What's new

POLL: should Russia use tactical nuclear weapons on Idlib?

yes or no


  • Total voters
    18
not unconditionally they weren't

Japan gave conditions which unacceptable to the allies(since they had basically won the war already anyway). Reason the U.S used the bomb to finish things off once and for all with minimal casualties.

However, that was over 60 years ago. Today's world is totally different, so the implications of using nukes today is far reaching with huge consequences for the country that will ever dare use it.
 
Japan gave conditions which unacceptable to the allies(since they had basically won the war already anyway). Reason the U.S used the bomb to finish things off once and for all with minimal casualties.

However, that was over 60 years ago. Today's world is totally different, so the implications of using nukes today is far reaching with huge consequences for the country that will ever dare use it.


Taking the Japanese mainland would have cost the lives of millions of American soldiers.
 
No, and anyone who suggests otherwise is an idiot.
 
WW2 would have continued for years with much higher casualties had the US not used nukes on Japan forcing Japan to surrender.
BS, the US used the nukes so it can capture Japan before the USSR takes a piece of it like in Germany.
 

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom