What's new

Reinstatement of Pakistan's chief justice ends a crisis, but it might lead to another

Neo

RETIRED

New Recruit

Joined
Nov 1, 2005
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

By Carlotta Gall
Published: March 18, 2009

ISLAMABAD, Pakistan: The reinstatement of Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry culminated a two-year struggle by Pakistan's lawyers to safeguard an independent judiciary, highlighted by long processions, sometimes violent clashes, and the repeated arrest and detentions of the leaders of the movement.

As they celebrated on Monday, his supporters speculated about what the chief justice would do once back on the bench. Having been restored by a popular outpouring led by Pakistan's lawyers, the chief justice will have more moral authority than ever, some of his backers said — and with it the potential to further jolt Pakistan's politics.

Through his tribulations, the 60-year-old judge has become the embodiment of the Pakistani people's desire for change and for a fairer society. But even on Monday, the day of the government's announcement, he remained an enigmatic hero, declining to comment to the news media.

He instead stood on the balcony of his house, waving and thanking the jubilant crowd of lawyers and political workers for their efforts in winning his reinstatement. The expectations among his supporters were extraordinarily high.

Muneer A. Malik, one of the Supreme Court lawyers who ran the campaign for Mr. Chaudhry's reinstatement, said the chief justice was now under enormous pressure to deliver an independent judiciary after so many in the judicial profession had risked so much in the struggle for his reinstatement.

China likely to be stronger after crisis Pakistan turns onto an uncertain pathPolice station bombed in Tibetan area of ChinaSeveral lawyers predicted that Mr. Chaudhry would open cases against both President Asif Ali Zardari and his predecessor, Pervez Musharraf, concerning past deeds.

One of the first issues he had to tackle was the position of all the judges appointed under President Musharraf, and the ruling they gave to validate Mr. Musharraf's imposition of emergency rule, Mr. Malik said.

"He has to stand watch and protect our independence, and ensure access to justice for the weaker sections of society," he said of the chief justice.

For Mr. Chaudhry, the government's announcement of his reinstatement ends an on-and-off suspension, with intervals of house arrest, that began on March 9, 2007, when Mr. Musharraf took action against him, apparently fearing that the judge would prevent the general from seeking another term.

Before then, there was little to indicate that Justice Chaudhry would become a crusader against the powerful military establishment, friends and supporters say.

Born in 1948 to a lower-middle-class family in the small provincial town of Quetta, he studied and practiced law there.

He became a judge on the high court of Baluchistan in 1990, was appointed to the Pakistani Supreme Court in 2000 and became chief justice in 2005.

At first, he accepted military rule by Mr. Musharraf, who as head of the armed forces had seized power in a coup in 1999. Mr. Chaudhry was one of the judges who validated constitutional changes that the general pushed through to consolidate his rule.

Lawyers who worked with Chief Justice Chaudhry, and later became supporters, acknowledge that at the time they did not like him. He was known for losing his temper and throwing files back in their faces.

"He acted like a Texan bandit," Hassan Akhtar, 34, a lawyer who was trained in Britain, said.

Chief Justice Chaudhry worked hard to clear a backlog of cases at the Supreme Court and took on politically controversial issues, but lawyers complained that he rushed cases through, opened his own cases to address injustices he had come across, and forced lawyers and government officials to jump to his orders.

He began to emerge as a maverick chief justice in 2006 when he blocked the privatization of the Pakistan Steel Mills Corporation, infuriating the prime minister at the time, Shaukat Aziz.

He also took on the military establishment over hundreds of missing people who were alleged to have been held without judicial process in secret detention centers, as Pakistan's part in the campaign against terrorism.

As Mr. Musharraf began to look ahead to securing a second term as president, which would involve bypassing constitutional constraints, he sought to replace Chief Justice Chaudhry with someone more biddable.

Two years ago, when the general called Mr. Chaudhry to his military residence and, in the presence of several other military officials, asked the judge to resign, he refused. The president did not expect the chief justice to show such courage and stubbornness.

Mr. Musharraf dismissed him anyway, setting off a constitutional crisis. The refrain among average people in this impoverished country was that the attempt to remove the justice summed up all the social and economic inequities they suffered at the hands of a corrupt and abusive system.

"Whoever gets power here, gets his way," said Maulana Muhammad Ameer Khan, a lawyer and cleric from the strife-torn North-West Frontier Province, who said the chief justice had helped resolve a case for him three years ago.

"Unless the rule of law on the ground is achieved," he said, "the situation will not improve."

People rallied to the judge's cause, among them the politician and lawyer Aitzaz Ahsan and an influential group of constitutional lawyers who had long opposed the various periods of military rule in Pakistan's short history. Together they orchestrated a campaign of motorcades taking the chief justice to speak to bar associations around the country.

The marathon road show gathered thousands of lawyers and demonstrators and drew hours of television coverage, which fatally undermined Mr. Musharraf's hold on power.

The Supreme Court reinstated Mr. Chaudhry in July 2007, and Mr. Musharraf managed to secure his election to another presidential term that October. But as the constitutionality of his election came under increased questioning, he declared a state of emergency on Nov. 3, suspending the Constitution and placing Mr. Chaudhry under house arrest once again.

Mr. Chaudhry was released four months later, after the Pakistan Peoples Party won elections, led by Mr. Zardari after the death of his wife, Benazir Bhutto on Dec. 27, 2007, in a suicide bombing attack.

The new government promised to establish an independent judiciary, but it repeatedly delayed any decision on reinstating the chief justice.

Underlying the reluctance was the deal that Ms. Bhutto struck with Mr. Musharraf before her death that allowed her to return to the country from self-imposed exile and have all corruption cases against her, her husband and other party officials dropped.

Mr. Zardari, who was elected president last September, gave repeated pledges to his rival and coalition partner, Nawaz Sharif, that he would reinstate the judges, but he never did, until now.
 
.
If the Cheif justice would really start banging the doors of the president house then I think the PPP would fight back maybe cut the powers leading to another era of marches rallies and protests but one thing is for sure Zardari won't bow down and leave humbly unless he has really filled his belly to the top and packed his bags already.
 
.
If the Cheif justice would really start banging the doors of the president house then I think the PPP would fight back maybe cut the powers leading to another era of marches rallies and protests but one thing is for sure Zardari won't bow down and leave humbly unless he has really filled his belly to the top and packed his bags already.

Bane Blade;sir
the problem is of the "self intersts", "justice chowdry" is in deep waters already, because even he dont want to have any clash with 'president house " but still peoples like QAZI, IMRAN, AITAZAZ & others would be calling the shots, once ! if the situation doesnt suits them!:tsk::azn:
thn what, if "justice chowdry" cant do the favours?:lol:
i guss, tai tai fish!;):lol::wave::agree:
 
.
Why wouldn't he he is a maverick as you can see from the article if he will challenge our under belly and remove it then why not he is the official Chief justice of your country and I believe you should write his name respectfully I am no moderator and you are a more senior member I would request you stay within the bounds please.
 
.
Why wouldn't he he is a maverick as you can see from the article if he will challenge our under belly and remove it then why not he is the official Chief justice of your country and I believe you should write his name respectfully I am no moderator and you are a more senior member I would request you stay within the bounds please.

Bane Blade; mr,

I believe you should write his name respectfully I am no moderator and you are a more senior member I would request you stay within the bounds please.

how you can say , that i disrespected "justice chowdry"(sahib)!:eek:
plz try to understand, if our newspapres can write the name of our president asif ali zardari, just PRESIDENT ZARDARI, thn why cant i write "JUSTICE CHOWDRY", to mr , iftikhar ahmed chowdry!
plz cleanup your head, sir! i guss you are all messed up ! here:hitwall::angry::smokin:
 
.
Look up our cheif justices spelling and as for the fact I think that politics is the one place that gets sorted from the top and not from the bottom.
 
.
If the Cheif justice would really start banging the doors of the president house then I think the PPP would fight back maybe cut the powers leading to another era of marches rallies and protests but one thing is for sure Zardari won't bow down and leave humbly unless he has really filled his belly to the top and packed his bags already.

Look Buddy Politics is not my field but I know one thing Respect no matter what until the other person attacks you personally you have no right to talk like that, I have said it before and will say it again.
IT IS YOUR PRIVILEGE TO BE ON THE FORUM NOT YOUR RIGHT.:angry:
learn this quickly it will be better for you sir.
Thank you
mk
 
.
How interesting, we are comparing the Chief Justice of Pakistan with Mr. Asif Ali Zardari. A Judge versus a convicted, very interesting comparison. And we complaint why things dont change in Pakistan.
 
.
How interesting, we are comparing the Chief Justice of Pakistan with Mr. Asif Ali Zardari. A Judge versus a convicted, very interesting comparison. And we complaint why things dont change in Pakistan.

Yes only thanks to Musharraf for the ridiculous NRO if it wasnt for that there was no way Zardari would have been allowed to become a President as it stands at the moment the President has most of the powers making Prime minister Gilani look like a lame duck.
 
.
Look Buddy Politics is not my field but I know one thing Respect no matter what until the other person attacks you personally you have no right to talk like that, I have said it before and will say it again.
IT IS YOUR PRIVILEGE TO BE ON THE FORUM NOT YOUR RIGHT.:angry:
learn this quickly it will be better for you sir.
Thank you
mk

I am sorry but I just recently had a relative thrown in jail running his own shop and the police beat him a lot saying that 'your'e defying Zardari are you?' kept him in jail so that he couldn't join the long march I would respect a leader who would allow members of my family to live peacefully not throw them wherever they please I have always named President Zardari with respect because he is still leading our nation.

The person has attacked me personally and attacked everyone of our tax paying citizens as well by taking money that was deserved for us in his own pockets someone who has been targeted for fraud outside of Pakistan and been named and shamed by the media local and international before.


here is the link to the earlier post.

http://www.defence.pk/forums/nation...-long-march-begins-post324291.html#post324291
 
.
Pakistan needs credible JUSTICE and not a politically tarnished CHIEF JUSTICE!

For me there is a clear difference!
 
. .
Pakistan needs credible JUSTICE and not a politically tarnished CHIEF JUSTICE!

For me there is a clear difference!
Who is NOT politically tarnished in Pakistan? Give me one name, just one name.
 
.
"Unless the rule of law on the ground is achieved," he said, "the situation will not improve."

Thats the root of the issue isn't it - why the demands and support for "Shariah" resonate even amongst moderate Pakistanis.

The West looks at statistics like '60 percent of Pakistanis support shariah' and claps its hand to its mouth in horror, imagining chopped hands, public lashings, suppressed women cloistered in homes. The reality of that support is that it is support for rule of law and justice, and so long as the system we have in place in Pakistan now continues t fail to deliver, those demands for 'shariah' will keep rising.

I hope Justice Choudhry can live up to the expectations of the people - his refusal to talk to the media or meet with any politicians, even for them to congratulate him, is a good start. However, in the long run what is needed is the appointment process for judicial nominees to be made more independent and consensus based.

Even if the President keeps the right to nominate (the Armed Forces chiefs and Judiciary) the nominations should be approved by committees in parliament comprised equally of the opposition and ruling parties, analogous to the US system for example.

Without a reform of the system and process (which CJ Chowdhry cannot undertake on his own) this will be short term respite, even if the CJ in waiting lives up to our wildest expectations.

On another note, I find it amazing that our political leaders manage to surround themselves with vile advisers who push for unconstitutional restrictions on the media, freedom of speech, peaceful demonstrations, and government overthrows.

First Musharaf went through this, and now Pres. Zardari has surrounded himself with sycophants like Rehman, Taseer and Naek.
 
.
"Unless the rule of law on the ground is achieved," he said, "the situation will not improve."

Thats the root of the issue isn't it - why the demands and support for "Shariah" resonate even amongst moderate Pakistanis.

The West looks at statistics like '60 percent of Pakistanis support shariah' and claps its hand to its mouth in horror, imagining chopped hands, public lashings, suppressed women cloistered in homes. The reality of that support is that it is support for rule of law and justice, and so long as the system we have in place in Pakistan now continues t fail to deliver, those demands for 'shariah' will keep rising.

I hope Justice Choudhry can live up to the expectations of the people - his refusal to talk to the media or meet with any politicians, even for them to congratulate him, is a good start. However, in the long run what is needed is the appointment process for judicial nominees to be made more independent and consensus based.

Even if the President keeps the right to nominate (the Armed Forces chiefs and Judiciary) the nominations should be approved by committees in parliament comprised equally of the opposition and ruling parties, analogous to the US system for example.

Without a reform of the system and process (which CJ Chowdhry cannot undertake on his own) this will be short term respite, even if the CJ in waiting lives up to our wildest expectations.

On another note, I find it amazing that our political leaders manage to surround themselves with vile advisers who push for unconstitutional restrictions on the media, freedom of speech, peaceful demonstrations, and government overthrows.

First Musharaf went through this, and now Pres. Zardari has surrounded himself with sycophants like Rehman, Taseer and Naek.

A really good post. In Pakistan any small step in the right diirection has to be applauded and by all standards, this is a small leap. How CJP conducts himself is probably going to be the key to how things progress. By all indications he is a n honest man, who has abided to the terms of the constitution and remained within the framework of the Law. He opted out of the bench challanging Musharraf's appointment, on grounds of being possibly labelled as biased.
I think the idea of a technical commmittee in the parlianment overseeing the appointment of CJPs and SC Judges, and possibly also COS of the armed forces branches is a good idea . It would curb the President's powers to make inappropriate appointments based on political affiliations.
there is a great need to sort the judicial house out and restore the respect of the judiciary, if lack of faith in the state is to be reversed. The sooner our leaders understand this the better. Poilitical appointments in judiciary become counterproductive, as the same judges get kicked out as in appropriate by the next setup and the cycle goes on. We need the judiciary to be independant and a part of the Quadruka, of governance.
WaSalam
Araz
 
.
Back
Top Bottom