Indeed. But US and Saudi played a huge role. Without their funding nothing could have happened. They should not escape blame for this. I hate it when it happens.
In addition, the Pakistan Army/ISI have nurtured terrorist groups like the LeT, JeM etc consisting mainly of Pakistani citizens to fight their proxy war in Kashmir since the late 1980s and continue to this day. The Pakistani Army has classified terrorists as good (Haqqani, LeT, JeM etc) and bad (TTP). Gen Kayani had disclosed to his American counterpart that these groups are his strategic assets! The Army therefore instead of controlling the situation is perpetrating a flawed policy which has now come to haunt it. You cant be running with the hare and hunting with the hounds as the PA is doing right now.
The distinction should be made in order to make the war easier and differentiate between groups so that we can fight those attacking us... not to sympathize with JeM, LeT or Haqqani. Our initial focus should be on those groups attacking Pakistan. It is about priorities. A nation will naturally seek to eliminate those that are attacking it before anything. I do not believe Pakistan has funded these. They are part of natural uprisings in Kashmir against Indian atrocities and mistakes. Violence has died down because troops have been withdrawn and massacres take place less often.
At the moment Pakistan has a lot of active terrorist organisations, classified by experts into five main groups:
Currently the entire world is shouting foul at Pakistan. Indians have always been at the forefront and are no exception here. Your concerns are noted but Pakistan has still been fighting these terrorist groups despite massive losses. Even India knows that the mullah is something you do not annoy unless absolutely necessary. Example is RSS. Gandhi's killers still operate. So basically we are fighting them and suffered 40,000 casualties, 79% of all violence related deaths in 2010 and 2011 just as terrorism in India is dying down greatly.
The sad part is the sacrifice may never be appreciated or even purposely be glossed over by our Indian neighbors.
1) Sectarian (Islamist) units, which are in conflict with other groups (Sipah-e-Sahaba, Lashkar-e-Jhangvi, and Tehreek-e-Jaferia);
I will label these threats according to their importance. 2) Because TTP is the first threat. Tehreek e Jafria is not a terrorist group. It is Sipah e mohammed which is the Shia militant wing but even it never attacks civilians.
2) Anti-Indian groups (Lashkar-e-Toiba, Jaish-e-Mohammad, and Harkat-ul Mujahideen, with the Pakistani part of Kashmir as an important ground for them);
Least importance. (4) Now if you want them to be important, stop demonizing Pakistan and help it destroy the TTP. I will explain this next.
3) Afghanistans Taliban, which is led by Mullah Mohammed Omar and headquartered in Quetta;
Least importance yet again (4)... equal to the other groups. TTP is the main threat currently. We beat them then we can fight other groups. Currently we can't protect ourselves from bombings from TTP. 40,000+ of our losses were suffered at the hands of the TTP-tell me who should we focus on? And you know we have had no success against TTP. Its asking for too much. These terrorists get Pakistan they will come for India.
By demonizing the said country you make them stronger continually which feeds the counter-narrative that India is supporting Taliban. A militant Indian of yours even celebrated, gloated over this in a letter at our office in Canada.
4) Al-Qaeda and affiliated structures, located in the tribal areas in peripheral regions of Pakistan, with terrorist subsidiaries in Uzbekistan, Libya, and the Sunan Yugur Autonomous Region in China;
They have nothing to do with Pakistan if they are outside Pakistan.
5) Pakistans Taliban (TTP) led by Hakimullah Mehsud in Southern Waziristan. Their aim is to control the area of the Mehsud tribe and similar units. They have also threatened the takeover of Pakistan eventually and impose the Sharia.
Primary threat currently. Eliminating them can be the precursor to us moving against LET and other groups. But we have our own issues to deal with first. That is why whatever those 4 embassies are doing must stop but Indian policy is to bleed Pakistan through vicious media slander and war-mongering, threats and constant disparaging comments. It is the Indian narrative we see even in Pakistan today-not the Pakistani narrative.
This is an explosive mix in a country that is devoid of good governance, the increasingly chaotic political life, the armys involvement in domestic processes, the poorly regulated government economy and the inability of political parties to set up adequate political life for more than five years. This institutional vacuum is inevitably being filled up by other organizations and terrorist structures.
I agree with you on this. This is the case in FATA. There was a vacuum and the militants used that vacuum to establish their own positions. I do not agree however that the vacuum exists in other areas as strongly.
So, whats the way forward? In these conditions, Pakistans governing circles have no alternative but their own Kemal-style revolution, i.e. changes reproducing the Turkish development path of the 1920s and the 1930s, adjusted for the international and domestic context. If the Pakistani leaders fail to implement the Kemal project, the country will be overwhelmed with a new wave of terrorism.
Such a revolution can come through:
1) a massive victory in military field
2) Economic growth
3) Imposition of such a thing by a military dictator who rules for many years-even then it may fail.
Till then despite being a secularist who idolizes Ataturk I know my people... they will not accept so massive a change. Especially it will take illiterate minds (poorer populace) time to understand it may be the only solution to the current crisis. Our education system, everything favors militants.
And its better late than never!
True.