What's new

real history of Sind, you wont be taught in schools

W.11

BANNED
Joined
Jan 20, 2011
Messages
15,032
Reaction score
-32
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
in 6000 years of glorious Sind history, only the foreigners have remained the rulers of Sind, whether be it balochs, turks, persians, english, egyptians, arabs

today the rulers of Sind and feudal class Sindis who are not real Sindis (baloch/persian/arab/turk) fool their innocent Sindi slaves in believing about their glorious past in order to keep the real Sindis their slaves so that they can ever remain wealthy and rule Sind with their tyranny and they keep real Sindis their slaves and no development reaches the real Sindis so that the real Sindis couldn't fight back and free themselves from the chains of slavery from fake imported Sindis

the fake ruling Sindi elite plays the drama of Sindi nationalism when ever their rule is challenged by middle class Sindis

Khara Such about All Political Parties: 6000 years old History of Sindh

6000 years old History of Sindh.png



1459886_754005894626801_1434653812_n.jpg
 
Last edited:
why do sindhis then vote for them.... and who are the original sindhi tribes?
 
why do sindhis then vote for them.... and who are the original sindhi tribes?

the sindis have no tribe they are the slaves of all the invaders they so frequently let in who ruled over them for centuries and yet when you ever talk about separate province, free from feudal sindis, the sindi slaves get defensive about the glorious sindi history which is infact marred by sindi slavery and nothing else

the real sindis are the farmer class sindis who work on the lands of their feudals

the sindis have to vote because they have leased the lands from the feudals in order to work perpetually on their feudal lands, they have to pay the rent by working day and night on their feudal lands, they don't even own their own small piece of lands

so during elections they are all gathered and collected in buses and told to vote for their feudal other wise they will lose their lands

every famous sindi title like sumro, palijo, rind, jaam, kalhoro, khoro, talpur, magsi, zardari, mirza, durani all are non sindis

the hindu history of sind had divided the sind society into several class, the top one was brahmin, then the soldier class, the lowest two were of the farmer class and the untouchable class, the real sindis still dont get promoted above those lowest class in my opinion, they are still slaves of the higher class of ancient hindu class division
 
every famous sindi title like sumro, palijo, rind, jaam, kalhoro, khoro, talpur, magsi, zardari, mirza, durani all are non sindis

Same is the case with south Punjab as well (i.e. gillani, qureshi, hashmi etc.) - As they can't score majority in Punjab like Sindh, that's why they want to divide it - so that they can make sindh like kingdom there.
 
Same is the case with south Punjab as well (i.e. gillani, qureshi, hashmi etc.) - As they can't score majority in Punjab like Sindh, that's why they want to divide it - so that they can make sindh like kingdom there.

i don't think the gilanis, hashmis and qureshis ever demanded separate south punjab province
 
So, who is demanding? and who are land lords of south Punjab?

the demand of south punjab has primarily been from the poor class of seraiki people, it has a mix of ethnic nationalism, economic situation etc the south punjab districts are a lot poorer as compared to central andnorth punjab regions

the feudal class of south punjab will never make it a separate province because of the big share they get in the punjab govt and the federal govt

just like a separate sindh province demand never got support from the feudals of lower sindh

politicians like jamshed dasti supporting a separate province
 
Thts nonsense.. I can count several Sindhi dynasties.. like the Kalohros,Sammas,Talpurs,Soomros,Rais-Rajputs etc etc..
 
Thts nonsense.. I can count several Sindhi dynasties.. like the Kalohros,Sammas,Talpurs,Soomros,Rais-Rajputs etc etc..

soomros are descended from abbasids, kalhoros are also of arab/baloch origin, talpurs are baloch origin, rajputs are no way sindhis
 
Last edited:
Soomros:

Soomro - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
talpurs etc are of baloch origin but sindhi by language,customs etc... and yes there are Sindhi Rajputs ...like Rai dynasty,Bhuttos etc...

rajputs are not sindhis, rajputs are from northern part of india/punjab region

they are naturalised sindis, not ethnic sindis, they are as much sindis as rinds, zardaris, gabols etc all are which are nuturalised baloch sindis not ethnic sindis
 
the demand of south punjab has primarily been from the poor class of seraiki people, it has a mix of ethnic nationalism, economic situation etc the south punjab districts are a lot poorer as compared to central andnorth punjab regions

the feudal class of south punjab will never make it a separate province because of the big share they get in the punjab govt and the federal govt

just like a separate sindh province demand never got support from the feudals of lower sindh

politicians like jamshed dasti supporting a separate province

You really have no Idea of politics of south Punjab.
 
Does it make a difference or rather .. should it make a difference ?
 

Latest posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom