POLL: which side will win in Syria?

[Umair Nawaz]

u lost one country, israel. Which is also on ISIS side.

 

[500]

USA are the biggest funders of terrorists in the world.

Once again. This articley is written by Robert Fisk - an Assad/Hezbollah fanboy.

u lost one country, israel. Which is also on ISIS side.

ISIS are Iraqi Baath - same party as Assad. They are armed with Russian weapons.

 

[Stannis Baratheon]

* Kurds and Americans are clear winners hands down. Kurds were third class citizens in Assad Syria, now they got de facto independent state with gas and oil.

Americans aren't winners at all. They wanted to rid of the Russian Naval base at Syria and it's still there.

 

[ultron]

The first side has upper hand since it has boots on ground with air support. Saudi and The U.S. are on the same side, by the way.

Saudi Arabia is enemy of Israel. Saudi Arabia is not on the US's side.

 

[Tameem]

one side is Russia and Iran and their Damascus government and Iraqi / Lebanese / Afghan Shia paramilitaries proxies

How can this side can clearly wins when Asad Regime's demise is certain one way or other, today or tomorrow.
If Iran could play his cards more maturely, then their might be a chance for some truce between Sunnis minus ISIS and Shias but unfortunately, Iran invites/side with Russia and make this war between ideologies and historical rivalries (Turko/Arab-Russian), nevertheless if this side opt for some compromise instead of all out evaporation of their enemies, than this side can still win in a region which is more Persian(Beirut to Iraq) than anything else.

one side is Turkey and Saudi Arabia and Qatar and their Army of Conquest and ISIS proxies

A win means, denying Iran/Asad-alavit/Russia anything but a hegemony on the region, Proxies like Anti Asad forces, ISIS & others keeping busy every standing Army from west, russia or persia in every conflict....This is not a big deal, its Achievable.

one side is the US, Britain, France, Germany and their Kurdish Aryans proxies

This side has the least chances to gain anything from this conflict. Their goals are unachievables.
Persian/Russian say in the region will not demise weather Asad stay on the throne or not.
Kurdish forces can't gain anything against turks.
And they are giving their long term enemy "The ISIS" the exact legitimacy what she demands by going collectively against them, making it a purely West vs Islam fight and that is ISIS exactly wanted at this time.
Remember, ISIS cant be defeated by combine West or Russia or Iran or Shias but only from within some Sunni forces. A centralized, strong, Sunni govt can only defeat ISIS......No one else but unfortunately their is no such force in the region at the moment.

 

[Stannis Baratheon]

Once again. This articley is written by Robert Fisk - an Assad/Hezbollah fanboy.

Okay, whatever floats your boat.

 

[Blue Marlin]

Once again. This articley is written by Robert Fisk - an Assad/Hezbollah fanboy.

ISIS are Iraqi Baath - same party as Assad. They are armed with Russian weapons.

i got a question for you @500 , i know you rightly support the rebels[i think] who want to overthrow the syrian government and all but if hypothetically syria were to fall then wouldnt that mean eventually they [the rebels and isis] would turn towards israel.

 

[Stannis Baratheon]

i got a question for you @500 , i know you rightly support the rebels[i think] who want to overthrow the syrian government and all but if hypothetically syria were to fall then wouldnt that mean eventually they [the rebels and isis] would turn towards israel.

Everybody except the Kurds would turn against Israel.

 

[!eon]

You made a nice thread ................
..................................................................................for time passing.

 

[500]

i got a question for you @500 , i know you rightly support the rebels[i think] who want to overthrow the syrian government and all but if hypothetically syria were to fall then wouldnt that mean eventually they [the rebels and isis] would turn towards israel.

Neither rebels nor Assad possess any serious threat to Israel. I dont support rebels, I am simply sick of these insane bombing in name of failed dictator.

 

[DavidSling]

if all Syrian govt institutions (armed forces) are destroyed and they collapse like Libya and Iraq, Israel will kill the "victorious" jihadists and grab more land under guise of fighting the same terror they supported all along.

Actually Israelies tend to be on the side of the "known enemy"(Assad regime) than the unknown enemy(All the rebels).
Altho all sides ain't in favor of Israel

 

[Steve781]

For God's sake shut up about Aryans!

 

[DavidSling]

really ? by "on the side" do you mean support for or against ? because it seems like the state of Israel is actually fueling the jihad in Syria and that they are pro "rebel".

I think by now the world knows well who the enemy is, and it's the crazy jihadists in Syria/Iraq (isis/fsa etc)

these loonies actually think they're fighting some kind of Islamic end times times prophecised battles

and for sure they are not in favor of Israel, they are pure evil, they need to be finished.

*Israel does not support the rebels, it however provide medical care for syrians who come near it's border and are injured (Seems like it shouldn't), it doesn't ask them where they from or if they're rebels or not.
Some 700 Syrians Treated in Israeli Hospitals Since Early 2013 - National - Israel News - Haaretz Israeli News Source
Israel is usually taking the blame for everything, rebels blame Israel for supporting Assad, Assad blames Israel for supporting rebels, and everybody blame Israel for supporting ISIS altho for none of those there's a proff.
Israel does not support any party but it does prefer the known enemy (which is Assad) cause they know what they'll deal with when this is all over, instead of the rebels parties which have unknown agendas.

 

[Abingdonboy]

There is no "winning" in Syria, or that region, anymore- it is a dirty rotting mess that will be in a constant state of turmoil for the majority of our lives.

 

[ultron]

You remember the Three Kingdoms era in China which lasted nearly 100 years. Two sides fight short war. Three sides fight long war.

Three Kingdoms - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia