Reason Why Imran Khan wants to remove article 62 and 63 from constitution..

[Marshmallow]

Imran Khan Biography-DAWN

I, do wish to see your clueless face. His real legal name is Imran Khan Niazi, even if it is to be believed this the California court was incompetent enough to get his real name and the name "Imran Khan" was used instead of his legal name, it is also written incorrectly as it must be written "Khan Imran" as in most legal documents the surname is written first. The most interesting thing is that the lady's name is written correctly beginning with her last name first.

Propaganda fail!

OP, if the source is not posted, this thread will be shut.

Best Regards.
@muse @Awesome @Leader @Luftwaffe @Armstrong @Marshmallow @Hyperion @nuclearpak

gud point!

 

[Pboy]

“Living is Easy with Eyes Closed.”
― John Lennon

“There's none so blind as those who will not listen.”
― Neil Gaiman, American Gods


You are talking to a stone wall.

Indeed,

He aint gonna listen even if we`re showing credible and good sources.


You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink

 

[Kompromat]

I don't agree with the premise of Articles 62/63 for any politician, but admitting to a child out of wedlock and paying child support could be grounds for proving that a contestant is not a good Muslim, could it not, Sir?

That has to be proven yet,and the above junk isn't an evidence of that. And as for being a bad Muslim, well let me tell you that Benazir was Imran Khan's girlfriend for a short while, why wasn't she disqualified?

Yahya Khan,Ayub Khan, Bhutto were known drinkers,Shahbaz Sharif had multiple affairs,including with Meera jee,Nawaz Sharif had an affair with Tahira Syed and yada yada. I am not fussed with how they decide to sleep with anyone, i only care about how they conduct the business of the state.

Imran Khan isn't a saint, he admitted that in his book, i know people that knew him during his youth. I don't care what he did to get laid, i only care about what he would do after getting into an office. You can choose your line differently however.

 

[Kompromat]

Indeed,

He aint gonna listen even if we`re showing credible and good sources.


You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink

You cannot change people with dogmatic pre-conceived notions,which they like to hail as "beliefs". You can only show them how dogmatic they really are.

 

[Argus Panoptes]

That has to be proven yet,and the above junk isn't an evidence of that. And as for being a bad Muslim, well let me tell you that Benazir was Imran Khan's girlfriend for a short while, why wasn't she disqualified?

Yahya Khan,Ayub Khan, Bhutto were known drinkers,Shahbaz Sharif had multiple affairs,including with Meera jee,Nawaz Sharif had an affair with Tahira Syed and yada yada. I am not fussed with how they decide to sleep with anyone, i only care about how they conduct the business of the state.

Imran Khan isn't a saint, he admitted that in his book, i know people that knew him during his youth. I don't care what he did to get laid, i only care about what he would do after getting into an office. You can choose your line differently however.

Thank you for all the reasons you mention why I also do not agree with applying the provisions of Articles 62/63 on anyone, but let us stop pretending that Imran Khan has not fathered an illegitimate child, because he has, clearly:

Imran to take custody of 'love child'

"Pakistan's cricketer-turned-politician Imran Khan will take custody of his 12-year-old 'love child' following the sudden death of her mother in the United States on Thursday.

Imran flew to Los Angeles on Saturday night to bring home Tyrian after her multimillionaire mother Sita White collapsed, having apparently suffered a heart attack near her home in Beverly Hills, a report said in London on Sunday.

Quoting her friends, The Mail on Sunday said the 43-year-old Sita, a fitness fanatic, had taken steroids, which exacerbated an existing heart condition.

For years, the 51-year-old cricketing legend refused to acknowledge Tyrian, born in 1992, as his child until Sita won a paternity suit in 1997. He finally met his child the following year.

Imran and his wife Jemima are understood to have discussed bringing the 12-year-old to live with them and their sons Sulaiman, 7, and Qasim, 4, in Britain.

Sita's will stipulated that Imran got "full and complete parental rights over Tyrian if anything happened", her friend was quoted as saying.

"Tyrian and Imran now have a strong bond despite his reluctance to acknowledge her during her early years," the friend said.

Imran also had the support of Jemima in bringing Tyrian to live with them, The Mail said. ....................."

 

[Kompromat]

Thank you for all the reasons you mention why I also do not agree with applying the provisions of Articles 62/63 on anyone, but let us stop pretending that Imran Khan has not fathered an illegitimate child, because he has, clearly:

Imran to take custody of 'love child'

"Pakistan's cricketer-turned-politician Imran Khan will take custody of his 12-year-old 'love child' following the sudden death of her mother in the United States on Thursday.

Imran flew to Los Angeles on Saturday night to bring home Tyrian after her multimillionaire mother Sita White collapsed, having apparently suffered a heart attack near her home in Beverly Hills, a report said in London on Sunday.

Quoting her friends, The Mail on Sunday said the 43-year-old Sita, a fitness fanatic, had taken steroids, which exacerbated an existing heart condition.

For years, the 51-year-old cricketing legend refused to acknowledge Tyrian, born in 1992, as his child until Sita won a paternity suit in 1997. He finally met his child the following year.

Imran and his wife Jemima are understood to have discussed bringing the 12-year-old to live with them and their sons Sulaiman, 7, and Qasim, 4, in Britain.

Sita's will stipulated that Imran got "full and complete parental rights over Tyrian if anything happened", her friend was quoted as saying.

"Tyrian and Imran now have a strong bond despite his reluctance to acknowledge her during her early years," the friend said.

Imran also had the support of Jemima in bringing Tyrian to live with them, The Mail said. ....................."

Please do provide a better source than an Indian tabloid.

ELA test: Extremely Bright areas = broken pixeles as a result of "possible" photo editing/photoshop.

You can believe what you want,however neither this possible Photoshop nor a tabloid source can be taken as a concrete evidence.

My general stance even if its true, has been stated in the above post.


Thanks

 

[Argus Panoptes]

Please do provide a better source than an Indian tabloid.

Thanks

The picture is not from the tabloid, but let me put it this way:

Who is the "stepdaughter" that Jemima is raising along with Imran Khan's two boys?

more here:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/cel...han-sparks-mystery-over-her-stepdaughter.html

http://www.scribd.com/doc/24398599/Imran-Sita-Tyrian

Please note that I have no problem with Imran Khan's personal life. I think he is a good political candidate. But the truth is the truth.

 

[DV RULES]

Imran Khan Biography-DAWN

I, do wish to see your clueless face. His real legal name is Imran Khan Niazi, even if it is to be believed that, the California court was incompetent enough to use his real name and the name "Imran Khan" was used instead of his legal name, it is also written incorrectly as it must be written "Khan Imran" as in most legal documents the surname is written first. The most interesting thing is that the lady's name is written correctly beginning with her last name first.

Propaganda fail!

OP, if the source is not posted, this thread will be shut.

Best Regards.
@muse @Awesome @Leader @Luftwaffe @Armstrong @Marshmallow @Hyperion @nuclearpak

This is not authentic and answer of question. You are using moderation tool to satisfy your love for PTI, i think this forum shouldn't use for personal aims. This thread should close after you will bring copy of passport.

Don't bring DAWN newspaper links as they are not official documents or source.

 

[Rusty]

yes sir Imran khan has never talked against article 62 and 63 in fact he has endorsed sometimes but the report which above guy has brought is most probably right because that is the reason why Imran never go their for this case because he is not financially corrupt but when it comes to women he most probably have the worst past record among politicians although he left those things in 80s after her mother death but still not a good recorded but at least he didn't betrayed this country not looted it and left that lifestyle

Who hasn't done things in the past they regret?
Name me one person.
The issue is not what he did in the past, the issue is has he repented and has he corrected his way?
In the case of Imran khan, no one can say he has not.

 

[Kompromat]

This is not authentic and answer of question. You are using moderation tool to satisfy your love for PTI, i think this forum shouldn't use for personal aims. This forum should close after you will bring copy of passport.

Don't bring DAWN newspaper links as they are not official documents or source.

Try harder,i'll take it as your defeat. As i stated before, i can't cure blindness.

 

[DV RULES]

Try harder,i'll take it as your defeat. As i stated before, i can't cure blindness.

It will good to see relevant document as there is nothing to defeat or win. This is only to confirm and others will follow and evaluate.

 

[Kompromat]

It will good to see relevant document as there is nothing to defeat or win. This is only to confirm and others will follow and evaluate.

I provided you a source confirming his name,its all over the internet too, its written in his book [biography]. You are accusing me of "using my red tag to satisfy my love for the PTI", did i delete your posts?,Did i delete your threads?,did i give you an unjustified infraction?,did i give you an unjustified warning,did i close your thread?. Its you who is clueless over an allegation you cannot prove. Its you who came up beating your chest "without a source",the easiest way was to close the thread,which honestly it should be under the forum rules for not providing a source. However i did want to see what you were made off, now the readers can see your clueless face, you have "nothing" to back your argument up. Now you say you don't accept Pakistan's No-1 English daily for a credible source??? - so try harder dear friend !!

My demand is still the same, provide a source or this thread will be shut.

@Awesome @WebMaster

 

[Kompromat]

@DV RULES

Okay lets say DAWN is a pro Imran propagandist and is a chief lair. How about the following.

ESPN TV.

Imran Khan | Pakistan Cricket | Cricket Players and Officials | ESPN Cricinfo

The Guardian UK

"Imran Ahmad Khan Niazi, 59 years old, currently of Bani Gala village on the outskirts of the Pakistani capital of Islamabad, is certain of many things. He is certain that "a huge change" is coming to his country. He is certain, too, that a "revolution" is on its way. And even if he does not state it explicitly, he is certain that he will, within eight months to a year, win a landslide victory in elections to become Pakistan's prime minister. "When we are in power", he says these days, not "if we were in power".

The Amazon

Amazon.com: Imran Khan: Books, Biography, Blog, Audiobooks, Kindle



They must be evil lairs too,right?

 

[DV RULES]

I provided you a source confirming his name,its all over the internet too, its written in his book [biography]. You are accusing me of "using my red tag to satisfy my love for the PTI", did i delete your posts?,Did i delete your threads?,did i give you an unjustified infraction?,did i give you an unjustified warning,did i close your thread?. Its you who is clueless over an allegation you cannot prove. Its you who came up beating your chest "without a source",the easiest way was to close the thread,which honestly it should be under the forum rules for not providing a source. However i did want to see what you were made off, now the readers can see your clueless face, you have "nothing" to back your argument up. Now you say you don't accept Pakistan's No-1 English daily for a credible source??? - so try harder dear friend !!

My demand is still the same, provide a source or this thread will be shut.

@Awesome @WebMaster

Believe: i am not clueless. I ever posted on the bases of something.
Second: I was right in posting GHQ because such issues are not usually discussed openly but through PM.
What i observed i wrote and you have total right to disagree.
I hope you will continue this issue through PM.

 

[Awesome]

Thank you for all the reasons you mention why I also do not agree with applying the provisions of Articles 62/63 on anyone, but let us stop pretending that Imran Khan has not fathered an illegitimate child, because he has, clearly:

Imran to take custody of 'love child'

"Pakistan's cricketer-turned-politician Imran Khan will take custody of his 12-year-old 'love child' following the sudden death of her mother in the United States on Thursday.

Imran flew to Los Angeles on Saturday night to bring home Tyrian after her multimillionaire mother Sita White collapsed, having apparently suffered a heart attack near her home in Beverly Hills, a report said in London on Sunday.

Quoting her friends, The Mail on Sunday said the 43-year-old Sita, a fitness fanatic, had taken steroids, which exacerbated an existing heart condition.

For years, the 51-year-old cricketing legend refused to acknowledge Tyrian, born in 1992, as his child until Sita won a paternity suit in 1997. He finally met his child the following year.

Imran and his wife Jemima are understood to have discussed bringing the 12-year-old to live with them and their sons Sulaiman, 7, and Qasim, 4, in Britain.

Sita's will stipulated that Imran got "full and complete parental rights over Tyrian if anything happened", her friend was quoted as saying.

"Tyrian and Imran now have a strong bond despite his reluctance to acknowledge her during her early years," the friend said.

Imran also had the support of Jemima in bringing Tyrian to live with them, The Mail said. ....................."

Meri zaat pe koi farak parhta hai if he screwed one or 10 chicks in his youth? This is a stupid, typically paindu thing to discuss.