Possible Reaction of Pakistan after India's AGNI V 5500KM

[niaz]

Pakistan is a narrow country and even the furthest towns in Baluchistan are less than 1000 KM from Indian border. On this basis any missile with 1500KM range should be able to target all towns in Pakistan. Pakistan would on the other hand need a missile of about 3000 Km to reach Kania Kumari.

Agni 1 was developed way back in early 1990’s and its modified version as Agni 2 has been in Indian arsenal for more than 10 years. This missile has 1500 KM range. Any longer range missile has no effect of the strategic balance except in numbers.

Pakistan has two missiles (Ghauri 2 & Shaheen 2) with more than 2000 Km range. We don’t have any ballistic missile with 3000 KM range. Only when Pakistan develops a 3000 KM range missile, it will make a difference to India.

 

[SHAMK9]

an average pakistani person has other things to worry about instead of india building up nukes, i dont think pakistanis wud care, military might

 

[IndoUS]

Its not like India gonna use an ICBM on Pakistan, or Pakistan gonna use it on India. Smaller range missile will fit the bill. The development of ICBM in India's case is more toward bringing all of China into its nuclear arms range. Not sure who Pakistan is plan on bringing under its range with an ICBM.

 

[KRAIT]

May be we will use on Pakistan from Andaman and Nicobar...

 

[wmdisinfo]

Indians are too transparent.india thinks pakistan can only be attacked by india.lol wake up to the great game israel USA or Nato if attacks then?will we get missiles on lease from CHINA ?or aircraft carriers or submarines from russia like india???

 

[Pakistanisage]

Pakistan needs to develop its own strategy based on its geostrategic aspirations. If we build ICBM's, it will be for our own reasons and not because of India.

 

[IndoUS]

Indians are too transparent.india thinks pakistan can only be attacked by india.lol wake up to the great game israel USA or Nato if attacks then?will we get missiles on lease from CHINA ?or aircraft carriers or submarines from russia like india???

First the aircraft carriers was not even an aircraft carrier to begin with, it was more of a helicopter carrier which the Russian had already decommissioned. India bought it and paid the Russian to convert it. The submarine that India leased is a nuclear attack submarine and these types of submarines don't carry long range missiles. As for missiles, India is developing it by itself, the best proof are the mistakes and failures in tests we have. Even Pakistan can ask China to build them AC or submarines I don't see the problems with that, you pay the money they will give you stuff.

 

[IronsightSniper]

Even though I know that the whole "India-Pakistan" competition thing is just the result of many years of ****-showing, why does it matter if India tests an ICBM, India can already wipe Pakistan off the face of the earth, and Pakistan can do the same. The only reason for an ICBM in the first place is to put your piss mark on the world, telling it that they can't fuddle with you, and even then, you don't need an ICBM to do that, you'd just need the missiles that Pakistan and India already have.

 

[regular]

Its not like India gonna use an ICBM on Pakistan, or Pakistan gonna use it on India. Smaller range missile will fit the bill. The development of ICBM in India's case is more toward bringing all of China into its nuclear arms range. Not sure who Pakistan is plan on bringing under its range with an ICBM.

But why not to use ICBM on India if needed. I guess our quality and range shold be matchless to any country in the world in terms of technology....thats the secret of success.....

 

[IndoUS]

But why not to use ICBM on India if needed. I guess our quality and range shold be matchless to any country in the world in terms of technology....thats the secret of success.....

You would use an ICBM to target a country that is you neighbor why would you waste the money on a missile that doesn't even need the fuel to get to a country that a normal ballistic or cruise missile can get to easily.

 

[killerx]

SHAEEN 4 TIPU ICBM is the answer but thesse are way long range israel ould be in perfect range our gohari 3 and shaeen 3 can already cover entire india tipu ICBM is how ever still under devlopment but if india fires long range missile PAK wil beat that and so it goes on for ever untill we all kill each other

 

[secularbuster]

Pakistan should also produce for others & range should be 10,000 KM as Pakistan is under potential threat from others . Of course it will not be an issue with India .

This should have been the reply from a Pakistani, but strangely some of them are too eager to appease uncle sam and others are shooting blanks.

 

[Sugarcane]

This should have been the reply from a Pakistani, but strangely some of them are too eager to appease uncle sam and others are shooting blanks.

Reply in this forum doesn't matter, We have confidence in our security forces and scientists and surely they are silently working to cater those threats, you will see that when time is appropriate (like we announced our nuke status). At the moment we don't need to announce what we have, what we are doing and what are our plans.

 

[Cool_Soldier]

Let them test, it will help us to test something new and give our neighbours surprise

 

[regular]

You would use an ICBM to target a country that is you neighbor why would you waste the money on a missile that doesn't even need the fuel to get to a country that a normal ballistic or cruise missile can get to easily.

The speed of the ICBM is too fast so it can easily penetrate ure anti-missile defence systems thats why we need ICBMs for India too.....