What's new

Potential Frigate for Navy

Quwa

Research Partner
Joined
May 16, 2006
Messages
2,538
Reaction score
47
Country
Pakistan
Location
Canada
I guess it all started back in 2004 during the IDEAS event when the Pakistan Navy Chief at the time said that the PN sought at least 4 new frigates in addition to the F-22P - if you call F-22P a frigate. He said the PN was looking at something of heavier displacement and superior capability to the F-22P. Back then many of us thought the PN would go for used Type-23 or some other used frigate.

Well Chile bought the Type-23s available at the time and there were no plans to procure the M-Class from the Netherlands, and the S-Class purchase from Greece did not go through. Eventually it turned out that the PN choose to procure 4 new built corvettes instead of used frigates, and as of now the Turkish Milgem seems to have been chosen.

Recently Kanwa reported that the PN was interested in the Type-054 frigate from China. While it may seem a given that the PN would procure new frigates from China, other variables have entered into the fray. First of the fact that DCN and HDW displayed their frigate designs at IDEAS 2006 - that may not suggest much, but remember things like the P-3 Hawkeye 2000 were also displayed, before PN interest became apparent. The SSK requirement puts DCN and HDW on the forefront as well, and Pakistan may look to tie in multiple requirements towards one supplier in attempt to reduce cost or get a good offset agreement.

The Type-054 FFG is in the 3500-4000 ton displacement range, and so would the DCN La Fayette and HDW MEKO A-200 and Delta. Although the European ones are more expensive, they do have better ASW capabilities than their Chinese counterparts. The site Deagel reports that the MEKO Delta has been designed as a multi-role frigate suitable for modern navies. Given Pakistan's resources but necessities, it may find that a multi-role frigate with full AAW, ASW, ASuW, special operations and apparently land attack capability a good proposition. I think a reasonable estimate of the MEKO D's unit cost would be $350 to $400mn USD per ship, possibly higher.

Although expensive, 4 MEKO D would considerably enhance the PN. I imagine the AAW system would consist of 32? Sylver-43 VLS for Aster 15 SAAM. The ASW could be equipped with either Harpoon Block II or Exocet MM40 Block III. ASuW would be covered with the MU-90 Impact, or maybe the PN may go the Milas Anti-Submarine Missile route? I am just uncertain on how land attack would go onto this ship, the Polyphem land attack missile project was canceled. I think a surface-ship launch version of IDAS could be developed, but that would be limited to near-by coastal targets. The PN is going to negotiate with Turkey for the Milgem, we may ask for the Rolling Airframe Missile system from the U.S and Germany for use on the corvettes - this could be extended for frigate use as well.

If that is too expensive, then the PN could tone it down with the MEKO A-200 similar to South African versions. That would be 16 VLS for Aster 15 SAAM; 8 Harpoon or Exocet; ASW with 4 torpedo launchers for MU-90 or Milas launch containers. This version should not cost PN more than $350mn USD per ship IMO. However given that the Singaporean Formidable Class has a displacement of 3200 tons and can carry the above except with 32 VLS for Aster 15 - I imagine same can be done on MEKO A-200?

Nonetheless, the PN should have (IMO) 4~6 frigates with at least 3500 ton displacement; 16-32+ VLS for a good SAM; 8 Harpoon or Exocet; 4+ torpedo launchers or anti-submarine missile launchers. Such a frigate would range from the La Fayette, MEKO Delta, MEKO A-200 and Type-054A - if latter is modified for better ASW combat. Supplemented by 2 heavier AAW command & control frigates with long-range SAMs like Aster 30 or HQ-9A.
 
The RAM would be a great addition if it is possible to get it.

So the S-types from Greece is not going through? I thought it was a done deal?
 
I wanted to comment on this, but didn't know where to start from. However, great analysis.

I too have a question if you (or others) could possibly know. Is Babur cruise missile able to be fired from anything VLS or is VLS only be used for SAM purposes? Like i am guessing where the Barak and Barak II are fired from, for the Indian naval ships.

Also for the 2 cents. There is a better Aster 30 out.

http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/missile/row/aster.htm
 
I wanted to comment on this, but didn't know where to start from. However, great analysis.

I too have a question if you (or others) could possibly know. Is Babur cruise missile able to be fired from anything VLS or is VLS only be used for SAM purposes? Like i am guessing where the Barak and Barak II are fired from, for the Indian naval ships.
I believe that VLS can be used for other purposes too, BrahMos i think uses VLS on IN ships too along with Barak.
 
I wanted to comment on this, but didn't know where to start from. However, great analysis.

I too have a question if you (or others) could possibly know. Is Babur cruise missile able to be fired from anything VLS or is VLS only be used for SAM purposes? Like i am guessing where the Barak and Barak II are fired from, for the Indian naval ships.

Also for the 2 cents. There is a better Aster 30 out.

http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/missile/row/aster.htm
Well VLS can be used for cruise missile launch, such the Sylver A-70 for the Scalp Naval. However for Babur I am unsure. We have been hearing more about submarine-launch cruise missiles from Pakistan than surface launch. If Pakistan does intend to make Babur capable of launching from surface ships, then I imagine Chinese frigates would be the most feasible. Unless of course the PN intends to switch its cruise missile - which is possible but unlikely. Relating to that, pshamim reported that the French are offering the Scalp EG with the DCN Marlin.

As for the frigates, I want to clarify. The PN should procure 4-6 FFGs that are equipped with a 32 VLS for a good SAM - includes HQ-16; 8 anti-ship missiles; 4-6 torpedo launchers or anti-submarine missile launchers. That does not limit to any specific type, but I prefer something European - the PN could procure Chinese and accomplish the above.

Personally I doubt we would see land attack capability on surface vessels in the frigate or corvette range. I think the PN will equip submarines for land attack as they would be among the safest assets in the Navy when it comes for offensive. Who knows one day they may develop and build (with help) one or two SSN with strategic strike capability.
 
I think more corvettes in the surface fleet should be much more feasible with a stable surface fleet. No need to increase the surface fleet of frigates and destroyers as long as they meet the requirements of the navy.
 
I think more corvettes in the surface fleet should be much more feasible with a stable surface fleet. No need to increase the surface fleet of frigates and destroyers as long as they meet the requirements of the navy.


Agree one hundred percent. In any future conflict with India, very expensive surface fleet would very vulnerable to the IN Mig 29K's. What PN needs a cerdible brown water fleet consisting of Corvettes capable of firing Babur Cruise missiles and missile firing Fast Attack Craft. For blue water navy, we need at least 8 state of the art Hunter-Killer Submarines. Submarine is a true stealth weapon and has better than even chance of ambushing the most sophisticated surface vessel in the world.
 
From what I can see so far, the PN will probably procure a variant of the Type-054A. Variant because the export version will be less than that of the PLAN version. The other reason because the PN may plan to fit some Western sensors, electronics and weapons onto the Type-054A - perhaps for better ASW capability? Nonetheless, the purchase for the Milgem littoral defence and ASW corvette suggests that the PN will bank its anti-submarine warfare on corvettes, submarines and aviation.

However there is a possibility of all PN future frigates and corvettes using the MU-90 torpedo.
 
For now F-22p frigates will do fine, and will give us ability to construct ships and upgrade our ports. Type-054A or other ships probably come in handy once there is a need to replace the aging fleet of our frigates/destroyers. I have doubts about Type-054A getting picked by the PN (We may start a thread discussing various options). I am assuming this because you mention that we will still need to upgrade the ASW capability of the ship. PN like PAF, also wants a diverse fleet, and that fleet will most likely be divided into Western and Chinese. Not sure if PN can afford brand new western frigates and destroyers, but most likely as shown interest before, it will likely want a good-shape second-hand frigates in the future providing almost the same capability.

Once F-22p are operational (considering they will be the latest equipped) Pakistan should look into a joint venture or TOT with China assuming that it will have ability to construct ships at that level.
 
Personally I doubt second hand frigates or combatants are on the cards. The PN dropped plans for 4 used frigates in favour of 4 new-built corvettes. Something like the Type-054A would provide the PN with a good air defence system and the Milgem with good ASW. Of course something like the Formidable Class or FREMM would provide the PN with solid AAW and ASW. We'll see how it all goes. However used ships are out for the time being.
 
Personally I doubt second hand frigates or combatants are on the cards. The PN dropped plans for 4 used frigates in favour of 4 new-built corvettes. Something like the Type-054A would provide the PN with a good air defence system and the Milgem with good ASW. Of course something like the Formidable Class or FREMM would provide the PN with solid AAW and ASW. We'll see how it all goes. However used ships are out for the time being.

If the primary task of PN remains to keep our sea lanes clear, say within 100 miles from the shore, a mix of MAPs ( Orions), land based ASM carrying aircrafts ( J-17 or F-16) and a mix of Corvettes and Missile carrying FAC along with a good SSK fleet for deep sea interdiction should be sufficient. Dont know if PN doctrine has changed and would like to project power in the region ( say Arab Gulf) in that case we do need a good frigate/destroyer fleet ( at least 8) with both ASW and AA capability. However can we really afford it.??. A state of the art frigate would be in $400 -milion dollar range at the very least and one would need at least 3 to be one any real benefit.
 
How good is the current SAM (LY-60?) capability of the Tariq class ships and what type of SAM capability would the PN want on its ships in the future?
 
How good is the current SAM (LY-60?) capability of the Tariq class ships and what type of SAM capability would the PN want on its ships in the future?

Well I would hope for at least a RAM upgrade to the phalanx systems.
 
http://www.bits.de/public/articles/u-boot-pakistan.htm

"the order offers besides the chance on future orders, is there the navy of Pakistan indication in accordance with at a long-term partnership interested." That could be. Pakistan would like later further submarines and shows up also interested in German frigates and corvettes of the type MEKO A200 and/or A100. Their manufacturer, Blohm & Voss, belongs likewise to TKMS.
If TKMS wins the U214 contract, there is a good chance that it will offer MEKO A-200 for PN's 4 FFG requirement. Would be awesome to see MEKO A-200 and U214 serve side-by-side under the PN.
 

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom