Q&A Session In Birmingham By Sheikh Imran Hosein

[Azadkashmir]

 

[Indus Pakistan]

Please don't let anybody get inbetween you and the almighty. There is a reason why we don't have professional clergy in Islam.


This is you ----------------------------------------> This is Allah

 

[TMA]

Did you attend?

 

[Azadkashmir]

Did you attend?

I didn't even know and how can i go with bad health.

 

[BHarwana]

this is his latest.

 

[TMA]

I didn't even know and how can i go with bad health.

Just asking, since I did go and meet him. I though maybe I met you unknowingly...

 

[Menace2Society]

This man is anti Pakistani, be careful of disinformation.

 

[TMA]

This man is anti Pakistani, be careful of disinformation.

No. He is anti corrupt politicians and other officials who consistently betray the Pakistani people and have their Qiblah towards Washington. There is a difference.

 

[Qutb-ud-din Aybak]

he is anti Pakistan and think that Pakistan army is slave of non Muslims.

 

[Menace2Society]

No. He is anti corrupt politicians and other officials who consistently betray the Pakistani people and have their Qiblah towards Washington. There is a difference.

In 2005-2007 in his sermons called for Taliban to take control of Pakistan. He called Pakistan army kaffirs, He is anti Pakistani disinformation f**king cockroach. He has misled many.

 

[TMA]

In 2005-2007 in his sermons called for Taliban to take control of Pakistan. He called Pakistan army kaffirs, He is anti Pakistani disinformation f**king cockroach. He has misled many.

Let us for the sake of argument agree he is anti-Pakistani. Does this mean his research into Dajjal and Eschatology et al is by definition incorrect? Does it mean that his work on Gog and Magog is incorrect? Does it mean that his work on money is wrong? Does it mean we ought to through the baby out with the bath water?

he is anti Pakistan and think that Pakistan army is slave of non Muslims.

Well Pakistan did become an "non NATO ally" in the war on Afghanistan. Perhaps he should have described Pakistan army as a rent army rather than a slave as Pakistan gets reimbursed for the supply lines?

 

[Menace2Society]

Let us for the sake of argument agree he is anti-Pakistani. Does this mean his research into Dajjal and Eschatology et al is by definition incorrect? Does it mean that his work on Gog and Magog is incorrect? Does it mean that his work on money is wrong? Does it mean we ought to through the baby out with the bath water?


Well Pakistan did become an "non NATO ally" in the war on Afghanistan. Perhaps he should have described Pakistan army as a rent army rather than a slave as Pakistan gets reimbursed for the supply lines?

It means he cannot be trusted.

I don't care what Pakistan army has done, they protect a Muslim land while this cockroach sheikh lives in a non muslim land. He is no one to preach and certainly was on payroll of enemy to talk against the army.

 

[rohailmalhi]

Yep he never criticized Saudi Arabia for that matter.

 

[TMA]

Yep he never criticized Saudi Arabia for that matter.

What?! Have you listened to his talks or read his books?

It means he cannot be trusted.

I don't care what Pakistan army has done, they protect a Muslim land while this cockroach sheikh lives in a non muslim land. He is no one to preach and certainly was on payroll of enemy to talk against the army.

You are responding based upon emotion.
This is typical for my compatriots.

What you need to do is critically analyse and dissect his works. Not say" I don't care "as long as Pak army is protecting Pakistan or resort to ad hominems.

 

[Ahmet Pasha]

This dude is not a reliable source. He turns on a dime and goes back on some of his claims. He sometimes also uses not so credible ahadis.

I used to follow him quite a bit. But I didnt him to be very trustworthy.