Sanghis get run out of Birmingham by single Pakistani

[SabzShaheen]

"IICSA found that a lack of data made it impossible to say if some ethnic groups are disproportionately more likely to be perpetrators or victims, and that “it is unclear whether a misplaced sense of political correctness or the sheer complexity of the problem have inhibited good-quality data collection”."

Grooming gangs sexually abusing children in ‘most degrading and destructive ways’

Inquiry identifies ‘extensive failures’ by councils and police, leaving victims treated as offenders while perpetrators go free

www.independent.co.uk

Like I said, the British sacrificed their daughters at the altar of political correctness, there's nothing the British can ever do. Probably we'll see some last spurts when Xtianity/Monarchy gets challenged directly, apart from that Britons are a spent population. Declining and decaying from within.

Analysis: A new Home Office report admits grooming gangs are not a ‘Muslim problem'

The study finds no credible evidence for a far-right stereotype that has spread widely in the media, writes Dr Ella Cockbain (UCL Security & Crime Science) in an article co-authored with Dr Waqas Tufail for The Guardian.

www.ucl.ac.uk

Bharat Mata ki (pa)Jeet!

We British should have never let in RSS Extremists into Leicester. Only civilised peoples with respect for our established inter-faith relations are welcome.

The only ones decaying from within are “muh duodecillion year old dharmic chameleon culture” that can assimilate into their colonial patron’s traditions

 

[Cheepek]

Analysis: A new Home Office report admits grooming gangs are not a ‘Muslim problem'

The study finds no credible evidence for a far-right stereotype that has spread widely in the media, writes Dr Ella Cockbain (UCL Security & Crime Science) in an article co-authored with Dr Waqas Tufail for The Guardian.

www.ucl.ac.uk

Bharat Mata ki (pa)Jeet!

We British should have never let in RSS Extremists into Leicester. Only civilised peoples with respect for our established inter-faith relations are welcome.

The only ones decaying from within are “muh duodecillion year old dharmic chameleon culture” that can assimilate into their colonial patron’s traditions

Digging into the report’s section on the ethnicity of offenders one learns that an official data collection exercise in 2011 involving police forces and other agencies found that of 2,300 possible offenders there was no basic information held about 1,100. Among the remaining 1,200, ethnicity data was not known for 38 per cent. Of the remaining suspects – approximately 750 by my arithmetic – ‘30 per cent of offenders were White, while 28 per cent were Asian’. This presumably is the finding used to justify ‘most commonly White’ – but which seems to miss the obvious point that the white population of England and Wales is around 80 per cent overall.

A second smaller study from 2013 mentioned in the report found that of 306 offenders looked at, 75 per cent were Asian, which actually amounts to a ten-fold over-representation, though the report does not point this out.

The Home Office’s grooming report is an exercise in obfuscation

That the Home Office compiled a report on the political hot potato of child grooming gangs and then actually published it represents progress of a sort. Were you especially charitably disposed towards the department, you could call to mind Dr Johnson talking about the feat of a dog walking on...

www.spectator.co.uk

 

[-blitzkrieg-]

I guess they got scared because *ab ye phatega*

Fatteyga..not phattay ga.

 

[SabzShaheen]

Digging into the report’s section on the ethnicity of offenders one learns that an official data collection exercise in 2011 involving police forces and other agencies found that of 2,300 possible offenders there was no basic information held about 1,100. Among the remaining 1,200, ethnicity data was not known for 38 per cent. Of the remaining suspects – approximately 750 by my arithmetic – ‘30 per cent of offenders were White, while 28 per cent were Asian’. This presumably is the finding used to justify ‘most commonly White’ – but which seems to miss the obvious point that the white population of England and Wales is around 80 per cent overall.

A second smaller study from 2013 mentioned in the report found that of 306 offenders looked at, 75 per cent were Asian, which actually amounts to a ten-fold over-representation, though the report does not point this out.

The Home Office’s grooming report is an exercise in obfuscation

That the Home Office compiled a report on the political hot potato of child grooming gangs and then actually published it represents progress of a sort. Were you especially charitably disposed towards the department, you could call to mind Dr Johnson talking about the feat of a dog walking on...

www.spectator.co.uk

Author Patrick O’Flynn “mentions linguistic sleight of hand – not ‘usually’ but ‘most commonly’.” Can you explain what this means because I surely can’t. “Usually” would refer to frequency within a time period whilst “commonly” refers to frequency within a data set. Whilst interchangeable, the latter is more appropriate for use in the Home Office report being examined.

Assuming the “second smaller study” is that of the NCA CEOP, the researchers said their sample size was too small.

And here’s another high-quality piece by this author which give us a taster of what he’s really about.

Regardless, Pakistanis are likely over-represented in grooming related convictions. Does it have anything to do with their economic background? Definitely. Something inherent about their cultural background? Possibly. Anything to do with Islam? Why not learn about it yourself, might help you devise better strategies for ghar waapsi!

 

[lastofthepatriots]

He right. Modi kutta

 

[TheSolution]

British authorities should deport them (both the Indian and Pakistani protestors). See the reactions on their faces once they know they will be kicked out and sent back to their beloved countries, LOL.

Freedom of speech.exe has failed

 

[Cheepek]

Author Patrick O’Flynn “mentions linguistic sleight of hand – not ‘usually’ but ‘most commonly’.” Can you explain what this means because I surely can’t. “Usually” would refer to frequency within a time period whilst “commonly” refers to frequency within a data set. Whilst interchangeable, the latter is more appropriate for use in the Home Office report being examined.

Assuming the “second smaller study” is that of the NCA CEOP, the researchers said their sample size was too small.

And here’s another high-quality piece by this author which give us a taster of what he’s really about.

Regardless, Pakistanis are likely over-represented in grooming related convictions. Does it have anything to do with their economic background? Definitely. Something inherent about their cultural background? Possibly. Anything to do with Islam? Why not learn about it yourself, might help you devise better strategies for ghar waapsi!

30% white, 28% Asian perpetrators in a small sanitised sample of 750 perpetrators from areas that are 80% white.
Only a fraud or numerically illiterate would claim that the perpetrators are "most commonly" white just because there's a 2% difference while completely skirting overall demographics!
Definitely done out of malice, no one can be that stupid.

The study I linked before (scroll up) from 2022 clearly identifies the problem-

"IICSA found that a lack of data made it impossible to say if some ethnic groups are disproportionately more likely to be perpetrators or victims, and that “it is unclear whether a misplaced sense of political correctness or the sheer complexity of the problem have inhibited good-quality data collection”.

The report said that poor data collection also “makes it impossible to know whether any particular ethnic group is overrepresented as perpetrators of child sexual exploitation by networks”.

“Many of the high-profile child sexual exploitation prosecutions have involved groups of men from minority ethnic communities,” the report added."

I have nothing to do with X/Y/Z author.
& really not interested in the reasons of why some do what they do. It is for the British to protect their kids from harm, and they don't seem much interested in it.

 

[INDIAPOSITIVE]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1621271672497078277