Recent Sino-Indian border conflict

[Path-Finder]

Hanuman Sir-Ji-Kal Strike FTW!!!

 

[faithfulguy]

It's still disputed and Chinese are not present in the disputed area.

China had militarized the disputed area. They just haven’t constructed the exact road. But they had been building bunkers and other roads in the disputed area. Even India agree that China has militarized the disputed zone.

Again, the only thing left is to build that exact road. And with Chinese military occupying the area, there is no way Indians troops will enter without risking war.

Hanuman Sir-Ji-Kal Strike FTW!!!

There is no way for India to do any surgical strikes here. The face off is on the border.

Oops, India treat border shoot outs as surgical strike. Yes, so if Indian troops shoot across the border at Chinese soldiers, it would be a surgical strike according Indians definition.

 

[Path-Finder]

China had militarized the disputed area. They just haven’t constructed the exact road. But they had been building bunkers and other roads in the disputed area. Even India agree that China has militarized the disputed zone.

Again, the only thing left is to build that exact road. And with Chinese military occupying the area, there is no way Indians troops will enter without risking war.



There is no way for India to do any surgical strikes here. The face off is on the border.

Oops, India treat border shoot outs as surgical strike. Yes, so if Indian troops shoot across the border at Chinese soldiers, it would be a surgical strike according Indians definition.

The odd one may get lost as well!

 

[faithfulguy]

The odd one may get lost as well!

Let’s hope that no one get lost in the Indian military. It would cause a 1962 type embarrassment to India.

 

[randomradio]

China had militarized the disputed area. They just haven’t constructed the exact road. But they had been building bunkers and other roads in the disputed area. Even India agree that China has militarized the disputed zone.

Again, the only thing left is to build that exact road. And with Chinese military occupying the area, there is no way Indians troops will enter without risking war.

We have 300,000 troops in the region. You just moved about 1000+ of them. Good luck.

The disputed region is demilitarized, India only allows Chinese and Bhutanese patrols in the disputed zones. You can't build permanent structures in the disputed region. Chinese troops are outside the disputed zone.

India/Bhutan still holds the advantage in the region, and this advantage will never go.

China won't go to war against India. China doesn't have the capacity to go to war against India.

 

[Kyusuibu Honbu]

The Chinese can do what they want in their territory, the haven't entered disputed territory.

pitiful of pdf Chinese to take pleasure in such falsehood

after enduring a humiliating defeat in Doka La according to their own military's ex-colonel

“India has got exactly what it has wanted. It was a humiliating defeat for China to cave in to pressure from India despite all the tough talk,” Yue said.

http://www.scmp.com/news/china/dipl...-learned-tense-china-india-border-row-it-will

On second thoughts can't really blame them

LOL, you realize that Donglang is the disputed territory in question?

India offically considers Donglang to be Bhutan's territory, and thus protected by a full mutual defence treaty with India.

However, India abandoned their mutual defence treaty with Bhutan, by unilaterally retreating from Donglang and allowing Chinese forces to take over.

Today, Donglang has thousands of Chinese troops, permanent military garissons, as well as multiple major roads running through it.

Never realized Batang La was considered by India as Bhutanese territory as per pdf Chinese

No wonder China tried and failed to take it in 2007

https://www.pressreader.com/india/the-times-of-india-new-delhi-edition/20070803/282248071163205

 

[Canuck786]

..
China won't go to war against India. China doesn't have the capacity to go to war against India.

 

[Amigator]

False news, India won already doklam.

China, Russia and USA economy depends upon Indian money no one has courage to challenge. India never lost any conflict in history.

Blah blah blah blah blah [emoji100] [emoji100] [emoji100] [emoji100]

 

[faithfulguy]

We have 300,000 troops in the region. You just moved about 1000+ of them. Good luck.

The disputed region is demilitarized, India only allows Chinese and Bhutanese patrols in the disputed zones. You can't build permanent structures in the disputed region. Chinese troops are outside the disputed zone.

India/Bhutan still holds the advantage in the region, and this advantage will never go.

China won't go to war against India. China doesn't have the capacity to go to war against India.

India just can’t handle that China now control the disputed area with permanent troop presence with bunkers and roads.

 

[Chinese-Dragon]

Never realized Batang La was considered by India as Bhutanese territory as per pdf Chinese

No wonder China tried and failed to take it in 2007

https://www.pressreader.com/india/the-times-of-india-new-delhi-edition/20070803/282248071163205

India officially considers all of Donglang to be Bhutan's territory, and thus protected by a mutual defence treaty with India.

So why did India unilaterally retreat, abandoning their mutual defence treaty with Bhutan? Why is Donglang full of Chinese soldiers, permanent garrisons and multiple major roads today?

It seems that India truly believed China was gearing up to fight a war, one that India could not win. Otherwise why retreat? The decision makers in the Indian Army must have believed that such a war was imminent, based on their own confidential information.

 

[Photon]

India officially considers all of Donglang to be Bhutan's territory, and thus protected by a mutual defence treaty with India.

So why did India unilaterally retreat, abandoning their mutual defence treaty with Bhutan? Why is Donglang full of Chinese soldiers, permanent garrisons and multiple major roads today?

It seems that India truly believed China was gearing up to fight a war, one that India could not win. Otherwise why retreat? The decision makers in the Indian Army must have believed that such a war was imminent, based on their own confidential information.

These excuses will do little to sooth your hurt pride.

Indians were on your land for more than two months, and for two month you could do nothing else but issue daily threats.

Indian troops left, only after Chinese government assured, the said road would not built.
It has been months, still that road is nowhere to be seen.

What ever else you do, on Chinese side of the border is not our concern, but if you carry permanent construction activities in the disputed area, we will stop you again.

 

[silver_dragon]

These excuses will do little to sooth your hurt pride.

Indians were on your land for more than two months, and for two month you could do nothing else but issue daily threats.

Indian troops left, only after Chinese government assured, the said road would not built.
It has been months, still that road is nowhere to be seen.

What ever else you do, on Chinese side of the border is not our concern, but if you carry permanent construction activities in the disputed area, we will stop you again.

China already made permanent construction activities. You are not eligible for bitchcry now.

 

[litman]

another war started on PDF

 

[Photon]

China already made permanent construction activities. You are not eligible for bitchcry now.

Not on the area claimed by bhutan.

 

[Chinese-Dragon]

Not on the area claimed by bhutan.

The disputed region is Donglang itself, which now has thousands of Chinese troops, permanent garrisons, and multiple major roads.

Ask India why they unilaterally retreated and abandoned Bhutan?