What's new

Re-discover Power of Coal: China Advances in Clean Coal & CTX Technology

American Aquatech's Zero Liquid Discharge (ZLD) technology used in China's Shenhua coal-to-oil plant

"ZLD is a water treatment process in which all the wastewater produced is purified and recycled for use. This will leave no liquid discharge at the end of the treatment cycle.

The ZLD plant, supplied by Aquatech, will recycle 55 million liters of wastewater per day (2,300 cubic meters per hour) generated by the four million tons per year CTL plant.

The recycled water will be treated to achieve a high purity level, then will be reused in the CTL processing facility. This will eliminate all wastewater discharge from the plant."

Eliminating Wastewater in Coal to Liquid Fuel Production > ENGINEERING.com

e7bwNEC.jpg

----------


Aquatech's website: Zero Liquid Discharge Technology - ZLD | Aquatech
 
.
American Aquatech's Zero Liquid Discharge (ZLD) technology used in China's Shenhua coal-to-oil plant

"ZLD is a water treatment process in which all the wastewater produced is purified and recycled for use. This will leave no liquid discharge at the end of the treatment cycle.

The ZLD plant, supplied by Aquatech, will recycle 55 million liters of wastewater per day (2,300 cubic meters per hour) generated by the four million tons per year CTL plant.

The recycled water will be treated to achieve a high purity level, then will be reused in the CTL processing facility. This will eliminate all wastewater discharge from the plant."

Eliminating Wastewater in Coal to Liquid Fuel Production > ENGINEERING.com

e7bwNEC.jpg

----------


Aquatech's website: Zero Liquid Discharge Technology - ZLD | Aquatech

Great answer to the pollution problems
Excellent reports @Martian2
 
.
Zero Liquid Discharge technology is 95% efficient. Only 5% of the water is lost.

By using Zero Liquid Discharge technology, the same amount of water can be used to produce 20 times the amount of coal-to-oil product.


 
Last edited:
.
wow, a really nice and informative thread.

I didn't know about coal to oil thing before.
Is there any advantage of coal to oil over coal to gas or the other way ?

Best of luck for chinese brothers in achieving their mile stones (Y)
 
.
The Chinese government has announced new target of cutting pollution from coal-fired power plants by 60 percent by 2020.

By upgrading the plants, China aims for a reduction in raw coal use of around 100 million metric tons, which would help improve its own environment and help contribute to a better world.

During his stay in Paris for the climate talks, Chinese President Xi Jinping reiterated China's commitment to helping in the global struggle to limit the effects of climate change.

China's bid to reduce emissions means a big market for those countries, such as Japan, that are at the cutting edge of energy efficiency and environmental protection.

China and Japan have cooperated in this field for three decades. They launched an annual forum on improving energy efficiency and environmental protection in 2006, at which their officials, researchers and entrepreneurs put their heads together to find areas for cooperation. They signed 26 deals on saving energy and protecting environment on the eve of the Paris climate talks, increasing the number of projects to 259 in nine years.

If China wants to take a leading role in climate change and sustainable energy policy, it would do well to look at the lessons from Japan's experience.

When Japan's economy grew at an annual rate of 10 percent in the 1960s, air pollution in several cities was alarming. Emissions of nitrogen dioxide, carbon monoxide and sulfur dioxide tripled, causing the pollution-related illnesses such as Yokkaichi asthma and Minamata disease (mercury poisoning)-both named after the cities where they first appeared-and cadmium poisoning.

It was the oil crisis in the 1970s that catalyzed the rapid turnaround that allowed Japan to become an "efficiency superpower".

Japan charted a clear course and gave marching orders to its bureaucracy. What followed was a wholesale reorganization of the government's attitude toward energy security and a nationwide effort to reduce energy consumption, and promote better conservation and efficiency. By harnessing the conservation efforts of millions of households and businesses, Japan succeeded in restraining the growth in its energy consumption even as its economy continued to expand throughout the 1980s and 1990s. By most estimates, Japan leads the world today in energy efficiency.

To some extent, Japan has cleaned itself up through a shift to lighter manufacturing and allowing its companies to move much of their energy-intensive primary processing to other countries while concentrating on high-tech products further up the value chain. China can still learn from Japan how to become more energy efficient and how to protect its environment from rapid industrialization.

Japan provided China with loans for several years to put toward important environmental initiatives, such as installing desulfurization and dust collection systems at ironworks, building water supply systems and constructing sewage networks. Japan's support and experience mean a lot to China.

And there is plenty of room for the two countries to strengthen their cooperation in energy saving and environmental protection.

China is thirsty for Japan's advanced environmental technologies, and China remains a big, relatively cheap laboratory for Japanese companies to do research and development.

China frequently sees many of its cities wreathed in choking smog and has to deal with other severe environmental problems, while Japan is still struggling to move out of recession. So this is would be a win-win proposition.

The author is China Daily's Tokyo bureau chief.

Lessons can be learned from Japan's energy efficiency experience[2]- Chinadaily.com.cn
 
.
China is thirsty for Japan's advanced environmental technologies, and China remains a big, relatively cheap laboratory for Japanese companies to do research and development.

China frequently sees many of its cities wreathed in choking smog and has to deal with other severe environmental problems, while Japan is still struggling to move out of recession. So this is would be a win-win proposition.

:tup::tup:
 
. .
Lessons from Japan's progress in cleaning up smog
December 9, 2015 by By Elaine Kurtenbach
lessonsfromj.jpg

In this Feb. 1970 file photo, thick fumes from industrial complex cover the area in Amagasaki, Hyogo Prefecture, western Japan. Japanese suffered from dire pollution problems for nearly a century, from the time the country first began industrializing in the late 1800s. But a combination of public protests and lawsuits, local government action, use of nuclear energy and upgrading of industries and technology helped to turn the tide in the 1970s and '80s. (Kyodo News via AP, File)

The face masks, thick dark haze and pollution warnings plaguing residents of China's capital this week once were a fact of life for people living in Japan's biggest industrial cities.

Japanese suffered from dire pollution problems for nearly a century, from the time the country first began industrializing in the late 1800s. But a combination of public protests and lawsuits, local government action, use of nuclear energy and upgrading of industries and technology helped to turn the tide in the 1970s and '80s.

Some of the key factors that helped Japan's big cleanup could offer hope for China, India and other countries facing severe environmental crisis:

Read more at: Lessons from Japan's progress in cleaning up smog
 
.
The Chinese government has announced new target of cutting pollution from coal-fired power plants by 60 percent by 2020.

By upgrading the plants, China aims for a reduction in raw coal use of around 100 million metric tons, which would help improve its own environment and help contribute to a better world.

During his stay in Paris for the climate talks, Chinese President Xi Jinping reiterated China's commitment to helping in the global struggle to limit the effects of climate change.

China's bid to reduce emissions means a big market for those countries, such as Japan, that are at the cutting edge of energy efficiency and environmental protection.

China and Japan have cooperated in this field for three decades. They launched an annual forum on improving energy efficiency and environmental protection in 2006, at which their officials, researchers and entrepreneurs put their heads together to find areas for cooperation. They signed 26 deals on saving energy and protecting environment on the eve of the Paris climate talks, increasing the number of projects to 259 in nine years.

If China wants to take a leading role in climate change and sustainable energy policy, it would do well to look at the lessons from Japan's experience.

When Japan's economy grew at an annual rate of 10 percent in the 1960s, air pollution in several cities was alarming. Emissions of nitrogen dioxide, carbon monoxide and sulfur dioxide tripled, causing the pollution-related illnesses such as Yokkaichi asthma and Minamata disease (mercury poisoning)-both named after the cities where they first appeared-and cadmium poisoning.

It was the oil crisis in the 1970s that catalyzed the rapid turnaround that allowed Japan to become an "efficiency superpower".

Japan charted a clear course and gave marching orders to its bureaucracy. What followed was a wholesale reorganization of the government's attitude toward energy security and a nationwide effort to reduce energy consumption, and promote better conservation and efficiency. By harnessing the conservation efforts of millions of households and businesses, Japan succeeded in restraining the growth in its energy consumption even as its economy continued to expand throughout the 1980s and 1990s. By most estimates, Japan leads the world today in energy efficiency.

To some extent, Japan has cleaned itself up through a shift to lighter manufacturing and allowing its companies to move much of their energy-intensive primary processing to other countries while concentrating on high-tech products further up the value chain. China can still learn from Japan how to become more energy efficient and how to protect its environment from rapid industrialization.

Japan provided China with loans for several years to put toward important environmental initiatives, such as installing desulfurization and dust collection systems at ironwork, building water supply systems and constructing sewage networks. Japan's support and experience mean a lot to China.

And there is plenty of room for the two countries to strengthen their cooperation in energy saving and environmental protection.

China is thirsty for Japan's advanced environmental technologies, and China remains a big, relatively cheap laboratory for Japanese companies to do research and development.

China frequently sees many of its cities wreathed in choking smog and has to deal with other severe environmental problems, while Japan is still struggling to move out of recession. So this is would be a win-win proposition.

The author is China Daily's Tokyo bureau chief.

Lessons can be learned from Japan's energy efficiency experience[2]- Chinadaily.com.cn

Shokusan Kougyou (industrial promotion) in Meiji Japan did not stop simply at being a government slogan; it was the national goal of both the people and those in civil service. This led to interaction between the dynamic private sector and the public support of industry.

Again, this situation is not unique to the Meiji Period but is a major characteristic throughout Japan’s modern history, including the wartime, postwar and high economic growth periods. Clearly, much capability is required of both the public and private sectors. But if we were to ask which sector contributed more to the country’s economic development, the answer must be the dynamism of the private sector. Schumpeter-type entrepreneurs, who continually carry out innovation as the Japanese ones did, are not to be found everywhere. There are few developing countries today that possess a vibrant private sector, even with the assistance of the government or international organizations in setting the playing field. If Japanese-style industrial policies were implemented in an environment where the market economy
is underdeveloped, all that would be visible is scrambling for official protection rather than a dynamic entrepreneurial response.

Another prominent feature of Japan is that as well as having commerce and service industries that aim at short-term profits, it is successful at launching manufacturing enterprises that call for the cumulative learning of technology and substantial initial investment. This feature, which can consistently be observed from the Meiji Period to the present, is attributed to Japan’s fascination with monotsukuri (making things).

The Chinese government has announced new target of cutting pollution from coal-fired power plants by 60 percent by 2020.

By upgrading the plants, China aims for a reduction in raw coal use of around 100 million metric tons, which would help improve its own environment and help contribute to a better world.

During his stay in Paris for the climate talks, Chinese President Xi Jinping reiterated China's commitment to helping in the global struggle to limit the effects of climate change.

China's bid to reduce emissions means a big market for those countries, such as Japan, that are at the cutting edge of energy efficiency and environmental protection.

China and Japan have cooperated in this field for three decades. They launched an annual forum on improving energy efficiency and environmental protection in 2006, at which their officials, researchers and entrepreneurs put their heads together to find areas for cooperation. They signed 26 deals on saving energy and protecting environment on the eve of the Paris climate talks, increasing the number of projects to 259 in nine years.

If China wants to take a leading role in climate change and sustainable energy policy, it would do well to look at the lessons from Japan's experience.

When Japan's economy grew at an annual rate of 10 percent in the 1960s, air pollution in several cities was alarming. Emissions of nitrogen dioxide, carbon monoxide and sulfur dioxide tripled, causing the pollution-related illnesses such as Yokkaichi asthma and Minamata disease (mercury poisoning)-both named after the cities where they first appeared-and cadmium poisoning.

It was the oil crisis in the 1970s that catalyzed the rapid turnaround that allowed Japan to become an "efficiency superpower".

Japan charted a clear course and gave marching orders to its bureaucracy. What followed was a wholesale reorganization of the government's attitude toward energy security and a nationwide effort to reduce energy consumption, and promote better conservation and efficiency. By harnessing the conservation efforts of millions of households and businesses, Japan succeeded in restraining the growth in its energy consumption even as its economy continued to expand throughout the 1980s and 1990s. By most estimates, Japan leads the world today in energy efficiency.

To some extent, Japan has cleaned itself up through a shift to lighter manufacturing and allowing its companies to move much of their energy-intensive primary processing to other countries while concentrating on high-tech products further up the value chain. China can still learn from Japan how to become more energy efficient and how to protect its environment from rapid industrialization.

Japan provided China with loans for several years to put toward important environmental initiatives, such as installing desulfurization and dust collection systems at ironworks, building water supply systems and constructing sewage networks. Japan's support and experience mean a lot to China.

And there is plenty of room for the two countries to strengthen their cooperation in energy saving and environmental protection.

China is thirsty for Japan's advanced environmental technologies, and China remains a big, relatively cheap laboratory for Japanese companies to do research and development.

China frequently sees many of its cities wreathed in choking smog and has to deal with other severe environmental problems, while Japan is still struggling to move out of recession. So this is would be a win-win proposition.

The author is China Daily's Tokyo bureau chief.

Lessons can be learned from Japan's energy efficiency experience[2]- Chinadaily.com.cn



Below is a list of characteristics that enabled Edo Japan to catch up rapidly with the West in the periods that followed. It is given to my students as a near-consensus view among Japanese economists.

1.Political stability and unity under the Tokugawa administration

2.Agricultural growth (expansion of farmable land in the pre-Edo and early Edo period and rising productivity in the late Edo Period)

3.Establishment of a communications and transportation network and the integration of the national economy

4.Increased commodity production, including a large number of local specialties

5.Development of commerce and finance and the emergence of an affluent merchant class

6.Official promotion of industries, especially at the level of han (local) governments

7. The spread of education through Bakufu and han schools, private academies and terakoya (privateschools for children)

These items may strike Japanese as nothing out of the ordinary. However, we must realize that these conditions are still rare in latecomer countries of today. A few exceptional countries like Taiwan, Korea and Singapore have achieved a high level of industrialization and now fulfill the above seven points. On the other hand, as for transition economies and the poorest countries of today, none of them boast all the conditions that Japan of the late Edo Period enjoyed, and only a few of them can provide even some of them.
 
. .
Shokusan Kougyou (industrial promotion) in Meiji Japan did not stop simply at being a government slogan; it was the national goal of both the people and those in civil service. This led to interaction between the dynamic private sector and the public support of industry.

Again, this situation is not unique to the Meiji Period but is a major characteristic throughout Japan’s modern history, including the wartime, postwar and high economic growth periods. Clearly, much capability is required of both the public and private sectors. But if we were to ask which sector contributed more to the country’s economic development, the answer must be the dynamism of the private sector. Schumpeter-type entrepreneurs, who continually carry out innovation as the Japanese ones did, are not to be found everywhere. There are few developing countries today that possess a vibrant private sector, even with the assistance of the government or international organizations in setting the playing field. If Japanese-style industrial policies were implemented in an environment where the market economy
is underdeveloped, all that would be visible is scrambling for official protection rather than a dynamic entrepreneurial response.

Another prominent feature of Japan is that as well as having commerce and service industries that aim at short-term profits, it is successful at launching manufacturing enterprises that call for the cumulative learning of technology and substantial initial investment. This feature, which can consistently be observed from the Meiji Period to the present, is attributed to Japan’s fascination with monotsukuri (making things).





Below is a list of characteristics that enabled Edo Japan to catch up rapidly with the West in the periods that followed. It is given to my students as a near-consensus view among Japanese economists.

1.Political stability and unity under the Tokugawa administration

2.Agricultural growth (expansion of farmable land in the pre-Edo and early Edo period and rising productivity in the late Edo Period)

3.Establishment of a communications and transportation network and the integration of the national economy

4.Increased commodity production, including a large number of local specialties

5.Development of commerce and finance and the emergence of an affluent merchant class

6.Official promotion of industries, especially at the level of han (local) governments

7. The spread of education through Bakufu and han schools, private academies and terakoya (privateschools for children)

These items may strike Japanese as nothing out of the ordinary. However, we must realize that these conditions are still rare in latecomer countries of today. A few exceptional countries like Taiwan, Korea and Singapore have achieved a high level of industrialization and now fulfill the above seven points. On the other hand, as for transition economies and the poorest countries of today, none of them boast all the conditions that Japan of the late Edo Period enjoyed, and only a few of them can provide even some of them.

I think you are referring to the article JSCh posted since it is the one that mentions the Meiji era. That being said thanks for informing us about the achievements of the Tokugawa period as I am eager to know more about Japanese history. :-)
 
.
I think you are referring to the article JSCh posted since it is the one that mentions the Meiji era. That being said thanks for informing us about the achievements of the Tokugawa period as I am eager to know more about Japanese history. :-)

Japanese Industrial Revolution would be an interesting thread to talk about. Perhaps we can include in its umbrella the paradigm of East Asia's Industrialization, as well.
 
.
I think you are referring to the article JSCh posted since it is the one that mentions the Meiji era. That being said thanks for informing us about the achievements of the Tokugawa period as I am eager to know more about Japanese history. :-)


In fact the collaboration between Japan and China is not just on energy security or environmental planning, but on provincial and prefectorial development. I would encourage you to read some of the works explaining the Japanese active support of development China's Northeast 3 Regions.This paradigm , this reality, continues on to this day. In fact China's number one comprehensive developmental ally is Japan. Despite some minor strategic geopolitical differences; Japan continues to be the largest driver of Chinese national supremacy in regards to national development; from the south of Canton to the deep north of Heilongjiang. To as far west as Xinjiang.

日系企業と中国東北三省との「協力優勢」および協力分野について

中央学院大学社会システム研究所紀要 (中央学院大学社会システム研究所): 2001|書誌詳細|国立国会図書館サーチ
 
.
Japanese Industrial Revolution would be an interesting thread to talk about. Perhaps we can include in its umbrella the paradigm of East Asia's Industrialization, as well.

Do tag me in such a thread,also can you recommend a good documentary on Post war Japan's Industrialization
 
.
That being said thanks for informing us about the achievements of the Tokugawa period

The Bakufu and the Imperial Meiji Administration had one thing in common: Japan's Industrialization. The only difference was in context to how the modernization would be implemented. The Bakufu wanted to implement a gradual industrial process, trying to preserve the traditional roles of the old system , whereas the Meiji Mandate wanted to industrialize Japan quickly and mobilize the entire nation on a grand scheme , through national doctrine.

The Bakufu wanted to preserve the old hereditary mandates and the autonomous regions, trying preserve the ancient ways. This was rather quite similar to the strategy of the Daoguang Emperor of the Qing Dynasty. The latter was a proponent of gradual industrialization ; in fact the Bakufu (Tokugawa Shogunate) was very much similar to the Qing Dynasty in regards to societal considerations of traditional preservation vs westernization and modernization.

Japan's success was linked to the forced abdication of the Bakufu and the restoration of the Emperor to Power. The stark difference in China was that there was no centrifugal force in China that wielded clout to imbue national development. Some would argue for Dr. Sun Yat Sen, however, he was not strong enough, like the Meiji Emperor. Rather, China's industrialization took multiple stages under various political leaders ; Mao's nationalization mandate, then Deng's industrialization mandate.

Do tag me in such a thread,also can you recommend a good documentary on Post war Japan's Industrialization

I can do better; I can write articles. Absence of recent rapport or intellectual discussions here had alluded me to perceive lack of interest in the subject matter. Given the prolific trolling by nuisance factors here. However, I suppose i can devote some time to more progressive and intellectual dictum. Next time i'll tag you. Or do follow me ;)
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom