What's new

Rajasthan textbooks have a chapter in which the cow "writes" a letter to students as a "mother"

Status
Not open for further replies.
Insult was necessary?I can make also a reply like that but when it goes personal it means you have run out of matter to debate.
Secularism means free practice for all religions,If pakistan was secular Pig and alcohol would have been legal but because Pakistan is an Islamic republic these things are banned (for muslims only).But A country which made itself on the basis of "democracy" and "secularism" it goes against the very basis of secularism that cow slaughter is a fuking CRIMINAL OFFENCE like wtf India is going beyond the level of Hypocrisy and Intolerance.I could not have put this more nicely,Peace.
ban against cow slaughter is enshrined in our constitution, because our country has a majority of hindus around 82% keeping their sensibilities in mind, the ban of cow and milch cattle article was introduced by constitution makers when India got independence from Brtish.
Secularism of West has a different notion,wherein it means church has no involvement in matters of the state.
Hindu temples never involved in making decisions in state,so secularism by default is enshrined in Hindus.

In a country with a 82% majority,would you try to piss off that majority by saying i will eat this and do that just to offend the majority? then don't expect any quarter or lenience from them when shit hits the fan.

besides its our country our rules and our books,its just a lesson for kids.I don't understand the butthurt from mullahs here.
 
.
I can explain this to you mister doctor but I don't have the time and the crayons needed to explain it you.You are mixing up pork with cow meat it is the best out there believe me try it.

Sometimes i have to.
Nah, I am not mixing anything, I am just clearing your concepts.
You are confusing Islam with a religion which opposes anything related to Hinduism/sanatan dharma, which was actually adopted policies by oppressive mughal to tease the Hindu public which was helpless at that time.
That's why Muslims still think Islam=Anti-hindu.
 
.
I don't think cow meat is better than say Goat, Buffalo etc. May be cheap but very unhealthy


I knew something like this is coming :D:D:D

all heavy weights increase blood pressures & cholistrol but these are only source of heavy protein requirement
 
.
all heavy weights increase blood pressures & cholistrol but these are only source of heavy protein requirement
Not protein(only) but more so fats and cholesterol.
There are better protein sources out there.
Btw just for the sake of scientific argument human foetus is considered to have best quality proteins and other rare nutrients.
This is the reason some tribal Chinese (?) consume them
 
.
ban against cow slaughter is enshrined in our constitution, because our country has a majority of hindus around 82% keeping their sensibilities in mind, the ban of cow and milch cattle article was introduced by constitution makers when India got independence from Brtish.
Secularism of West has a different notion,wherein it means church has no involvement in matters of the state.
Hindu temples never involved in making decisions in state,so secularism by default is enshrined in Hindus.

In a country with a 82% majority,would you try to piss off that majority by saying i will eat this and do that just to offend the majority? then don't expect any quarter or lenience from them when shit hits the fan.

besides its our country our rules and our books,its just a lesson for kids.I don't understand the butthurt from mullahs here.
Jinnah was right all along.2 nation one which eats meat and the other doesn't :D.
 
.
So do you consider India your "Mother Land" ? :coffee: ....... do you say "Bharat Mata ki Jai" ?

We are all curious to know if you are stupendously stupid to call some "land" as your mother.
WE ehh............,where is this 'we' you are talking about??Where are the others,I do not see anyone except a sad little sole!!Trust me when I say this kiddo,there is no 'we' in this one,and there never will be,there is only you,the sad little prick you are,trying to hide behind a non-existent 'group of people',how typical of your kind! :D
But still,for the record,let me tell you this, young chap - I do not!!I do not consider India to be my mather or father or chacha or bua or fufa or khala or anything!!To me,it's my country,my nation state and I will just leave it at that.(And to be honest,I can't even remember when was the last time I even spouted the word "Bharat'!!)The only one PERSON I would ever give the place of my MOTHER,is and will always be my biological mother,the woman who gave birth to me,is that clear??Think I'm a traitor,go ahead and sue me,who gives a **** anyway??

Or does this Rabid hate and abhorrence extend only to Cows.
Hate??Where do you see hate in any of my comments??Comprehension problem is it??Making a mockery of something (or that of some absurdly stupid practice as in this case) needs not be out of sheer hatred!!On the contrary,it might very well have been originated out of sheer amusement,have you ever given a thought to that possibility??But of course not,why would you??You guys or your actions can never be wrong and should always be above and beyond any questions,doubts or mockery,at least in your own minds that is!!
And to answer your question,lest you should be thinking that I had been dodging it,yeah,this so called 'Rabid hate and abhorrence' as you put it (which really is just a show of mockery,but lets forget it for now) extend only to the relation between the cows and the so called chaddis (term not invented by this poor soul by the way).................for the time being at least.Why??Because simply put,I'm not really aware of any other group of people placing a dumb fucking animal at the place of their Mother (or Father).You find me one,I will happily mock them as well.You know what,while we are at it,I can actually bring others,a lot many others to bring to party so that they might have some fun as well!!Capiche??
There is no reason to DODGE this question is there ? Give us a clear crisp reply to put these sanghis in their place.
Who's been DODGING??Me??Nahh.(and again,there ain't no 'US' in there chuvak,just you!!)All I was doing was just showing you the mirror,to show you how much of a presumptuous man you sounded when you asked such a stupid question (the Bharat mata and British father analogy was all fucked up by the way,thanks to your incompetence,but we'll come to that later may be).I just did it with asking you a counter question,or rather tried to do,since quite obviously,it went over your head.Satisfied now??

PS - By the way,as I see it,considering a country as someone's mom (or dad,take your pick) would be somewhat valid in the sense that that person is born and raised on it,grows up by taking in its resources as to sustain oneself before eventually being absorbed and then recycled (I mean death)!!So yeah,it would make sense,a lot of sense...............but calling a cow (or any other animal for that mother) your mother (or father or any other relative)!!What's the logic in that??!!If there is any,at least I do not see it.
 
Last edited:
.
Nah, I am not mixing anything, I am just clearing your concepts.
You are confusing Islam with a religion which opposes anything related to Hinduism/sanatan dharma, which was actually adopted policies by oppressive mughal to tease the Hindu public which was helpless at that time.
That's why Muslims still think Islam=Anti-hindu.

This is a general misconception.

Cow Slaughter was BANNED during most of the mughal rule. The first Mughal emperor, Babur, banned cow slaughter in 1527 and it continued every since. Most muslims did not partake in cow slaughter or eating beef back then.

It was the BRITISH who started the First Cow slaughter and consumption in 1750. The Muslim community was encouraged to take up the slaughter of cattle (since no one else would do it), as the large number slaughterhouses set up by the British required professional butchers, but a majority of the immigrant Muslims, as well as the converted, seldom did take to eating of cow flesh.

This is borne out by many clippings from the Urdu press as well as from the correspondence between British officials of that period.

It was Queen Victoria who broadcasted the truth about widespread cow-killing in India, by the British, in her letter dated December 8, 1893, to Indian Viceroy Lansdowne.

She says "Though the Muhammadans' cow-killing is made the pretext for the agitation, it is in fact, directed against us, who kill far more cows for our army, than the Muhammadans".


In fact the anti-kine killing movement from about 1880-1894 was actually against the cow-killing to supply daily beef to the over 1,00,000 British soldiers and officers/civilians in India.
 
.
This is a general misconception.

Cow Slaughter was BANNED during most of the mughal rule. The first Mughal emperor, Babur, banned cow slaughter in 1527 and it continued every since. Most muslims did not partake in cow slaughter or eating beef back then.

It was the BRITISH who started the First Cow slaughter and consumption in 1750. The Muslim community was encouraged to take up the slaughter of cattle (since no one else would do it), as the large number slaughterhouses set up by the British required professional butchers, but a majority of the immigrant Muslims, as well as the converted, seldom did take to eating of cow flesh.

This is borne out by many clippings from the Urdu press as well as from the correspondence between British officials of that period.

It was Queen Victoria who broadcasted the truth about widespread cow-killing in India, by the British, in her letter dated December 8, 1893, to Indian Viceroy Lansdowne.

She says "Though the Muhammadans' cow-killing is made the pretext for the agitation, it is in fact, directed against us, who kill far more cows for our army, than the Muhammadans".


In fact the anti-kine killing movement from about 1880-1894 was actually against the cow-killing to supply daily beef to the over 1,00,000 British soldiers and officers/civilians in India.
Oh, is it true??
I think you are correct babur(respect) banned cow slaughter

So what happened after independence, why Muslims still provoke Hindus by cow Slaughtering when Muslims rulers banned this

Jinnah was right all along.2 nation one which eats meat and the other doesn't :D.
But but it was India who inherited legacy of (and thus respected the will of) Mughal emperors :D:D:D by banning cow slaughter :D
 
.
Jinnah was right all along.2 nation one which eats meat and the other doesn't :D.
Right he was.Who would want to live with a lot who blows up crowded market places and practically slaughters each and every one who doesn't adhere to their version of the 'divine truth' every now and then??!!
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom