What's new

Reform UN Security Council to Maintain its Credibility: PM Modi

Ind4Ever

BANNED
Joined
Jan 20, 2015
Messages
3,579
Reaction score
-3
Country
India
Location
India
Reform UN Security Council to Maintain its Credibility: PM Modi
Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Friday made a strong pitch for reforms in the UN Security Council saying it is necessary to make it relevant to the current world.
“The Security Council and the United Nations should be reformed so that its credibility is maintained, “ Modi said in his speech at the UN summit on sustainable development.
Modi’s pitch for UNSC reforms comes amid India’s strong bid for a permanent seat in the expanded powerful world body.
“70 years back, when the horrific second World War came to an end, this organisation came into being, raising hopes of people around the world. We have gathered here to decide a new direction,” he said addressing the UN session.
Leaders from across the world were gathered at the summit to formally approve an ambitious and costly 15-year blueprint to eradicate extreme poverty, tackle inequality and combat climate change. Modi in his speech in Hindi called for a global focus on climate justice rather than climate change saying it will also take into account the concerns of the poor.
“In our efforts to combat climate change we need to stress on those systems that will enable us to achieve our goals. We need to build a global public particapation that will help us use technology, innovation and finance in making clean and renewable energy easily available,” Modi said in his speech at the
He said eradication of poverty is the responsibility of countries as they aim to bring peace and sustainable development.
“The world talks of public and private sector. We are looking at the personal sector. This for India means individual enterprise and innovation,” he said.
On the issue of climate change, he maintained that common but differentiated responsibility is the basis for dealing with this challenge.
In this context, he asked the developed nations to fulfil their responsibility of sharing technology, innovation and finances with the developing countries without having any “selfish interest”.
Modi said the aims of Agenda 2030 are ambitious and expansive in that it gives importance to the right issues and is a mature response to issues concerning the economy and environment
Modi began his speech quoting Mahatma Gandhi on the need to see beyond the forseeable future
Implementing the new development goals — expected to cost between $3.5 trillion and $5 trillion every year until 2030 — is the focus of the three-day sustainable development summit that includes speeches by Modi, US President Barack Obama, China’s President Xi Jinping and the leaders of Egypt, Iran, Germany, Britain and France.
The document — called Transforming our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development — which sets out 17 broad goals and 169 specific targets, will be adopted after opening speeches at the summit.
Its overarching aims of reducing poverty and inequality and preserving the environment are expected to dovetail with an address to the UN General Assembly by Pope Francis immediately before the summit opened.
The 17 non-binding goals will succeed the eight millennium development goals adopted by world leaders 15 years ago. Despite significant progress, the only one achieved before this year was halving the number of people living in extreme poverty, due primarily to economic growth in China.
Among the other new goals are ensuring “healthy lives,” quality education for all, clean water, sanitation and reliable modern energy - and achieving gender equality, making cities safe, reducing inequality within and among countries, and promoting economic growth.
Modi began his speech quoting Mahatma Gandhi on the need to see beyond the forseeable future
Implementing the new development goals — expected to cost between $3.5 trillion and $5 trillion every year until 2030 — is the focus of the three-day sustainable development summit that includes speeches by Modi, US President Barack Obama, China’s President Xi Jinping and the leaders of Egypt, Iran, Germany, Britain and France.
The document — called Transforming our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development — which sets out 17 broad goals and 169 specific targets, will be adopted after opening speeches at the summit.
Its overarching aims of reducing poverty and inequality and preserving the environment are expected to dovetail with an address to the UN General Assembly by Pope Francis immediately before the summit opened.
The 17 non-binding goals will succeed the eight millennium development goals adopted by world leaders 15 years ago. Despite significant progress, the only one achieved before this year was halving the number of people living in extreme poverty, due primarily to economic growth in China.
Among the other new goals are ensuring “healthy lives,” quality education for all, clean water, sanitation and reliable modern energy - and achieving gender equality, making cities safe, reducing inequality within and among countries, and promoting economic growth.
Source>>
 
After his speech many world leaders congratulated and took selfies with them
 
I wonder why India is so desperate for a permanent seat in the Security council? Is that going to put more food on the table? Will that alleviate poverty. Would it improve the quality of life of the ordinary citizen? No!

It's just about getting a high. And some bragging rights!
 
I wonder why India is so desperate for a permanent seat in the Security council? Is that going to put more food on the table? Will that alleviate poverty. Would it improve the quality of life of the ordinary citizen? No!

It's just about getting a high. And some bragging rights!

It's our right. World is changed. India is a global player and promising economy
 
I wonder why India is so desperate for a permanent seat in the Security council? Is that going to put more food on the table? Will that alleviate poverty. Would it improve the quality of life of the ordinary citizen? No!

It's just about getting a high. And some bragging rights!

Its defiantly going to put more Indian Influence and power on the world.. why do you think the p5 doesn't want to share their power???

you're mixing two different issues here... So if we don't get or don't try for the UNSC seat, do you think all these problem's will be solved??? No... there're programs to remove poverty.. our population is gigantic it'll take long time.
 
Uh, how will letting Modi sit at the P5 table bring any credibility at all? He's literally the only leader there who is primarily known for mass murder (of Indian Muslims), how will that bring credibility for the P5?

If anything that will cause the P5 to lose further credibility in the Muslim world, where the conflict zones primarily are.

In any case we already have the P5 + 1, and the extra one is Germany.
 
Uh, how will letting Modi sit at the P5 table bring any credibility at all? He's literally the only leader there who is primarily known for mass murder (of Indian Muslims), how will that bring credibility for the P5?

If anything that will cause the P5 to lose further credibility in the Muslim world, where the conflict zones primarily are.

In any case we already have the P5 + 1, and the extra one is Germany.

Look, now Chinese parroting the Pakistani line. Credibility comes not because your lame understanding of India or its leaders but because he is elected representative of 1.3 billion people of this country. Just lamenting about India on an Pakistani forum might get you some brownie points or even a "think tank" status but will be laughed at in real world.
 
Look, now Chinese parroting the Pakistani line. Credibility comes not because your lame understanding of India or its leaders but because he is elected representative of 1.3 billion people of this country. Just lamenting about India on an Pakistani forum might get you some brownie points or even a "think tank" status but will be laughed at in real world.

Well then maybe you can explain to me, how letting Modi sit at the P5 table will bring more "credibility" to the P5?

The most important region in the world right now is the Middle East and North Africa region, that's where most of the wars and active conflicts are. They already don't trust the P5, how would adding Modi make them trust it more? I can't see how that would happen, if anything it would make them trust it less.

All a moot point of course. UNSC reform can't happen without the support of every single P5 member (with no exceptions).

And China, Russia and America have already made it plain that they do not support any "change or extension" to the veto powers, so it's essentially dead in the water.
 
Uh, how will letting Modi sit at the P5 table bring any credibility at all? He's literally the only leader there who is primarily known for mass murder (of Indian Muslims), how will that bring credibility for the P5?

If anything that will cause the P5 to lose further credibility in the Muslim world, where the conflict zones primarily are.

In any case we already have the P5 + 1, and the extra one is Germany.

When People's republic of China was admitted into UN, it's leader and father of Chinese nation had the blood of 60 million people on his hands.

If world can look past the murder of 60 million people, surely a couple of thousand deaths is still a small fish to swallow.
 
When People's republic of China was admitted into UN, It leader and father of Chinese nation had the blood of 60 million people on his hands.

If world can look past the murder of 60 million people, surely a couple of thousand deaths is still a small fish to swallow.

Firstly the Great Leap Forward was a famine, due to failed economic policy. No one thinks it was done intentionally. If we count starvation as murder then India is indisputably the world champion.

So why has India been begging for a P5 seat for over a decade, just to have China/Russia/America make it clear they will never support any change to the veto power?
 
Firstly the Great Leap Forward was a famine, due to failed economic policy. No one thinks it was done intentionally. If we count starvation as murder then India is indisputably the world champion.

So why has India been begging for a P5 seat for over a decade, just to have China/Russia/America make it clear they will never support any change to the veto power?

Famine was just a part of your cultural revolution, millions of people being tortured to death was a stepping stone to your Giant leap forward.

They didn't say shit, when official text of the proposed UN reform was passed around.
 
Firstly the Great Leap Forward was a famine, due to failed economic policy. No one thinks it was done intentionally. If we count starvation as murder then India is indisputably the world champion.

So why has India been begging for a P5 seat for over a decade, just to have China/Russia/America make it clear they will never support any change to the veto power?

I somewhat agree with you. I dont see why the P5 would agree to dilute their own power. They will never agree. Infact they will all gang up to prevent any new entries, be it Germany, Japan, India etc.
 
Famine was just a part of your cultural revolution, millions of people being tortured to death was a stepping stone to your Giant leap forward.

They didn't say shit, when official text of the proposed UN reform was passed around.

If you're so confident, then keep begging. One decade wasn't long enough I guess. :lol:

Meanwhile the P5 has already expanded. Don't you ever read the International News?

Anytime there is a big global issue, people always talk about the "P5 + 1". Always the P5 + 1. Sorry, they never mention India.

And even that was only allowed because it did not provide any change or expansion to the veto powers.
 

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Military Forum Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom