POLL: should Russia use tactical nuclear weapons on Idlib?

[ultron]

I think so because that's what tactical is for.

 

[Kashmiri Pandit]

No

 

[ZeusMK]

Utilizing Nukes is NEVER favorable for any one

 

[ultron]

Utilizing Nukes is NEVER favorable for any one

WW2 would have continued for years with much higher casualties had the US not used nukes on Japan forcing Japan to surrender.

 

[mike2000 is back]

Yes, Russia should use them.

 

[vizier]

Then when terrorism spreads to next place like Iran for example you can nuke there immediately. No thanks.

 

[Nadezhda]

Nukes should Never be used. Someone has gone Bonkers and is making such a stupid suggestion.

Yes, Russia should use them.

It would be suicidal. Hence, Never.

 

[mike2000 is back]

Nukes should Never be used. Some has gone Bonker and made such stupid suggestion.



It would be suicidal. Hence, Never.

No it wont be, Nobody/country can ever dare Russia. Russia is almighty.

 

[KingWest]

WW2 would have continued for years with much higher casualties had the US not used nukes on Japan forcing Japan to surrender.

That is factually incorrect. Japan was already ready to surrender prior to the use of the A-bom. T

 

[UkroTurk]

1)Have you ever seen tactical weapons in your short life?
2)Do you know what does nucleer weapon mean?
3)How old are you?
4) Soon Russians will start prostitusion like in the 90ies. May be they would choose American Boys.


LoL

 

[Nadezhda]

No it wont be, Nobody/country can ever dare Russia. Russia is almighty.

The first country should be UK.Joking.

 

[C130]

That is factually incorrect. Japan was already ready to surrender prior to the use of the A-bom. T

not unconditionally they weren't

 

[mike2000 is back]

The first country should be UK.Joking.

 

[aanshu001]

Utilizing Nukes is NEVER favorable for any one

Except firing few Tactical NASAR on India

 

[Max]

No, Russia should attack their masters 10000 km away with strategic warheads,