RAM MANDIR in Ayodhya soon? Supreme Court offers to mediate, seeks urgent hearing next week

[NakedLunch]

Doubts ?

just like Qutubuddin ansari being killed before his photograph was taken ?

you are spot on My friend

I have given way to my normal style to try and have a reasonable discussion. If you are incapable of doing that then why should i bother? You are guests in this forum, act like guests of go find an Indian forum to pollute with your arrogance. Now if you cant have a sensible discussion go find someone else to bait. And dont call me your friend. That is slander.

 

[Eminent Mainstream Media]

Was it ever proven who started that fire?

Yes- Most of them have been convicted some have fled and are in hiding-

 

[Stephen Cohen]

Was it ever proven who started that fire?

That FIRE gave Rise to MODI ; That is The END RESULT

What was the Need to set a train on fire as was done by the Muslim Mob

 

[NakedLunch]

That FIRE gave Rise to MODI ; That is The END RESULT

What was the Need to set a train on fire as was done by the Muslim Mob

If a Muslim mob set fire to that train it was as reprehensible and disgusting an act as the riots that followed. No-one in their right mind would defend mass murder. Would they?

 

[Surya 1]

Good good now i can put more salt on wounds of nationalist indian muslims keep going

Why now? You guys are doing it since 1947. keep doing that. We know how to manage Indian Muslims.

 

[Eminent Mainstream Media]

If a Muslim mob set fire to that train it was as reprehensible and disgusting an act as the riots that followed. No-one in their right mind would defend mass murder. Would they?

Yes riots were totally unjustified- But people get angry and enough PR was spread for political gains- Still Modi did a good job and managed it in 3 days- He ordered firing on Hindus and 250 of them died- Had he not been strict the situation would've been worse- All India rioting was also possible-

 

[Stephen Cohen]

If a Muslim mob set fire to that train it was as reprehensible and disgusting an act as the riots that followed. No-one in their right mind would defend mass murder. Would they?

After 2002 there has been TOTAL PEACE in Gujarat

That Retaliation was Necessary

You cannot burn down 60 Hindus and Not expect Retaliation

 

[Robinhood Pandey]

I have given way to my normal style to try and have a reasonable discussion. If you are incapable of doing that then why should i bother? You are guests in this forum, act like guests of go find an Indian forum to pollute with your arrogance. Now if you cant have a sensible discussion go find someone else to bait. And dont call me your friend. That is slander.

Till the time my country's name is used here in the subforum i ll be here to represent it.

deal with it.

 

[Soumitra]

If a Muslim mob set fire to that train it was as reprehensible and disgusting an act as the riots that followed. No-one in their right mind would defend mass murder. Would they?

Unfortunately there are many who ignore - if not defend the godhra train incident. These are what we call "secular liberals" in India. They create a narrative that Hindus just got up one day and started the riots. They completely miss the starting trigger point.

Mind you I am not defending the riots. What happeded in the riots was also bad. I know becaiuse I was there at the time living in Gujrat

But that does not mean you ignore the trigger point

 

[Surya 1]

why the hell should there be temple at that exact place? build a national monument there, one temple and one mosque one km away, no other compromises.

yes , here you strike. Hindus should not build temple on birth place of their god because the terrorist invadors tried to brak it and construct a mosque. You are real secular.

 

[Eminent Mainstream Media]

why the hell should there be temple at that exact place? build a national monument there, one temple and one mosque one km away, no other compromises.

Yeah make an amusement park so It remains a permanent opportunity for people like Advani and Yogi to rise-

 

[Stephen Cohen]

Unfortunately there are many who ignore - if not defend the godhra train incident. These are what we call "secular liberals" in India. They create a narrative that Hindus just got up one day and started the riots. They completely miss the starting trigger point.

Mind you I am not defending the riots. What happeded in the riots was also bad. I know becaiuse I was there at the time living in Gujrat

But that does not mean you ignore the trigger point

It took the REST of India Twelve Years to finally accept This truth

The Fact that Hindus in rest of India accepted MODI as PM
is proof that Modi was Not responsible for what happened in 2002

 

[NakedLunch]

Till the time my country's name is used here in the subforum i ll be here to represent it.

deal with it.

Seriously? You and your country can go to hell. How about that level of discussion? And I dont have to deal with anything I dont want to. I am not some little muslim boy in your shitty village in India you think you can speak to any way you want. Learn some manners. You have single handedly destroyed a perfectly good thread. Congratulations. I'm out.

 

[Surya 1]

Most important of all is that Kuran forbids making mosque by destructing any other religion shrine. So those Muslims who follows kuran will not oppose. Those who are muslims for the sake of saying muslim and do not have a faith in kuran will oppose and India will have to mange them.

Yes it should be built exactly where he was born. Who are these Muslims to tell you where to build a temple to your deities. This should be done asap.

exactly........

we will. But most importantly, if the hindu leaders reach a historic compromise and build a temple nearby and keep that land neutral, it will have my complete support. I will personally donate 1 lakh for any such temple.

If Muslims agree to vacate all their Mosques which are build by destroying Hindu temples and which are against the directive of Kuran, I will donate my 1540 Sq flats to Muslims for donation and building their mosque.

 

[Guynextdoor2]

Too bad being a congressman has paid off well

If allowed to build temple at that place, it will create huge goodwill for Muslims in India and it will decrease the animosity between two sides.

No

It is like this

When this Ram Temple Dispute was at its peak in 1992
There was a QUESTION that WHAT NEXT

SO the PEOPLE of India and the INDIAN PARLIAMENT made a LAW
and decided that
ALL PLACES of WORSHIP as they EXISTED on 15 AUGUST 1947
will RETAIN their CHARACTER ; everything ELSE was FROZEN as on 15 AUGUST 1947

ONLY ONE PLACE WAS left out
That is this Place in AYODHYA

We dont want the others ; we dont CARE ;

This is a SYMBOLIC dispute

It is about CORRECTING A HISTORICAL WRONG

ONLY One Place is Enough to send the RIGHT MESSAGE

That is why That Babri Masjid was Demolished

To make a strong Point

how about the historical wrong hindus did by creating RSS?