It is understandable of not liking him for the Assyrian Christians.
It is good that you understand that, at the least.
However, he is not really a monster for the Sunni Muslims who are the majority in Iraq. And most people he killed were Shia Muslim Kurds who were mostly separatists.
You are lacking in the most basic understanding of my country. Saddam WAS a monster of the worst kind and spawned monsters who, if they had survived, and thanks to God that they did not, would have been worse than him.
The majority of Kurds are Sunni. The biggest problem for the Kurds as far as Saddam was concerned is that they are not Arab. Their desire to determine their own future as a people was as big an issue as their desire to profit from the oil fields in their home area. Saddam was determined to oppress their self-determination and keep the oil profits for himself and his cronies. The only thing he liked about the Kurds was the trouble they caused the Turks.
The Shia are generally concentrated in the southeast and near the Iranian border. The Shia are heretical as far as the Sunni are concerned, and
they outnumber the Sunni by 60%-65% to 35%-37%. They were a threat to Sunni dominance in Iraq, not separatists.
Indeed, Saddam was a dictator, but even a dictator won't kill his own people for no reason or intentionally ruined his country.
He DID kill his own people to terrorise them into submission, including members of his own family, to consolidate and increase his power. He had "reasons" to kill Kurds, Christians, and Shia, but they were those no civilized person could countenance. His plan was not to "ruin his country," it was to absolutely dominate and control it through terror and "Arabisation."
Next time you attempt to post drivel, please ensure that you are not addressing someone who was there.