Shakyans.
You like slapping, pity your women.

Kshatriya, again from your ORALLY passed down BullShit.
.

Funny how there is no evidence of this "sakya" clan in the modern world

While pretty much every caste and tribes can be found in modern India.

They are claimed to be in Myanmar from this Ganga infested Wiki.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shakya
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shakya
Claimed Descents
According to Hmannan Yazawin, first published in 1823, the legendary king Abhiyaza, who founded the Tagaung Kingdom and the Burmese monarchy belonged to the same Shakya clan of the Buddha.[38] He migrated to the present-day Burma after the annexation of the Shakya kingdom by Kosala.

I know you will come with new stuffs
Hmannan Yazawin
It was compiled by the Royal Historical Commission between 1829 and 1832.

Basically, a Buddhist king wrote his own history based on local poetry and stories. Claims himself the descendant of Buddha and Shakya.

I see it no more or less credible than OPENSHITDESH claimed credit over Buddhism with ORALLY passed down BullShit.
He should have done a DNA test, pity it wasn't available or during his or the Buddha's time.
.

 

[YogaMudra]

They are claimed to be in Myanmar from this Ganga infested Wiki.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shakya
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shakya
Claimed Descents
According to Hmannan Yazawin, first published in 1823, the legendary king Abhiyaza, who founded the Tagaung Kingdom and the Burmese monarchy belonged to the same Shakya clan of the Buddha.[38] He migrated to the present-day Burma after the annexation of the Shakya kingdom by Kosala.

So someone claimed in 1823 that a the Burmese monarchy was related to the Buddha ?

This is the "evidence" ?

Your own post says "LEGENDary king". Legend means a traditional story sometimes popularly regarded as historical but not authenticated.

 

[sinait]

So someone claimed in 1823 that a the Burmese monarchy was related to the Buddha ?

This is the "evidence" ?

Your own post says "LEGENDary king". Legend means a traditional story sometimes popularly regarded as historical but not authenticated.

Why I care it is authenticated or not.
I don't want to be harsh to you as this is the first time we communicate.
Some Gangas falsely claim Buddha is Indian and Buddhism is from India.
If you believe this and keep it private to yourself and friends, I have no problem.
If you want to state this publicly, then don't blame me if I inflame you.

You can rubbish all those Ganga infested "evidence" that I post.
It does not matter to me.
Just give me proof that Buddha is Indian and Buddhism is from India.
Please do not give more of ORALLY passed down BullShit.
I am not Buddhist or believer of any other Gods, an Agnostic.
Just know that it is despicable and dishonorable to appropriate a religion not yours.

If you are free, go promote the Greatness of Hinduism.
Why waste so much effort to appropriate credit for Buddhism?
Is it there is nothing in Hinduism to be proud of?
It MUST BE SO since Gangas keep yearning to be credited for Buddhism instead of Hinduism.
.

 

[YogaMudra]

Why I care it is authenticated or not.
I don't want to be harsh to you as this is the first time we communicate.
Some Gangas falsely claim Buddha is Indian and Buddhism is from India.
If you believe this and keep it private to yourself and friends, I have no problem.
If you want to state this publicly, then don't blame me if I inflame you.

You can rubbish all those Ganga infested "evidence" that I post.
It does not matter to me.
Just give me proof that Buddha is Indian and Buddhism is from India.
Please do not give more of ORALLY passed down BullShit.
I am not Buddhist or believer of any other Gods, an Agnostic.
Just know that it is despicable and dishonorable to appropriate a religion not yours.

If you are free, go promote the Greatness of Hinduism.
Why waste so much effort to appropriate credit for Buddhism?
Is it there is nothing in Hinduism to be proud of.
It MUST BE SO since Gangas keep yearning to be credited for Buddhism instead of Hinduism.
.
.

If you are really interested, I can give you multiple proof. I have done so in the past, and can do it again.

But if you want to do propaganda, then all the proof in the world will not be enough to "convince" you.

SO which is it ?

 

[sinait]

If you are really interested, I can give you multiple proof. I have done so in the past, and can do it again.

But if you want to do propaganda, then all the proof in the world will not be enough to "convince" you.

SO which is it ?

I am not interested in religions.
But nothing is stopping you from posting.
But you will get shit in your face if you don't mind.
You may not be happy if others start claiming your religion and post ORALLY passed down Bullshit to claim the same.
What's the point?
Will you get more respect after from this instead of scorn?

No religion have so far succeeded to prove beyond doubt their authenticity.
You are welcome to waste your time and get mud in return.
If you are sincere, I would not want to waste your time.
I am seriously not interested in religions.
No point feeding the Trolls.
.

 

[mike2000 is back]

How religion is practised should be monitored in every country. What China is doing may sound bad to many but it will do good for China in the long run. Communist Party knows this. So they don't care what others think as long as it serves China's interest.

Agree. We have to adopt a similar model from China.

 

[Chhatrapati]

I see it no more or less credible than OPENSHITDESH claimed credit over Buddhism with ORALLY passed down BullShit.
He should have done a DNA test, pity it wasn't available or during his or the Buddha's time.

That's because peanut brains don't know how to correlate between archeology and Legends. Not my problem

 

[YogaMudra]

I am not interested in religions.
But nothing is stopping you from posting.
But you will get shit in your face if you don't mind.
You may not be happy if others start claiming your religion and post ORALLY passed down Bullshit to claim the same.
What's the point?
Will you get more respect after from this instead of scorn?

No religion have so far succeeded to prove beyond doubt their authenticity.
You are welcome to waste your time and get mud in return.
If you are sincere, I would not want to waste your time.
I am seriously not interested in religions.
No point feeding the Trolls.
.

I was not going to discuss religion, I was going to discuss history of the religion.