What's new

‘Professional CEO can run Pakistan Steel efficiently’

Dawood Ibrahim

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
May 25, 2016
Messages
3,475
Reaction score
3
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
ISLAMABAD: The government is likely to incur a financial loss of around Rs10 billion for divestment of Pakistan Steel Mills (PSM), National Assembly’s Standing Committee on Industries and Production was informed on Wednesday.

The committee witnessed serious debate between members and officials over the uncertain future of the mill.

The committee, chaired by Asad Umar of PTI, expressed concern over the daily losses incurred by the PSM. Many members opined that if the government could not make the mill operational and financially viable, then it should privatise or sell it.

Government to incur Rs10bn loss if it privatises the mill
They noted that the mill suffered provisional losses of Rs4.09bn during the first quarter of 2016-17, while its accumulated losses up to Sept 30, 2016 were Rs167.315bn.

Its total liabilities up to Sept 30, 2016 stood at Rs177.77bn.

Most of the committee members were of the view that the mill was incurring huge financial losses and the government should privatise it as early as possible on ‘as is, where is’ basis.

However, PTI’s Asad Umar and Sajida Begum were not in favour of privatisation, arguing that the plant can be run efficiently if a professional CEO is appointed.

Mr Umar proposed the name of Zaigham Adil Rizvi, former CEO of Tuwairqi Steel Mills Limited (TSML), and sarcastically proposed Hussain Sharif as Chairman of the PSM Board.

Qaiser Ahmad Sheikh of the PML-N and Chairman Privatisation Commission Muhammad Zubair argued with each other on PSM’s present status.

Mr Sheikh sarcastically said that three years ago Muhammad Zubair had announced that the government would privatise the entity after making it fully functional.

Mr Zubair clarified that he had meant to say that the government would get a better price for the mill if it was made fully functional.

Mr Umar and Mr Zubair also argued over the strategy to deal with PSM as both had markedly different viewpoints on privatisation.

Mr Umar argued that the government deliberately took the PSM to this state so that people should say “get rid of it”.

Briefing the Standing Committee, Mr Zubair said the Cabinet Committee on Privatisation (CCoP) is scheduled to meet on Jan 18 to consider the sale of PSM as two potential buyers are willing to acquire the unit at a very long term lease.

However, his briefing was interrupted by the committee members and he was asked to share details of the new structure under which the PSM would be disposed of.

However, the committee was not given any details, which irritated Mr Asad Umar who levelled corruption charges on the PSM management.

“There is ongoing corruption in PSM and the union is involved in it too,” he alleged.

However, the officials of the PSM confronted him and the MNAs were asked to forward even a single example of corruption.

Mr Umar directed the PSM management to review the cases of 15 employees who have been served show-cause notice for pelting stones at the PSM building and smashing glass.

He also took up the issue of payments to pensioners and was told that the government is likely to approve three months (up to Dec 2016) salaries of employees.

Meanwhile Mr Zubair informed the committee that a lease-based transaction structure has been prepared for PSM.

“One potential party is an Iranian steel company and their team recently visited Pakistan to assess the worth of the entity and the second party is a Chinese company along with a local concern,” he said. “The new buyers would be given hire and fire powers,” he added.

Mr Zubair said the new dispose of structure of PSM will be considered by the Privatisation Board on Jan 16 after which it would be tabled before the CCoP on Jan 18. If the committee gives the go- ahead, then PC will invite Expressions of Interest (EoIs) and this process would take 45 days.

He said the present government inherited PSM with an accumulated liability of approximately Rs120bn and capacity utilisation of almost zero per cent in 2013.

PSM had been given approximately Rs50bn in the form of bailout packages between the years 2008-2013.

Members who attended the meeting included Sardar Mansab Ali Dogar, Qaiser Ahmad Sheikh, Sahibzada Muhammad Nazeer Sultan, Dr Shezra Mansab Ali Khan Kharal, Syed Imran Ahmad Shah, Ms. Sajida Begum, Iftikhar-ud-Din, Chaudhry Riaz-ul-Haq, Rana Muhammad Qasim Noon, Maulana Muhammad Gohar Shah, Muhammad Muzammil Qureshi, and Alhaj Shah Jee Gul Afridi.

Published in Dawn, January 5th, 2017
 
.
Steel companies world wide are going through very tough time. China alone has the steel producing capacity equal to that of whole world. They are dumping the goods just covering variable costs. Steel plants are closing every where. In this circumstances it will not be easy for pakistan to run its own plant unless pakistan impose very very high dumping duty and ready to pay a very high cost for domestic production.

The other problem Pakistan will face is the variety of steel. Steel has numerous varieties. The steel produced by pakistan steel plant will hardly be able to meet requirement in few areas. The only way pakistan can produce and use steel is a fully protective measure and ready to pay high cost to boost domestic industries.
 
Last edited:
.
Mr Umar proposed the name of Zaigham Adil Rizvi, former CEO of Tuwairqi Steel Mills Limited (TSML), and sarcastically proposed Hussain Sharif as Chairman of the PSM Board.
:toast_sign:
 
.
Must be funny arguing with our own brother in the parliament. They must have grown up doing it at home, but now doing it infront of the everyone lol
 
.
They need to bring in Top Talent or even consultants from outside

Get the bureaucracy out of the Corporations

Really need to bring 10-15 guys from outside to work on the firms 4-5 Years , or get a Management consultant Group to come fix the operational problems

Local guys have too much personal interest (Salary , Jobs , residence etc) involved they are now business as usual mind set

Firm need not be sold

a) Aboloish Worker Unions
b) Fire the upper management
c) Get new management , or Management consulting firm

Will cost 10-50 Million USD but they will turn the company around if given 4-5% Bonus on revenues deal

Sell it if offer comes for 4-5 Billion (Not the land)
 
.
Steel company world wide are going through very tough time. China alone has the steel producing capacity equal to that of whole world. They are dumping the goods just covering variable costs. Steel plants are closing every where. In this circumstances it will not be easy for pakistan to run its own plant unless pakistan impose very very high dumping duty and ready to pay a very high cost for domestic production.

The other problem Pakistan will face is the variety of steel. Steel has numerous varieties. The steel produced by pakistan steel plant will hardly be able to meet requirement in few areas. The only way pakistan can produce and use steel is a fully protective measure and ready to pay high cost to boost domestic industries.

Sir your concern is justified, but all over the world steel production is decreasing because those countries have industrialized and attained developed world status. The don't have need to build new massive sky scrapers in multiple cities simultaneously, or lay down tracks for metro trains or build industrial units on large scale. Pakistan needs to do all of that, there was one study in which it showed that the per capita production of steel in Pakistan is far lower than what it should be. We need the PSM to be modernized, heck we need it to be completely demolished and rebuilt from the ground up. Not only that we need atleast three or four more plants of similar capacity.

If Pakistan is to undergo a period of rapid industrialization it needs two industries to have excess capacity in the interim period: steel and cement.

Also as for the variety of steel, most industry standard is for 304 or 316/316L Stainless Steel or Mild Steel. If you are able to produce these three four types of steel then you can meet upto 70-80% requirement of the industry. Other types of specialized steels can be produced by smaller, private units.
 
Last edited:
. .
Mr Umar proposed the name of Zaigham Adil Rizvi, former CEO of Tuwairqi Steel Mills Limited (TSML), and sarcastically proposed Hussain Sharif as Chairman of the PSM Board
He also quoted that give the charge of PSM to Hussain Nawaz so he may say ALHAMDULILLAH and all problems solve.
 
.
qualified chartered Accountant being member of icap or qualified cfa is capable of making steel mill profitable if various checks are employed to monitor their working
 
. .
Few Days back King of Bribe (Malik Riaz) said that 2 Land Plots in Islamabad value is more than the Steel Mill bailout packages.....................
 
.
Sir your concern is justified, but all over the world steel production is decreasing because those countries have industrialized and attained developed world status. The don't have need to build new massive sky scrapers in multiple cities simultaneously, or lay down tracks for metro trains or build industrial units on large scale. Pakistan needs to do all of that, there was one study in which it showed that the per capita production of steel in Pakistan is far lower than what it should be. We need the PSM to be modernized, heck we need it to be completely demolished and rebuilt from the ground up. Not only that we need atleast three or four more plants of similar capacity.

If Pakistan is to undergo a period of rapid industrialization it needs two industries to have excess capacity in the interim period: steel and cement.

Also as for the variety of steel, most industry standard is for 304 or 316/316L Stainless Steel or Mild Steel. If you are able to produce these three four types of steel then you can meet upto 70-80% requirement of the industry. Other types of specialized steels can be produced by smaller, private units.

Yes what you are saying is fully correct but here comes the cost. China with over 50% steel production capacity has a huge advantage because of economies of scale. They continued dumping steel in india till we imposed minimum import price. With a very small steel production capacity and high factor cost of factors of production, Pakistan steel industries will need a big big protection. If your your government is ready to do that, yes it is very much possible. But it has a big price to pay in terms of high steel price for end user and that will cripple all industries using steel. So this is basically a question of choice.
 
.
First the story from Tribune.

The prices of Chinese rebars, prior to the duty, stood at around Rs62,000 per ton, but the post-15%-duty-prices are expected to go up to Rs66,000-Rs67,000 per ton. On the other hand, the price of branded rebars was in the range of Rs72,000-Rs74,000 per ton, informed a leading retailer who deals in both Chinese and local branded rebars in Karachi.

But the retailers and consequently, the consumers see this price disparity as neither emanating from underutilisation of local steel industry’s capacity or direct result of a better quality, but as a mere tool to mint money.

“Cheap Chinese rebars have provided a very good alternative to customers because they are of good quality. The government is protecting inefficient branded rebar producers who can’t cut down their costs. We want to sell as cheap as we can, it is not our problem if they are inefficient,” commented the retailer on condition of anonymity because he feared backlash from local players.

http://tribune.com.pk/story/1073930/more-protection-chinese-imports-hurt-pakistans-men-of-steel/

Unquote.

Ever since I came across TATA shutting down Port Talbot Steel plant in UK, I have been reading about state of the steel industry worldwide. I would like to share my observations with the fellow members.

Just like any other industry; Iron / steel industry’s success also depends largely upon 3 things. These being;

a) Availability of cheep & good quality raw material / feed stock.

b) Availability of state of the art plant & machinery.

c) Competency of the management and quality of the workforce resulting in lower cost of production.


Main ingredients for Iron / steel production are iron ore & good quality (anthracite & bituminous) coal. Thar coal is not suitable for steel mill even after processing.

Before one can pass judgement on the fate of Pakistan Steel Mill, one should know who are the largest iron ore & coal producers and which countries are the main steel producers.

(Please note that data available with me is obtained from the internet and about 2 to 3 years old. It is however good enough for this article)

Iron ore production:

China - 710 million tons

Japan- 84-million tons

India - 54-milion tons

Russia - 51-million tons

South Korea - 47-milion tons

Brazil- 30-million tons

Germany- 28-million tons


Coal production:

China: 3,874-million tons

US: 906.9 million tons

Australia: 644-million tons

India: 538-million tons

Russia: 358-milion tons

South Africa: 260-million tons

Germany: 186-milion tons.

Now look at the largest steel producers of the world.

Top 5 producers are:

1. China- 92 million tons.

2. Japan - 41.3 million tons

3. South Korea - 31.9- million tons

4. Russia- 27-million tons

5. Germany- 24.8- million tons


Except for Japan & South Korea; iron & steel producing countries also produce iron ore as well as coal. Japan & South Korea do not have coal but utilise indigenous iron ore.

Most of the China’s steel plants are post 1990 and their labour cost is cheap compared to the Western countries. Additionally, analysts believe that Chinese are selling steel plate at about $34 per ton below cost of production.

China’s influence on the international price of steel is therefore tremendous. A glut of Chinese imports has forced down the steel price and is shutting down steel mills world over.

Pakistan Steel Mill is more than 40 years old and it was not 'State of art' even then. Its raw materials (Iron ore concentrate & coal) are imported. Add to this the corruption and inefficient management & work force; pray tell me how can it ever compete with the either the price or the quality of imported Chinese steel?

The raw material being imported & therefore expensive and the plant being old; appointment of top quality management & engineers would not make PSM products competitive with the Chinese. We have tried this with PIA, it is simply a waste of effort.

We should ask: Are the benefits of supporting Pakistan Mill from cheap Chinese imports likely to outweigh the costs of higher-than-otherwise steel import costs for the entire Pakistan industry?

Another factor to be considered is that GOP policy of protection would distort the domestic economy by increasing cost of production of Pakistani goods.

I am trained to base my decisions on sound economics and a cost-benefit analysis; not on abstract principles of protectionism. I would say “Why beat a dead horse”? Shut down PSM without delay and start again from the beginning. In the meantime enjoy benefits of cheap Chinese import while it lasts.
 
Last edited:
. .
Pakistan steel mill is a battle ground of different political partis mainly MQM and PPP and all hiring is done based on political affiliation..the political mafia extends inside the enterprise in form of worker union...until this politicization does not end..no one can run PSM !
 
.
Back
Top Bottom