Profiling Nasr and Prahar Missile Systems.

[Kompromat]

 

[Kompromat]

 

[Kompromat]

 

[Kompromat]

 

[Kompromat]

 

[Kompromat]

 

[gslv mk3]

Well prahar was developed was developed based on AAD interceptor,so claiming it would take 7 years like prithvi developed back in the '80s is utter BS.And the author makes Multi-Barrel capability as something unattainable to India,even when India have several multi-barrel systems in service (even Shaurya is ).

Multi-Barrel prahaar

Indian BMD has nothing to do with US,and uses heavily modified versions of Israeli greenpine Radars.And the claim BMD capability ,because we haven't changed our NFU doctrine,even with changes in our political system ,and BMD capability is essential to defend India from first strike.

Can any one explain what does this mean ?

 

[Contrarian]

Zero credibility of the article.

It claims:
1. Weapon purchases by India destabilize the region. Weapon acquisition by Pakistan stabilizes the region.
2. Economic growth of India destabilizes the region. Economic growth of Pakistan stabilizes the region.
3. West should help Pakistan in bettering the economy because Pakistani's see no economic help to Pakistan as a destabilizing factor.

Basically India bad, Pakistan good. West must support Pakistan for 'balance'. What a bunch of baloney.

 

[illusion8]

Zero credibility of the article.

It claims:
1. Weapon purchases by India destabilize the region. Weapon acquisition by Pakistan stabilizes the region.
2. Economic growth of India destabilizes the region. Economic growth of Pakistan stabilizes the region.
3. West should help Pakistan in bettering the economy because Pakistani's see no help as a destabilizing factor.

Basically India bad, Pakistan good. West must support Pakistan for 'balance'. What a bunch of baloney.

That's rhetoric for a security state that wants to project itself as a counter to another. Build us up with weapons and money so that we can serve you better kind of thingy and can be a counter weight to the local hegemon to balance your global aspirations.

The anti Soviet team player rhetoric having expired, Now two narratives have come up - one being a counter to India to showcase itself to China, and one being a nuclear wielding Muslim military state to serve the ummah.

 

[Contrarian]

That's rhetoric for a security state that wants to project itself as a counter to another. Build us up with weapons and money so that we can serve you better kind of thingy and can be a counter weight to the local hegemon to balance your global aspirations.

Not that exactly. Article states that you are helping India to counter China and that is bad bad bad for regional stability.
Now you must do course correction and help Pakistan because helping Pakistan is great for regional stability and wise choice.

Not just that, I don't understand why Pakistani's assume that US has helped our economy. Heck US does not give us aid, our economy is driven by the private sector, US has helped India as much as US has helped China in building their economy.

Maybe their intrinsic assumption that we just can not be better than them, so obviously we must be getting 'help'.

 

[illusion8]

Not that exactly. Article states that you are helping India to counter China and that is bad bad bad for regional stability.
Now you must do course correction and help Pakistan because helping Pakistan is great for regional stability and wise choice.

Not just that, I don't understand why Pakistani's assume that US has helped our economy. Heck US does not give us aid, our economy is driven by the private sector, US has helped India as much as US has helped China in building their economy.

Maybe their intrinsic assumption that we just can not be better than them, so obviously we must be getting 'help'.

It feels left out in the Indo US or Indo Afg equation, US being it's biggest benefactor all these years is closing shop literally which effectively means closing down of all those military aid, plus I guess Pakistan realized that China is not that giving like the US.

 

[Rajput_Pakistani]

It feels left out in the Indo US or Indo Afg equation, US being it's biggest benefactor all these years is closing shop literally which effectively means closing down of all those military aid, plus I guess Pakistan realized that China is not that giving like the US.

Yes our bread and butter is USA. It soon going to end, we will be doomed..

Happy now??

Zero credibility of the article.

It claims:
1. Weapon purchases by India destabilize the region. Weapon acquisition by Pakistan stabilizes the region.
2. Economic growth of India destabilizes the region. Economic growth of Pakistan stabilizes the region.
3. West should help Pakistan in bettering the economy because Pakistani's see no economic help to Pakistan as a destabilizing factor.

Basically India bad, Pakistan good. West must support Pakistan for 'balance'. What a bunch of baloney.

A classic example of India as a destabilizing factor in South Asia is the introduction of Nuclear weapons. You are responsible for the nuclear arms race in the region. Its due to Pakistan tit for tat answer in 1998, that even after 16 years there is no war. Although Indian urge is so strong to attack Pakistan the only factor prevent them is Nuclear Pakistan.
This is called Stabilization factor.

Dont they teach comprehension in Indian schools? Its a serious problem here in Indian members.

 

[acetophenol]

Yes our bread and butter is USA. It soon going to end, we will be doomed..

Happy now??



A classic example of India as a destabilizing factor in South Asia is the introduction of Nuclear weapons. You are responsible for the nuclear arms race in the region. Its due to Pakistan tit for tat answer in 1998, that even after 16 years there is no war. Although Indian urge is so strong to attack Pakistan the only factor prevent them is Nuclear Pakistan.
This is called Stabilization factor.

Dont they teach comprehension in Indian schools? Its a serious problem here in Indian members.

India developed nuclear weapons because we had the money and expertise. If any country felt like countering it,its their problem. If Pakistan ate grass and built nukes,its Pakistan's choice and Pakistan's problem. India also has a better automobile,pharmacutical,infrastructure,healthcare,industrial and space capabilities,why no 'tit-for-tat' for that?

 

[Capt.Popeye]

Zero credibility of the article.

It claims:
1. Weapon purchases by India destabilize the region. Weapon acquisition by Pakistan stabilizes the region.
2. Economic growth of India destabilizes the region. Economic growth of Pakistan stabilizes the region.
3. West should help Pakistan in bettering the economy because Pakistani's see no economic help to Pakistan as a destabilizing factor.

Basically India bad, Pakistan good. West must support Pakistan for 'balance'. What a bunch of baloney.

That loooong (and rather windy) story which forms the basis of this thread is based on a simply FALLACIOUS IDEA. That the Prahaar system is Nuclear Tipped. The writer cannot comprehend the difference between "Nuclear Capable" and "Nuclear Armed" !!!
And people even overlook the fact that the Prahaar was exhibited in South Korea and is being considered for export to other countries viz. Viet Nam. Are Nuclear Armed Missiles offered for Export ?!

Zahir Kazmi needs to READ some more about India's Strategic Doctrines; before taking it upon himself to attempt to write stuff like this.
The Indian Strategic Estt. does not hold any great belief in "Tactical Nukes" unlike some "Khakis" who hold a great belief in such weaponry; bordering on religious fervor!

Nuclear Weapons are Weapons of "Dubious Value" at best; and of them, Tactical Nukes are of the most Dubious Value. Most of the Sane World has already recognised that fact: now the ISIS phenomenon and Ukraine's MH17 episode will again drive home the associated risks associated with Tactical Nukes that are latent.

 

[Echo_419]

Zero credibility of the article.

It claims:
1. Weapon purchases by India destabilize the region. Weapon acquisition by Pakistan stabilizes the region.
2. Economic growth of India destabilizes the region. Economic growth of Pakistan stabilizes the region.
3. West should help Pakistan in bettering the economy because Pakistani's see no economic help to Pakistan as a destabilizing factor.

Basically India bad, Pakistan good. West must support Pakistan for 'balance'. What a bunch of baloney.

India Bad
Pakistan good is all i could read in the 'study'

Well prahar was developed was developed based on AAD interceptor,so claiming it would take 7 years like prithvi developed back in the '80s is utter BS.And the author makes Multi-Barrel capability as something unattainable to India,even when India have several multi-barrel systems in service (even Shaurya is ).

Multi-Barrel prahaar

Indian BMD has nothing to do with US,and uses heavily modified versions of Israeli greenpine Radars.And the claim BMD capability ,because we haven't changed our NFU doctrine,even with changes in our political system ,and BMD capability is essential to defend India from first strike.

View attachment 39469

Can any one explain what does this mean ?

View attachment 39470

They are unable to digest the fact that how far we are ahead in the field of rocketry
7 years to develop & even more to deploy
what a load of baloney is this