What's new

Rafale Flown By Indian And French Air Force Chief Together Rajasthan

Attaboy!

SSP rules, OK!

No, this is no laughing matter. Jf-17 is the highest benchmark in aerospace industry. I remember a very insightful post by a Pakistani member suggesting that in the future, JF-17 might also be used to put up heavy satellites in space, far heavier than what can be accomplished by primitve Indian PSLV and GSLV. JF-17 is good for multiple roles, not just fighting.

I have information from usually reliable sources that they are planning to use it as drones as well.
 
India is going to buy nex version of rafale.

Can anybody say that which aircraft put up better performance MKI or rafale?
 
India is going to buy nex version of rafale.

Can anybody say that which aircraft put up better performance MKI or rafale?

Do not read much into any comparative reports you might find about this exercise. The French are notorious for using exercises like this to gather electronic intelligence, especially about the radar and the EW systems.

During the previous Indian participation in Red Flag, the French had sent the Rafale instead of the planned Mirage jets on learning that we were sending the MKI. During the course of the exercises, the French fighters had consistently attempted to gather EM-emission data of the MKIs.

I'll put my money on the IAF keeping their radar strictly in training mode, with the EW systems and jammers kept out of the test altogether.
 
Hi,

What's up with those short shorts the french airmen are wearing---so so Gay
so.. true..and that too in camo..lol..and in one of the pictures, they pose with their arms crossed in the background, like bouncers in front of a club..hahaha
 
@sandy_3126
@AUSTERLITZ
So one Pakistani member makes a comment on Rafel (Not even an Indian product) and he gets 2 negatives while the Indian pack is let lose to divulge all nonsense at will. With these Indian standards, no wonder PDF is reaching new heights. !!

@WebMaster @Aeronaut


 
@sandy_3126
@AUSTERLITZ
So one Pakistani member makes a comment on Rafel (Not even an Indian product) and he gets 2 negatives while the Indian pack is let lose to divulge all nonsense at will. With these Indian standards, no wonder PDF is reaching new heights. !!

@WebMaster @Aeronaut


Not really. It was not because of saying something bad about rafael. It seems to be for bringing a reference to JF 17 into an unrelated thread with an intent to derail. Do not blame others for your own shortcomings mate. That's just lame
 
So one Pakistani member makes a comment on Rafel (Not even an Indian product) and he gets 2 negatives while the Indian pack is let lose to divulge all nonsense at will. With these Indian standards, no wonder PDF is reaching new heights. !!

Chill dude,I don't see any problem here.
 
Not really. It was not because of saying something bad about rafael. It seems to be for bringing a reference to JF 17 into an unrelated thread with an intent to derail. Do not blame others for your own shortcomings mate. That's just lame
How is it so called OUR shortcomings..... more a case of double jeopardy. !!
 

same guy, same thread, page 21..

The whole rocket weighs 414,000kgs but
it can only only carry 2 tonnes. LOLOL
In any case, JF-17 can perform anti-
satellite role as well, don't forget that. In
a war, all your satellites are juicy targets
for the Thunder! All your
communications and spy sats will be
knocked out by the JF-17 the moment
war starts. So there is no advantage to
India from these satellites in case of
war.
 
Few years of development, and Rafael might just catch upto JF-17 block I.

:lol:

And this is based on what?

@sandy_3126
@AUSTERLITZ
So one Pakistani member makes a comment on Rafel (Not even an Indian product) and he gets 2 negatives while the Indian pack is let lose to divulge all nonsense at will. With these Indian standards, no wonder PDF is reaching new heights. !!

@WebMaster @Aeronaut



Stop crying,

its not about being an Indian product or not. The mere fact that he makes such ridiculous statements without even providing a single piece of source is reason enough for the response and the ratings he got
 
Back
Top Bottom