Panther 57
PROFESSIONAL
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2013
- Messages
- 2,536
- Reaction score
- 22
- Country
- Location
THE END OF THE WORLD: RISKS , FROM EVIL COMPUTERS TO A VIRUS
1. Intelligent technology: A network of computers could develop a mind of its own. Machines could direct resources towards their own goals at the expense of human needs such as food and threaten mankind.
2. Cyber attacks: Power grids, air traffic control, banking and communications rely on interconnected computer systems. If these networks collapse due to action by enemy nations or terrorists, the paralysis could result in society breaking down.
3. Engineered infection:A man-made super virus or bacteria with no antidote escapes the lab or is released by terrorists. Millions die.
4. Food supply sabotage:Efficient distribution networks mean many Western nations have only 48 hours worth of food stockpiled. Any disruption would result in panic buying and riots.
5. Extreme weather: As the Earth continues to warm a tipping point is reached and the process snowballs, resulting in irreversible and worsening natural disasters.
6. Fast-spreading pandemic: International travel means a new killer virus, mutated from animals, could travel the globe in days, wiping out millions before a vaccine can be developed.
7. War:Growing populations put a strain on water and food resources. Nations will go to war to protect or capture these precious supplies.
8. Nuclear apocalypse: Nations with atom bombs launch targeted strikes leading to all-out warfare and global loss of life. Also fears nuclear warheads could fall into terrorist hands.
9. Asteroid impact: A giant asteroid is believed to have killed off the dinosaurs. Some fear a similar impact could do the same for mankind.
Science superheroes and famous thinkers form 'doomsday' society to save humanity from asteroids, pandemics - and itself | Mail Online
@desert warrior, @scorpionx, @he-man, @Alpha1, @neehar, @Srinivas, @Indo-guy, @PlanetWarrior, what is yours opinion about this? and which one is the post probable according to you?
The whole idea is to reduce the population of world to get it in manageable quantity. Why go for destructive methodologies. Easiest way is to get world birth rate to below 1.5- 1.8. In very short time world population will start reducing. Wars take decades to reduce population by a couple of 100 thousands. In this case it will be under 5 years results will start showing.
Last edited by a moderator: