Reason Why Imran Khan wants to remove article 62 and 63 from constitution..

[mcuk2001]

 

[Kompromat]

1: when did Imran Khan say that he's against the article 62 & 63?

2: Please provide a credible source and also provide a source for the above document.

3: Imran Khan's legal name is Imran Khan Niazi. If this document is authentic than why isn't the full name written instead of a commonly used name?

Don't quote me until you have authentic information about the above 3 questions.

Best Regards

 

[Zarvan]

1: when did Imran Khan say that he's against the article 62 & 63?

2: Please provide a credible source and also provide a source for the above document.

3: Imran Khan's legal name is Imran Khan Niazi. If this document is authentic than why isn't the full name written instead of a commonly used name?

Don't quote me until you have authentic information about the above 3 questions.

Best Regards

yes sir Imran khan has never talked against article 62 and 63 in fact he has endorsed sometimes but the report which above guy has brought is most probably right because that is the reason why Imran never go their for this case because he is not financially corrupt but when it comes to women he most probably have the worst past record among politicians although he left those things in 80s after her mother death but still not a good recorded but at least he didn't betrayed this country not looted it and left that lifestyle

 

[Silverblaze]

1: when did Imran Khan say that he's against the article 62 & 63?

2: Please provide a credible source and also provide a source for the above document.

3: Imran Khan's legal name is Imran Khan Niazi. If this document is authentic than why isn't the full name written instead of a commonly used name?

Don't quote me until you have authentic information about the above 3 questions.

Best Regards

In one of his programs with Najam Sethi, he did say that 62 and 63 should be limited to financial corruption. But he never said about removing it outright. And this is a reasonable approach.

 

[W.11]

this is the delimma of our country instead of talking objectively we follow the foot steps of these dirty politicians whose best wepon is to hit on some one's private life

we should be talking about corruption tax evasion, bank default but we are more interested about dua qanoot and if he is a perfect muslim and if he is has a bastard or not

 

[Guvera]

I knew this is gonna happen, the same old dirty politics, pasting fake documents, fake images and stuff, all i wana say is GET A LIFE YOU CRAZY LOSER

 

[Pboy]

Source?

With source I mean a credible source and not a blog or a junkie source.

Though I agree with Imran`s point that this law should be limited to financial corruption. This perfect muslim rule is ridiculous and hillarious . No ones perfect. No one can ever be perfect.

 

[xyxmt]

In one of his programs with Najam Sethi, he did say that 62 and 63 should be limited to financial corruption. But he never said about removing it outright. And this is a reasonable approach.

doesnt everyone wants 62 and 63 to support their past

 

[Argus Panoptes]

1: when did Imran Khan say that he's against the article 62 & 63?

2: Please provide a credible source and also provide a source for the above document.

3: Imran Khan's legal name is Imran Khan Niazi. If this document is authentic than why isn't the full name written instead of a commonly used name?

Don't quote me until you have authentic information about the above 3 questions.

Best Regards

I don't agree with the premise of Articles 62/63 for any politician, but admitting to a child out of wedlock and paying child support could be grounds for proving that a contestant is not a good Muslim, could it not, Sir?

 

[Guvera]

This is the same fake, internet downloaded document that has been shown to the returning officer of NA-56 Rawalpindi just to stop imran khan to contest from there, but let me assure u that inshaallah his papers will be accepted and he will win with the thumping majurity.

 

[Soumitra]

Sorry just curious what are the articles 62 and 63 of the Pakistan constitution ?

 

[DV RULES]

1: when did Imran Khan say that he's against the article 62 & 63?

2: Please provide a credible source and also provide a source for the above document.

3: Imran Khan's legal name is Imran Khan Niazi. If this document is authentic than why isn't the full name written instead of a commonly used name?

Don't quote me until you have authentic information about the above 3 questions.

Best Regards

Well, you have to show copy of Passport of IK where it's written that His name is Imran Khan Niazi.
Please don't quote until you have this document.

 

[Kompromat]

Well, you have to show copy of Passport of IK where it's written that His name is Imran Khan Niazi.
Please don't quote until you have this document.

Imran Khan Biography-DAWN

I, do wish to see your clueless face. His real legal name is Imran Khan Niazi, even if it is to be believed that, the California court was incompetent enough to use his real name and the name "Imran Khan" was used instead of his legal name, it is also written incorrectly as it must be written "Khan Imran" as in most legal documents the surname is written first. The most interesting thing is that the lady's name is written correctly beginning with her last name first.

Propaganda fail!

OP, if the source is not posted, this thread will be shut.

Best Regards.
@muse @Awesome @Leader @Luftwaffe @Armstrong @Marshmallow @Hyperion @nuclearpak

 

[Pboy]

Seriously Guys.

The World Cup winning captain,

Legendary player.

And you guys dont know that his name is Imran Khan Niazi :/

 

[Kompromat]

Seriously Guys.

The World Cup winning captain,

Legendary player.

And you guys dont know that his name is Imran Khan Niazi :/

“Living is Easy with Eyes Closed.”
― John Lennon

“There's none so blind as those who will not listen.”
― Neil Gaiman, American Gods


You are talking to a stone wall.