Quaid e Azam 11 august speech

[ghauri05]

Quaid e Azam made it clear in his last speech at the state bank of Pakistan about what he envisioned.

@SecularNationalist this is the last speech by Quaid..and all he is talking about is islamic system...but i believe hearing to it you will become deaf.

 

[Indus Pakistan]

@SecularNationalist

[1] Did Jinnah agree to the Cabinet Mission Plan of 16th May 1946?
[2] What conclusions can you make from this?

 

[SecularNationalist]

@SecularNationalist this is the last speech by Quaid..and all he is talking about is islamic system...but i believe hearing to it you will become deaf.

Lol the video was made and posted by brass tracks a propaganda organization owned and controlled by zahid Hamid.That lying lal topi joker has no honor and even if Jinnah said all that really that does not prove he was not separating religion from the state.He was just talking in favor of Islamic systems because of Muslim politics of that time.He never wanted to impose religion and never wanted the Pakistan we have today. They were just siyasi speeches .If you look at his life he was not Islamic at all.

 

[El Sidd]

Lol the video was made and posted by brass tracks a propaganda organization owned and controlled by zahid Hamid.That lying lal topi joker has no honor and even if Jinnah said all that really that does not prove he was not separating religion from the state.He was just talking in favor of Islamic systems because of Muslim politics of that time.He never wanted to impose religion and never wanted the Pakistan we have today. They were just siyasi speeches .If you look at his life he was not Islamic at all.

Aap bhi fatwe dete hain?

 

[ghauri05]

Lol the video was made and posted by brass tracks a propaganda organization owned and controlled by zahid Hamid.That lying lal topi joker has no honor and even if Jinnah said all that really that does not prove he was not separating religion from the state.He was just talking in favor of Islamic systems because of Muslim politics of that time.He never wanted to impose religion and never wanted the Pakistan we have today. They were just siyasi speeches .If you look at his life he was not Islamic at all.

hahaha.....u liberals are funny creature ...when u can't find any logic..u simply label other person..conservative..maddrasa culture..joker propaganda etc.

he is talking about basing the whole economic system on islamic rules and he has clearly denounce the western system( i suppose you became deaf during that part of his speech) ..that it has failed to provide any solution to man's financial problem..still u think it's a political statement..

If that is your stance..then it can also be said about his statement on 11th August that it was a political statement..can't it???there are numerous statements about how Pak should thrive on islamic principles...and only 1 line..which says state has nothing to do with religion(n even this statement was given regarding rights of minorities..which Islam also allows)
So, even if we consider your point that he wanted to separate religion from state... what do u think can be political stance of one person ...a stance which he has reiterated many times or a single line he uttered once in his life.

 

[SecularNationalist]

hahaha.....u liberals are funny creature ...when u can't find any logic..u simply label other person..conservative..maddrasa culture..joker propaganda etc.

he is talking about basing the whole economic system on islamic rules and he has clearly denounce the western system( i suppose you became deaf during that part of his speech) ..that it has failed to provide any solution to man's financial problem..still u think it's a political statement..

If that is your stance..then it can also be said about his statement on 11th August that it was a political statement..can't it???there are numerous statements about how Pak should thrive on islamic principles...and only 1 line..which says state has nothing to do with religion(n even this statement was given regarding rights of minorities..which Islam also allows)
So, even if we consider your point that he wanted to separate religion from state... what do u think can be political stance of one person ...a stance which he has reiterated many times or a single line he uttered once in his life.

There are several quotes of him advocating secularism not just one you are referring to.Check my recent posts can't post them again.
Your whole argument is based on the video you posted which was created by a man known by everyone but respected by no one. Even the right wing majority do not even listen to that zahid Hamid joker. He is jailed several times for distorting facts and misguiding the masses.
You are arguing on your presented evidence but silent on Jinnah's several quotes on secularism. Now you will say I made them by myself.
Regarding your previous post I do agree problems are everywhere even in the west but at least they are free from religious violence and are full of nationalism ,their country comes first and religion comes after.With nationalism comes a sincerity with your country and people.Here people are defenders of a religion rather than national interests. The result is lack of motive and development of a nation.
They have big economies, big GDP and good living standards so they are ofcourse better overall.
Secular societies are no doubt the best societies.
Accept your failures and try to correct them or keep blabbing like a duck,the choice is yours.